• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Maou Gakuin Discussion Thread

RemaxG1 said:
Can you plz explain further??
Click to expand...
Anos weak 😂😂😂 thats the funniest thing I've heard and the moment you mentioned comp goku beating anos yeah man at that point you downplayed him to much get comp goku to interact with anos oh wait he doesn't 😂😂😂 anos has layerd nothingness duality causality meaning comp goku can't interact with anos transceds nothingness duality causality and there layerd so anos violates the verse of comp goku neg diff. The moment you said Comp Goku beats Anos = 🤡. Also other MFS who mentioned has atleast High outerversal scaling. Even Yogiri can't beat them why Anos needs to beat them? Anos negs any fate characters except Shiki. The moment you called Anos weak without even knowing anything about other characters you mentioned shows you lack knowledge on how to scale. Anos transceds nothingness duality causality and nobody in dragon ball can even interact with anos Anos slams the verse no diff Anos use magic eyes of chaotic destruction and venuzdonoa and the verse is gone. What 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 anos in on very existent misfit is 1AH only for strat like grham.
 
Reiner04 said:
Anos weak 😂😂😂 thats the funniest thing I've heard and the moment you mentioned comp goku beating anos yeah man at that point you downplayed him to much get comp goku to interact with anos oh wait he doesn't 😂😂😂 anos has layerd nothingness duality causality meaning comp goku can't interact with anos transceds nothingness duality causality and there layerd so anos violates the verse of comp goku neg diff. The moment you said Comp Goku beats Anos = 🤡. Also other MFS who mentioned has atleast High outerversal scaling. Even Yogiri can't beat them why Anos needs to beat them? Anos negs any fate characters except Shiki. The moment you called Anos weak without even knowing anything about other characters you mentioned shows you lack knowledge on how to scale. Anos transceds nothingness duality causality and nobody in dragon ball can even interact with anos Anos slams the verse no diff Anos use magic eyes of chaotic destruction and venuzdonoa and the verse is gone. What 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 anos in on very existent misfit is 1AH only for strat like grham.
Click to expand...
I swear to Kami I've seen this exact same reply somewhere lol
 
Reiner04 said:
Anos weak 😂😂😂 thats the funniest thing I've heard and the moment you mentioned comp goku beating anos yeah man at that point you downplayed him to much get comp goku to interact with anos oh wait he doesn't 😂😂😂 anos has layerd nothingness duality causality meaning comp goku can't interact with anos transceds nothingness duality causality and there layerd so anos violates the verse of comp goku neg diff. The moment you said Comp Goku beats Anos = 🤡. Also other MFS who mentioned has atleast High outerversal scaling. Even Yogiri can't beat them why Anos needs to beat them? Anos negs any fate characters except Shiki. The moment you called Anos weak without even knowing anything about other characters you mentioned shows you lack knowledge on how to scale. Anos transceds nothingness duality causality and nobody in dragon ball can even interact with anos Anos slams the verse no diff Anos use magic eyes of chaotic destruction and venuzdonoa and the verse is gone. What 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 anos in on very existent misfit is 1AH only for strat like grham.
Click to expand...
What? My brother's gone out of control, you're saying nonsense stuff. Wang Ling? What does that guy have to do with anything? Difference in cosmology? Of course, there's one. Tensura is H1-A/0, Anos is L1-C, what's this? The Silver Sea won't scale beyond 1-C 5D, why doesn't it show R>F, not even S>C, the Venuzdonoa sword is just fallacies, it couldn't destroy Graham's nothingness and it's not scaling anywhere, 2-A worlds, 4-D infinitely expandable bubbles, is that it? What regenerative paradox? Type 3 NEP-ontological paradox without definition, irreducible paradox, what's Anos doing with Type 2 NEP? Exists outside Akashic records, outside the narrative, what about Anos? With his Type 2 transduality, he's not doing anything to WOG, the cosmology is incomparable, Tensura handles completely superior laws. Order comes from the Silver Sea, any TD from Tensura already exists outside any system and order, and that's Tensura handling Platonic concepts and Type 2 concepts, conceptual dimensions, you can even give quantitative superiority to Anos' verse and he's still not doing anything to WOG, by itself the Cardinal World is scaling higher than any Milicia world (Deep Worlds) besides, Tensura does show R>F with his Type 2 transduality, he's not doing anything to WOG, the cosmology is incomparable, Tensura handles completely superior laws. Order comes from the Silver Sea, any TD from Tensura already exists outside any system and order, and that's Tensura handling Platonic concepts and Type 2 concepts, conceptual dimensions, you can even give quantitative superiority to Anos' verse and he's still not doing anything to WOG, by itself the Cardinal World is scaling higher than any Milicia world (Deep Worlds) besides, Tensura does show R>F with "Promised Land" even if you don't include it, the verse still scales to Tier 1-A, by the way, that 99D thing, fans of Anos mention it all the time, lol dimensions aren't transcended...
 
BreezeHM said:
What? My brother's gone out of control, you're saying nonsense stuff. Wang Ling? What does that guy have to do with anything? Difference in cosmology? Of course, there's one. Tensura is H1-A/0, Anos is L1-C, what's this? The Silver Sea won't scale beyond 1-C 5D, why doesn't it show R>F, not even S>C, the Venuzdonoa sword is just fallacies, it couldn't destroy Graham's nothingness and it's not scaling anywhere, 2-A worlds, 4-D infinitely expandable bubbles, is that it? What regenerative paradox? Type 3 NEP-ontological paradox without definition, irreducible paradox, what's Anos doing with Type 2 NEP? Exists outside Akashic records, outside the narrative, what about Anos? With his Type 2 transduality, he's not doing anything to WOG, the cosmology is incomparable, Tensura handles completely superior laws. Order comes from the Silver Sea, any TD from Tensura already exists outside any system and order, and that's Tensura handling Platonic concepts and Type 2 concepts, conceptual dimensions, you can even give quantitative superiority to Anos' verse and he's still not doing anything to WOG, by itself the Cardinal World is scaling higher than any Milicia world (Deep Worlds) besides, Tensura does show R>F with his Type 2 transduality, he's not doing anything to WOG, the cosmology is incomparable, Tensura handles completely superior laws. Order comes from the Silver Sea, any TD from Tensura already exists outside any system and order, and that's Tensura handling Platonic concepts and Type 2 concepts, conceptual dimensions, you can even give quantitative superiority to Anos' verse and he's still not doing anything to WOG, by itself the Cardinal World is scaling higher than any Milicia world (Deep Worlds) besides, Tensura does show R>F with "Promised Land" even if you don't include it, the verse still scales to Tier 1-A, by the way, that 99D thing, fans of Anos mention it all the time, lol dimensions aren't transcended...
Click to expand...
Holy yap lol
 
Reiner04 said:
Anos weak 😂😂😂 thats the funniest thing I've heard and the moment you mentioned comp goku beating anos yeah man at that point you downplayed him to much get comp goku to interact with anos oh wait he doesn't 😂😂😂 anos has layerd nothingness duality causality meaning comp goku can't interact with anos transceds nothingness duality causality and there layerd so anos violates the verse of comp goku neg diff. The moment you said Comp Goku beats Anos = 🤡. Also other MFS who mentioned has atleast High outerversal scaling. Even Yogiri can't beat them why Anos needs to beat them? Anos negs any fate characters except Shiki. The moment you called Anos weak without even knowing anything about other characters you mentioned shows you lack knowledge on how to scale. Anos transceds nothingness duality causality and nobody in dragon ball can even interact with anos Anos slams the verse no diff Anos use magic eyes of chaotic destruction and venuzdonoa and the verse is gone. What 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 anos in on very existent misfit is 1AH only for strat like grham.
Click to expand...
BreezeHM said:
What? My brother's gone out of control, you're saying nonsense stuff. Wang Ling? What does that guy have to do with anything? Difference in cosmology? Of course, there's one. Tensura is H1-A/0, Anos is L1-C, what's this? The Silver Sea won't scale beyond 1-C 5D, why doesn't it show R>F, not even S>C, the Venuzdonoa sword is just fallacies, it couldn't destroy Graham's nothingness and it's not scaling anywhere, 2-A worlds, 4-D infinitely expandable bubbles, is that it? What regenerative paradox? Type 3 NEP-ontological paradox without definition, irreducible paradox, what's Anos doing with Type 2 NEP? Exists outside Akashic records, outside the narrative, what about Anos? With his Type 2 transduality, he's not doing anything to WOG, the cosmology is incomparable, Tensura handles completely superior laws. Order comes from the Silver Sea, any TD from Tensura already exists outside any system and order, and that's Tensura handling Platonic concepts and Type 2 concepts, conceptual dimensions, you can even give quantitative superiority to Anos' verse and he's still not doing anything to WOG, by itself the Cardinal World is scaling higher than any Milicia world (Deep Worlds) besides, Tensura does show R>F with his Type 2 transduality, he's not doing anything to WOG, the cosmology is incomparable, Tensura handles completely superior laws. Order comes from the Silver Sea, any TD from Tensura already exists outside any system and order, and that's Tensura handling Platonic concepts and Type 2 concepts, conceptual dimensions, you can even give quantitative superiority to Anos' verse and he's still not doing anything to WOG, by itself the Cardinal World is scaling higher than any Milicia world (Deep Worlds) besides, Tensura does show R>F with "Promised Land" even if you don't include it, the verse still scales to Tier 1-A, by the way, that 99D thing, fans of Anos mention it all the time, lol dimensions aren't transcended...
Click to expand...
The assertion, demanding "empirical non-anecdotal tautological epistemological ontological pontification," presents a fascinating blend of philosophical and scientific concepts, yet one that is inherently contradictory. Let's dissect each component:
* Empirical vs. Tautological:
* Empirical evidence relies on observation and experimentation, providing tangible data about the world.
* Tautologies are statements that are true by definition, such as "all bachelors are unmarried men." They offer no new information and are not subject to empirical verification.
* The demand for both empirical evidence and tautology is paradoxical. Empirical claims require evidence from the world, while tautologies are true by their logical form.
* Epistemological and Ontological Foundations:
* Epistemology concerns the nature and scope of knowledge, exploring how we know what we know.
* Ontology investigates the nature of being, examining the fundamental categories of existence.
* Demanding "non-anecdotal" epistemological or ontological grounding requires universal agreement on how knowledge is acquired or what constitutes reality. However, these are complex philosophical questions with various competing theories, and absolute consensus is elusive.
* Noumenon vs. Phenomenon:
* Immanuel Kant introduced the concepts of noumenon (the thing-in-itself, beyond perception) and phenomenon (the thing as it appears to us).
* Demanding "noumenological" substantiation contradicts the requirement for empirical evidence, as noumena, by definition, are beyond the realm of sensory experience and empirical verification.
In essence, the assertion seeks a synthesis of mutually exclusive concepts: empirical evidence and tautological truth, universal epistemological and ontological agreement, and empirical access to noumenal realities. This pursuit of an ideal, all-encompassing form of justification is philosophically unattainable.
 
Dereck03 said:
The assertion, demanding "empirical non-anecdotal tautological epistemological ontological pontification," presents a fascinating blend of philosophical and scientific concepts, yet one that is inherently contradictory. Let's dissect each component:
* Empirical vs. Tautological:
* Empirical evidence relies on observation and experimentation, providing tangible data about the world.
* Tautologies are statements that are true by definition, such as "all bachelors are unmarried men." They offer no new information and are not subject to empirical verification.
* The demand for both empirical evidence and tautology is paradoxical. Empirical claims require evidence from the world, while tautologies are true by their logical form.
* Epistemological and Ontological Foundations:
* Epistemology concerns the nature and scope of knowledge, exploring how we know what we know.
* Ontology investigates the nature of being, examining the fundamental categories of existence.
* Demanding "non-anecdotal" epistemological or ontological grounding requires universal agreement on how knowledge is acquired or what constitutes reality. However, these are complex philosophical questions with various competing theories, and absolute consensus is elusive.
* Noumenon vs. Phenomenon:
* Immanuel Kant introduced the concepts of noumenon (the thing-in-itself, beyond perception) and phenomenon (the thing as it appears to us).
* Demanding "noumenological" substantiation contradicts the requirement for empirical evidence, as noumena, by definition, are beyond the realm of sensory experience and empirical verification.
In essence, the assertion seeks a synthesis of mutually exclusive concepts: empirical evidence and tautological truth, universal epistemological and ontological agreement, and empirical access to noumenal realities. This pursuit of an ideal, all-encompassing form of justification is philosophically unattainable.
Click to expand...
Ah, my esteemed interlocutor, while your prose carries the weight of grandiloquent indignation, it does so at the expense of substantive argumentation. Let us untangle this web of high rhetoric and assess the actual claims being made.Firstly, the charge of “ontological cherry-picking” presupposes that I have selectively ignored crucial metaphysical implications of Venuzdonoa’s operation. However, this assertion lacks specificity—what precisely have I omitted, and by what criterion do you determine its indispensability to the discussion? Without a clear framework delineating what aspects of metaphysics must be addressed, the accusation amounts to little more than an appeal to an undefined standard of rigor.Secondly, you contend that Venuzdonoa negates not only existential axioms but also the very foundation of reason itself. This is a bold claim, yet it hinges on an implicit assumption: that a conceptual entity within a fictional framework must conform to the same logical structures that govern real-world metaphysical inquiry. If the blade functions within a constructed narrative logic distinct from classical ontological commitments, then its effects—however paradoxical—are contingent upon the internal consistency of that fictional metaphysics, not our own.Furthermore, you lament the absence of an alternative hermeneutic that withstands “analytical deconstruction.” Yet, analytical deconstruction presupposes an interpretative framework that you have not adequately justified. If you demand that my position be subject to rigorous hermeneutics, the same standard must be applied to your own. What interpretative methodology do you propose, and why should it be considered the most viable lens through which to assess the matter?Finally, the flourish with which you accuse me of “philosophical perjury” and “a crime against the integrity of logical discourse” is, while theatrically compelling, ultimately vacuous without demonstrable evidence of my purported transgressions. Grandiloquence alone does not an argument make. If your critique is to carry weight, it must rest upon a foundation more substantial than rhetorical flourish.Thus, I invite you to abandon the façade of performative condemnation and engage in a discourse grounded in clarity, specificity, and logical coherence. Surely, if my position is as fragile as you claim, it should collapse under the weight of reasoned argumentation rather than be drowned in a tempest of rhetorical excess.
 
Dereck03 said:
The assertion, demanding "empirical non-anecdotal tautological epistemological ontological pontification," presents a fascinating blend of philosophical and scientific concepts, yet one that is inherently contradictory. Let's dissect each component:
* Empirical vs. Tautological:
* Empirical evidence relies on observation and experimentation, providing tangible data about the world.
* Tautologies are statements that are true by definition, such as "all bachelors are unmarried men." They offer no new information and are not subject to empirical verification.
* The demand for both empirical evidence and tautology is paradoxical. Empirical claims require evidence from the world, while tautologies are true by their logical form.
* Epistemological and Ontological Foundations:
* Epistemology concerns the nature and scope of knowledge, exploring how we know what we know.
* Ontology investigates the nature of being, examining the fundamental categories of existence.
* Demanding "non-anecdotal" epistemological or ontological grounding requires universal agreement on how knowledge is acquired or what constitutes reality. However, these are complex philosophical questions with various competing theories, and absolute consensus is elusive.
* Noumenon vs. Phenomenon:
* Immanuel Kant introduced the concepts of noumenon (the thing-in-itself, beyond perception) and phenomenon (the thing as it appears to us).
* Demanding "noumenological" substantiation contradicts the requirement for empirical evidence, as noumena, by definition, are beyond the realm of sensory experience and empirical verification.
In essence, the assertion seeks a synthesis of mutually exclusive concepts: empirical evidence and tautological truth, universal epistemological and ontological agreement, and empirical access to noumenal realities. This pursuit of an ideal, all-encompassing form of justification is philosophically unattainable.
Click to expand...
^
RemaxG1 said:
Holy yap lol
Click to expand...
 
BreezeHM said:
Ah, my esteemed interlocutor, while your prose carries the weight of grandiloquent indignation, it does so at the expense of substantive argumentation. Let us untangle this web of high rhetoric and assess the actual claims being made.Firstly, the charge of “ontological cherry-picking” presupposes that I have selectively ignored crucial metaphysical implications of Venuzdonoa’s operation. However, this assertion lacks specificity—what precisely have I omitted, and by what criterion do you determine its indispensability to the discussion? Without a clear framework delineating what aspects of metaphysics must be addressed, the accusation amounts to little more than an appeal to an undefined standard of rigor.Secondly, you contend that Venuzdonoa negates not only existential axioms but also the very foundation of reason itself. This is a bold claim, yet it hinges on an implicit assumption: that a conceptual entity within a fictional framework must conform to the same logical structures that govern real-world metaphysical inquiry. If the blade functions within a constructed narrative logic distinct from classical ontological commitments, then its effects—however paradoxical—are contingent upon the internal consistency of that fictional metaphysics, not our own.Furthermore, you lament the absence of an alternative hermeneutic that withstands “analytical deconstruction.” Yet, analytical deconstruction presupposes an interpretative framework that you have not adequately justified. If you demand that my position be subject to rigorous hermeneutics, the same standard must be applied to your own. What interpretative methodology do you propose, and why should it be considered the most viable lens through which to assess the matter?Finally, the flourish with which you accuse me of “philosophical perjury” and “a crime against the integrity of logical discourse” is, while theatrically compelling, ultimately vacuous without demonstrable evidence of my purported transgressions. Grandiloquence alone does not an argument make. If your critique is to carry weight, it must rest upon a foundation more substantial than rhetorical flourish.Thus, I invite you to abandon the façade of performative condemnation and engage in a discourse grounded in clarity, specificity, and logical coherence. Surely, if my position is as fragile as you claim, it should collapse under the weight of reasoned argumentation rather than be drowned in a tempest of rhetorical excess.
Click to expand...
I should write a yap like this in my UPSC exam.
 
EldemadeDityjon said:
Unlike you whose intelligent rating is so low can't be rated because of that 🥴
Click to expand...
Hd256oO.png
 
Reiner04 said:
Anos weak 😂😂😂 thats the funniest thing I've heard and the moment you mentioned comp goku beating anos yeah man at that point you downplayed him to much get comp goku to interact with anos oh wait he doesn't 😂😂😂 anos has layerd nothingness duality causality meaning comp goku can't interact with anos transceds nothingness duality causality and there layerd so anos violates the verse of comp goku neg diff. The moment you said Comp Goku beats Anos = 🤡. Also other MFS who mentioned has atleast High outerversal scaling. Even Yogiri can't beat them why Anos needs to beat them? Anos negs any fate characters except Shiki. The moment you called Anos weak without even knowing anything about other characters you mentioned shows you lack knowledge on how to scale. Anos transceds nothingness duality causality and nobody in dragon ball can even interact with anos Anos slams the verse no diff Anos use magic eyes of chaotic destruction and venuzdonoa and the verse is gone. What 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 anos in on very existent misfit is 1AH only for strat like grham.
Click to expand...
Zeno is classified here as Low 1-C, while Anos is only 2-A, which, according to this forum’s logic, makes Zeno stronger than all characters in Maou Gakuin no Futekigousha and everything in it.
 
Saucy_Jackistan24 said:
Yes, Zeno on very existent erasure solos Anus and his verse
Click to expand...
Zeno Low 1-C >> Maou Gakuin no Futekigousha, Tensura, Instant Death, Bleach, and Dragon Ball Super.

Everyone used to say that Anos and Rimuru were stronger than all of Dragon Ball, but in the end it turned out that Dragon Ball fans knew exactly what they were talking about. It’s honestly funny—everyone who mocked Dragon Ball fans back then was really just laughing at themselves.
 
vsbattles.com

A small addition to Anos and Misha

Anos Voldigoad Afterimage Creation: Anos's speed was so fast that it created an afterimage, making others think that Anos had cloned himself. Forcefield Creation: Anos has an anti-magic field that is always active around him. Animal Manipulation: allows the user to summon and command dragons...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
I previously opened a thread about Venuzdonoa in order to upgrade it to Low 1-A, but the thread was closed without any reason. I want to know why this forum does not consider this sword to be at that level despite the evidence presented in the work.

It is stated in the series that the sword is capable of destroying anything, whether eternal, infinite, or absolute. It can even destroy absolute nothingness and repeat the process, and each time it destroys nothingness, what remains is a more perfect form of nothingness than before yet it continues to destroy it endlessly.

The main and most important reason I say this is that this sword can destroy anything related to numbers and mathematics entirely. In short, mathematics is composed of numbers and built upon numbers in general, which makes this sword capable of destroying all possible mathematical structures, regardless of what they are. This directly corresponds to the Low 1-A level, and I do not know how anyone could deny this.

At the very least, Anos Voldigoad should be upgraded to Low 1-A via Venuzdonoa.

Evidence ↓

I'll answer you as a gift to take to the afterlife. This is Venuzdonoa, the Abolisher of Reason—the demon sword of the founder, destroyer of anything in existence. Be it providence, fate, or a miracle, all will bow down before me and disappear."
No matter how sturdy, how eternal, or how infinite a thing was, Venuzdonoa could destroy it—even reason itself. Reason was meaningless before the Sword of Devastation.
Click to expand...

It doesn't follow reason nor anything number related or things related to distance whether it be magical or conventional. Anything that can be reasoned returns to nothing before this principle destroying sword. It's useless to think about what it can or can't do.
Click to expand...

Enemies in front of me are simply destroyed. That is the only principle that Venuzdonoa allows to exist."

"……How much of a demon king of tyranny are you trying to be!! There can't be such an irrational magic…….!!"

Melheis made a gate in front of him that's different to the ones from before. It's much more extravagant.

"Oh? An absolute space?"

"Indeed. This space is an absolute territory that only the caster can enter. It's an <Azeshis> that makes it impossible to defeat the person inside."

The gate opens and Melheis steps inside.

"I'll withdraw for now Anos-sama. After calculating your new strength I will come up with a new strategy to defeat you and return. Please look forward to it."

I set Venuzdonoa up in a low stance.

"It's regrettable Melheis."

I slash in front of me with my sword.

The space in front of me is split in half and falls apart revealing Melheis.

"….How……? Absolute space is a space completely isolated from the world……It's not possible to interfere from the outside but it was broken……."
Click to expand...

[Did you think that I couldn't destroy you, just because you are nihility?] His source, which was nothing, would never perish.
But, in the presence of the Abolisher of Reason, all logic was null.
Without a doubt, his source had ceased.
Click to expand...
 
Azertyhuuh said:
I previously opened a thread about Venuzdonoa in order to upgrade it to Low 1-A, but the thread was closed without any reason. I want to know why this forum does not consider this sword to be at that level despite the evidence presented in the work.

It is stated in the series that the sword is capable of destroying anything, whether eternal, infinite, or absolute. It can even destroy absolute nothingness and repeat the process, and each time it destroys nothingness, what remains is a more perfect form of nothingness than before yet it continues to destroy it endlessly.

The main and most important reason I say this is that this sword can destroy anything related to numbers and mathematics entirely. In short, mathematics is composed of numbers and built upon numbers in general, which makes this sword capable of destroying all possible mathematical structures, regardless of what they are. This directly corresponds to the Low 1-A level, and I do not know how anyone could deny this.

At the very least, Anos Voldigoad should be upgraded to Low 1-A via Venuzdonoa.

Evidence ↓
Click to expand...
How I wish I could sob react instead of just liking.
 
Azertyhuuh said:
I previously opened a thread about Venuzdonoa in order to upgrade it to Low 1-A, but the thread was closed without any reason. I want to know why this forum does not consider this sword to be at that level despite the evidence presented in the work.

It is stated in the series that the sword is capable of destroying anything, whether eternal, infinite, or absolute. It can even destroy absolute nothingness and repeat the process, and each time it destroys nothingness, what remains is a more perfect form of nothingness than before yet it continues to destroy it endlessly.

The main and most important reason I say this is that this sword can destroy anything related to numbers and mathematics entirely. In short, mathematics is composed of numbers and built upon numbers in general, which makes this sword capable of destroying all possible mathematical structures, regardless of what they are. This directly corresponds to the Low 1-A level, and I do not know how anyone could deny this.

At the very least, Anos Voldigoad should be upgraded to Low 1-A via Venuzdonoa.

Evidence ↓
Click to expand...
You might want to try and upgrade Martial Peak verse too. It has great things, contents and scaling!
 
BreezeHM said:
Wankers mad they can't wank their Verse to 1-A. Stay getting Goko to solo your verse, frauds
63c4YOg.png
63c4YOg.png
63c4YOg.png
Click to expand...
tenor.gif

Don't be like our goons friends who are mad at deleted comments or no approval on wank.

Wank is eternal but approval is not.

MeR9pJT.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

HigashikataJobin
The Most Haxed Low 1-C Characters Fight Each Other
Replies
5
Views
2K
HigashikataJobin
HigashikataJobin
Dereck03
  • Locked
Average MG Thread
2
Replies
60
Views
9K
Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
BoastJr
  • Locked
AURA FARMING LEAGUE ! MATCH 8 : ANOS VS DOCTOR WHO (WEEK 2)
Replies
7
Views
1K
Just a Random Butler
Just a Random Butler
Rikimarox2
A Novel Concept Discussion Thread
Replies
2
Views
624
Rikimarox2
Rikimarox2
DuyVoldigoad
Order is a Script/Plot/Story
Replies
14
Views
856
RemaxG1
RemaxG1
Back
Top