VIZION99
He/Him- 774
- 164
So you are saying the manga and anime are canon to each other?Literally the same case as here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you are saying the manga and anime are canon to each other?Literally the same case as here
What?So you are saying the manga and anime are canon to each other?
Give me a good reason why Manga Goku and Anime Goku share the same ki manipulation.What?
I didn't say they did?Give me a good reason why Manga Goku and Anime Goku share the same ki manipulation.
they act nowhere close to the same, don’t even share any similarities on uses besides immortality, and the characters from each continuity are completely different from one another. William Afton doesn’t even go through the same events between ANY of the continuities, but yeah let’s give them all the same abilities because that obviously makes any sense.Why should the remnant be separated? It would be fair for the remnant page be the same for books and games like how ki manipulation is treated in dragon ball.
So what's the reason ki manipulation can stay the same in continuities?they act nowhere close to the same, don’t even share any similarities on uses besides immortality, and the characters from each continuity are completely different from one another. William Afton doesn’t even go through the same events between ANY of the continuities, but yeah let’s give them all the same abilities because that obviously makes any sense.
Any reason to compile them is just to pad abilities to make the games characters stronger. Power scaling brainrot instead of trying to be accurate.
Because Dragon Ball and it's supporters don't know what the **** they're doing?So what's the reason ki manipulation can stay the same in continuities?
I’m not a dragon ball supporter and don’t know anything about the series so it’s a bit irrelevant to me. If it’s like that it’s like that ig idrc what the dragon ball peeps are doing. This is about the scary bear though.So what's the reason ki manipulation can stay the same in continuities?
Love to see itBump
Filling in blanks of the past is referring to the story events more than Remnant and its capabilities. This probably doesn’t change anything that I proposed.Was looking around, and how does this statement from Scott (specifically the last paragraph) affect this CRT? Like would establishing on remnant/agony and its capabilities count as “filling in the blanks of the past”. He also confirms he’s talking about Fazbear Frights in a reply to a comment, you don’t have to scroll down that much to see it.
Agreed.Filling in blanks of the past is referring to the story events more than Remnant and its capabilities. This probably doesn’t change anything that I proposed.
aw manFilling in blanks of the past is referring to the story events more than Remnant and its capabilities. This probably doesn’t change anything that I proposed.
No overhaxxed Games William for you, he gets to whoop people’s ass with his bare hands like the goat should always have been doing.aw man
It’s cuz I want the Puppet to have shit to doNo overhaxxed Games William for you, he gets to whoop people’s ass with his bare hands like the goat should always have been doing.
The abilities they have are just gonna be on listed on their profile instead of the remnant page, since most are unique to them. A fnaf supporter just needs to figure that out for me since i don't know what abilities games puppet has shown uniquely to them.It’s cuz I want the Puppet to have shit to do
Few lolThe abilities they have are just gonna be on listed on their profile instead of the remnant page, since most are unique to them. A fnaf supporter just needs to figure that out for me since i don't know what abilities games puppet has shown uniquely to them.
Also maybe life manip via give gifts give life but it is super vague and would at best get a possibly.Few lol
Levitation, hallucinations, Toy Animatronic PnA, and that's about it. It just lacks the weak joints cause what ******* joints.
Actually after looking at the sandbox it seems like the only abilities from games the games that are getting axed that aren’t already on the specific character’s profiles are from TOYSHK, so if the OP is just rq changed to give TOYSHK pain manip and power null via the justifications that apply to it that are already on the remnant page that would be great.Now that I think about it, it would be much better if this CRT also tackled what characters would have abilities that are getting axed from the remnant profile so that we won’t have to make another CRT that would also take 87 years to finish after this one which has already been going on for a long time.
Mods fear this CRT.Holy 2 month bump![]()
![]()
Really quickly, could you explain your argument? Scott has always considered the games and the books to be simultaneously equally canon and separated by continuity. Five Nights at Freddy's: Sister Location and Five Nights at Freddy's: Fazbear Frights 1: Into the Pit do not have to take place within the same continuity to share an overarching worldview which defines their lore and the mechanics of its universal systems. The games and the books are both canon. They share a canon; therefore, unless proven otherwise on a case-by-case basis (e.g. Secret of the Mimic), they most likely share the concepts of Remnant, even if the former medium seldom explores its mechanics.-snip-
You're the 3rd or 4th person to bring that up. He says the other continuities are vaguely canon to each other to fill in story and lore beats that aren't shown in the games/the other continuities.Really quickly, could you explain your argument? Scott has always considered the games and the books to be simultaneously equally canon and separated by continuity. Five Nights at Freddy's: Sister Location and Five Nights at Freddy's: Fazbear Frights 1: Into the Pit do not have to take place within the same continuity to share an overarching worldview which defines their lore and the mechanics of its universal systems. The games and the books are both canon. They share a canon; therefore, unless proven otherwise on a case-by-case basis (e.g. Secret of the Mimic), they most likely share the concepts of Remnant, even if the former medium seldom explores its mechanics.
Not only do games like Sister Location and Into the Pit not share the same continuities,
Yes, as explained above. Yes, Henry Emily from the original novel trilogy, "Cassette Man" from Freddy Fazbear's Pizzeria Simulator, and Henry Emily from Five Nights at Freddy's 2 (2025) exist within separate continuities and, thus, have experienced different events. However, throughout said continuities, the three versions of Henry Emily share a common lore: co-founder (alongside Afton) of Fazbear Entertainment, father of the spirit inhabiting the Puppet (Charlotte Emily), primary inventor of the Fazbear Animatronics, etc. Throughout said continuities, the ghosts of dead children are capable of inhabiting and possessing metal, and powerful spirits (e.g., Charlotte, Golden Freddy, Elizabeth, etc.) are born of strong emotion and self-awareness, and Animatronics are given life through artificial intelligence. The timelines are unique, but the lore forms the foundation for every continuity.The characters in each continuity go through completely different events
Does Remnant "act completely different" in the Fazbear Frights novels, or has the Fazbear Frights novels simply revealed information about Remnant (and Agony) which has yet to be properly introduced and/or expanded upon in the games? Are you thinking: "The concept of Remnant in the games and the concept of Remnant in the Fazbear Frights series are fundamentally contradictory"? Or are you thinking: "The concept of Remnant in the games is nowhere near as detailed or defined as in the Fazbear Frights series"? Because the latter is not a valid argument against the two mediums sharing a canon, which has been stated by the original creator of both mediums on numerous occasions.remnant acts completely different in the fazbear frights novels than the games.
All that I'm hearing here is "I want to composite Remnant so I can wank these characters".Yes, as explained above. Yes, Henry Emily from the original novel trilogy, "Cassette Man" from Freddy Fazbear's Pizzeria Simulator, and Henry Emily from Five Nights at Freddy's 2 (2025) exist within separate continuities and, thus, have experienced different events. However, throughout said continuities, the three versions of Henry Emily share a common lore: co-founder (alongside Afton) of Fazbear Entertainment, father of the spirit inhabiting the Puppet (Charlotte Emily), primary inventor of the Fazbear Animatronics, etc. Throughout said continuities, the ghosts of dead children are capable of inhabiting and possessing metal, and powerful spirits (e.g., Charlotte, Golden Freddy, Elizabeth, etc.) are born of strong emotion and self-awareness, and Animatronics are given life through artificial intelligence. The timelines are unique, but the lore forms the foundation for every continuity.
Does Remnant "act completely different" in the Fazbear Frights novels, or has the Fazbear Frights novels simply revealed information about Remnant (and Agony) which has yet to be properly introduced and/or expanded upon in the games? Are you thinking: "The concept of Remnant in the games and the concept of Remnant in the Fazbear Frights series are fundamentally contradictory"? Or are you thinking: "The concept of Remnant in the games is nowhere near as detailed or defined as in the Fazbear Frights series"? Because the latter is not a valid argument against the two mediums sharing a canon, which has been stated by the original creator of both mediums on numerous occasions.
All that I’m hearing here is “I want to ignore WOG so I can downplay these characters”.All that I'm hearing here is "I want to composite Remmant so I can wank these characters"
It very much isn’t.Like isn't curious how Remnant is the only thing getting composite here...
Scott has said that the continuities fill in the gaps on touched on by each other, why wouldn’t remnant apply to that?If you get me a statement that says: "Remnant is the same across continuities of Five Nights at Freddy's", then sure. But we don't have that.
A vague ass statement is not solid proof. Prove this was made in response to Remnant specifically and not something else.Scott has said that the continuities fill in the gaps on touched on by each other, why wouldn’t remnant apply to that?
It was not in response to remnant specifically, that was not part of my justification attempts. Scott also did say that some Frights stories would be “Directly connected to the games, some not” in this steam post (ofc not saying which).A vague ass statement is not solid proof. Prove this was made in response to Remnant specifically and not something else.
AKA, none of them are, because we are not gonna guess on this wiki.It was not in response to remnant specifically, that was not part of my justification attempts. Scott also did say that some Frights stories would be “Directly connected to the games, some not” in this steam post (ofc not saying which).