A space between two timelines will be 5-D?

[Seraphor12]

A space between two or more timelines or spacetime continuums which is universal or maybe even infinite in size would be 5-D? And would this also qualify for low 1-C?

 

[DavidTPPM]

A space between two or more timelines or spacetime continuums which is universal or maybe even infinite in size would be 5-D?

Yes

And would this also qualify for low 1-C?

Not necessarily given our current rules. It'd be considered insignificant in size without some additional evidence proving it's significance

 

[Seraphor12]

Not necessarily given our current rules. It'd be considered insignificant in size without some additional evidence proving it's significance

Is there a particular page which explains these rules?

 

[DavidTPPM]

Is there a particular page which explains these rules?

I suggest reading the Universe page and the FAQ page.
Iirc they describe what makes a dimension/spacetime qualify for low 2-C and the same guidelines apply for making a multiverse qualify as low 1-C.

I think that's probably the closest to direct explanation we have on the wiki

 

[Seraphor12]

I suggest reading the Universe page and the FAQ page.
Iirc they describe what makes a dimension/spacetime qualify for low 2-C and the same guidelines apply for making a multiverse qualify as low 1-C.

I think that's probably the closest to direct explanation we have on the wiki

I see, btw does being consistently mentioned as endless in size satisfies "significant in size" requirement?

 

[DavidTPPM]

I see, btw does being consistently mentioned as endless in size satisfies "significant in size" requirement?

Generally depends on the context, but if it's in reference to the space between timelines then it usually should

 

[Ezaru]

Yes

Not necessarily given our current rules. It'd be considered insignificant in size without some additional evidence proving it's significance

This seems inaccurate?

If it contains universes it has to be bigger right?

Or I guess if you dont count the part taken up by the universe it isnt, but if the universe is infinite and this place surrounds it, it should be infinite no?

 

[DavidTPPM]

This seems inaccurate?

If it contains universes it has to be bigger right?

Or I guess if you dont count the part taken up by the universe it isnt, but if the universe is infinite and this place surrounds it, it should be infinite no?

The universe is infinite but in different directions. Imagine a universe that has infinitesimal height but infinite width and depth. It'd still be 2D because the 3rd dimension is completely insignificant in size. It could never be compared to a universe that's infinite in all 3 dimensions

 

[Ezaru]

Ah so you mean insignificant in 5d size only, that makes sense

The universe is infinite but in different directions. Imagine a universe that has infinitesimal height but infinite width and depth. It'd still be 2D because the 3rd dimension is completely insignificant in size. It could never be compared to a universe that's infinite in all 3 dimensions

 

[DavidTPPM]

Ah so you mean insignificant in 5d size only, that makes sense

Yeah it would still be at least 2-C assuming they're standard timelines ofc

 

[Seraphor12]

Yeah it would still be at least 2-C assuming they're standard timelines ofc

The universe is infinite but in different directions. Imagine a universe that has infinitesimal height but infinite width and depth. It'd still be 2D because the 3rd dimension is completely insignificant in size. It could never be compared to a universe that's infinite in all 3 dimensions

So having a statement like a metaphysical force or strings expanding infinitely in every directions would work for proving infinite distance in extra dimensional axis?

 

[Ezaru]

So having a statement like a metaphysical force or strings expanding infinitely in every directions would work for proving infinite distance in extra dimensional axis?

Every direction should work