- 5,914
- 4,597
I can’t see anything eitherNothing shows up for me. ou I can't see anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can’t see anything eitherNothing shows up for me. ou I can't see anything.
Dead linkAnime scans
You can see the horizon line separating the ground and the sky where I marked in the background. We can complete that scan into a sphere with Paint ( or manga version )
That’s clouds bro…Now?
There is a faint horizon line where the negative energy spreading on the earth ends and where the clouds in the sky end.
Nah, it's not a cloud, the negative energy spreading on the ground disappears on the horizon, clouds do the same. It's really blurry, so should we use the manga? Also im not pointing the clouds zoom in on the imageThat’s clouds bro…
Tho we clearly see that the planet dwarfs Behemoth.
what episode is this btw? feels like i missed that partNow?
There is a faint horizon line where the negative energy spreading on the earth ends and where the clouds in the sky end.
Épisode 12 season 2 iircwhat episode is this btw? feels like i missed that part
9what episode is this btw? feels like i missed that part
Ngl it itches me a bit that these threads always turn out being inactive when a consensus is found about them being agreed on.Basically - but Saqphire makes a good point and I'll avoid complaining about it on this thread at least.
I'm neutral on the topic currently. It's better for me to give no vote than risk a vote that could be affected by bias. I'd have to devote more time than I can afford to currently to investigate it further.Ngl it itches me a bit that these threads always turn out being inactive when a consensus is found about them being agreed on.
You are an admin, supposed to moderate and help VSBW fludify the immense flow of unanswered threads.
You admitted your bias but ended up not giving your vote which blocked us for weeks now.
So, do you agree with this thread ?
So let me rewind everything:I'm neutral on the topic currently. It's better for me to give no vote than risk a vote that could be affected by bias. I'd have to devote more time than I can afford to currently to investigate it further.
It’s not, but being neutral out of pure bias is we need your approval and you know it.Being neutral isn't against the rules, is it?
Sure, 4kota happens 16 years after NNT it’s impossible to find a lower end than this do you agree with it ?Until I have the time and interest to get involved with revising the verse, voting on the thread isn't warranted yet. I don't "know" that the suggested timeframes are correct yet, or if the size of the realms is accurate.
Your question? You mean you sent in a question to Nakaba Suzuki?The author also gently answered my question in the Q&A and stated that some dimensions holds starry skies and others endless night.
lolThe author also gently answered my question in the Q&A and stated that some dimensions holds starry skies and others endless night.
Yeah he answered it in his q&aYour question? You mean you sent in a question to Nakaba Suzuki?
Well, that's not admissable. We have strict rules about contacting and sending questions to creators like that.Yeah he answered it in his q&a
The email is sent to the editor, who then selects and forwards it to Nakaba. No rules are being broken. It's worth noting that this was something the author himself requested to be implemented. I'm certain this rule doesn't apply to the NNT Q&AWell, that's not admissable. We have strict rules about contacting and sending questions to creators like that.
Doesn't this still go against the rules since it's still the editor who send it to the author? I don't think it's usable in the slightest.The email is sent to the editor, who then selects and forwards it to Nakaba. No rules are being broken. It's worth noting that this was something the author himself requested to be implemented. I'm certain this rule doesn't apply to the NNT Q&A
There is no contradiction. We already know that there are starry skies in some dimensions, and in one episode, Anna asks again, "Is the starry sky still visible in Camelot?" In response (I can't remember to whom) a sentence like "Yes, the starry sky behind the endless night" is made. Nothing is said in this question-answer that doesn't exist in the series."In addition, the statements they give to appease users are often contradictory to the feats in the stories of the works they have written. Thus, it is frowned upon to bother them over these topics."
This doesn't make senseDoesn't this still go against the rules since it's still the editor who send it to the author? I don't think it's usable in the slightest.
The answers never contradicted the work"In addition, the statements they give to appease users are often contradictory to the feats in the stories of the works they have written. Thus, it is frowned upon to bother them over these topics."
All I'm saying is that contacting the Editor to get an answer from the creator of NNT and 4KOA shouldn't be used or considered.This doesn't make sense
Even so, it clearly goes against the rules of contacting creators and authors of Vs Battle Wiki. It doesn't matter if it doesn't contradict anything, the rules are clear.The answers never contradicted the work
No. Battleboarding questions are prohibited here. It is stated that normal questions that do not harass or disturb the author can be asked.Alright, so I found this comment from Aggna in this thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/rewording-wog-rules.179458/#post-7087906 (I'm on my phone and can't edit links for some reason so I'll just leave the link)
What Agnaa said: "When it's a WoG not asked by a member of our community, it's preferred if it's from an official Q&A, not leading, and has a rather elaborate/serious response. It doesn't need all of these, and this sort of thing should be judged on a case-by-case basis.
Like, I think if someone not from our community asks "Can this character use this ability to heal?" and the author provides a 5 paragraph answer explaining that they can, but also detailing all the limitations that come with that, we should treat that seriously. Even though one could argue that it's leading/powerscaling-related."
Since Makai is a member and was the one who asked the question, I don't think it's usable in the slightest based on what Agnaa said here.
This is not against the rules.All I'm saying is that contacting the Editor to get an answer from the creator of NNT and 4KOA shouldn't be used or considered.
Asking the author questions through official channels is not against the rules.Even so, it clearly goes against the rules of contacting creators and authors of Vs Battle Wiki. It doesn't matter if it doesn't contradict anything, the rules are clear.
Nakaba gives us a detailed explanation of the question, saying that it is possible to see in some places and not in others, he doesn't just say "yes", and we also have visual evidence.Can this character use this ability to heal?" and the author provides a 5 paragraph answer explaining that they can, but also detailing all the limitations that come with that, we should treat that seriously. Even though one could argue that it's leading/powerscaling-related.
Well, Nakaba posts Q&A corners where fans can ask him random questions it’s not something I asked randomly.Well, that's not admissable. We have strict rules about contacting and sending questions to creators like that.
It’s not contradictory since he shows starry skies in Neo CamelotDoesn't this still go against the rules since it's still the editor who send it to the author? I don't think it's usable in the slightest.
"In addition, the statements they give to appease users are often contradictory to the feats in the stories of the works they have written. Thus, it is frowned upon to bother them over these topics."
I didn’t ask the editor, Nakaba makes special corners on his website etc… and tell us to ask some questions that he will randomly answer.All I'm saying is that contacting the Editor to get an answer from the creator of NNT and 4KOA shouldn't be used or considered.
It doesn’t in this case it’s the author that ask us to post questions.Even so, it clearly goes against the rules of contacting creators and authors of Vs Battle Wiki. It doesn't matter if it doesn't contradict anything, the rules are clear.
So, I sent the evidence do you agree with the thread ?Your question? You mean you sent in a question to Nakaba Suzuki?
I've done some rereading. At the moment I think it is better to wait for further clarification on Arthur's ability and the nature of Camelot. From what we've been told, whenever Arthur creates something in Camelot he is snatching material from the real-world for it, so it's not just Arthur's raw power being involved in the creation process here. If it is being shown that whole stars are disappearing from the real world, or we get more information about the true size of Camelot, then I'd be more confident on the conclusion but right now it's not clear to me that Arthur is creating or manipulating whole stars or that the dimension of Camelot is that big if it is dependent on taking material from the real world.So, I sent the evidence do you agree with the thread ?
He takes parts of britannia in order to recreate memories of the loved ones.I've done some rereading. At the moment I think it is better to wait for further clarification on Arthur's ability and the nature of Camelot. From what we've been told, whenever Arthur creates something in Camelot he is snatching material from the real-world for it, so it's not just Arthur's raw power being involved in the creation process here. If it is being shown that whole stars are disappearing from the real world, or we get more information about the true size of Camelot, then I'd be more confident on the conclusion but right now it's not clear to me that Arthur is creating or manipulating whole stars or that the dimension of Camelot is that big if it is dependent on taking material from the real world.
I've done some rereading. At the moment I think it is better to wait for further clarification on Arthur's ability and the nature of Camelot. From what we've been told, whenever Arthur creates something in Camelot he is snatching material from the real-world for it, so it's not just Arthur's raw power being involved in the creation process here. If it is being shown that whole stars are disappearing from the real world, or we get more information about the true size of Camelot, then I'd be more confident on the conclusion but right now it's not clear to me that Arthur is creating or manipulating whole stars or that the dimension of Camelot is that big if it is dependent on taking material from the real world.
The counter argument of Arthur taking things from Britannia was refuted nothing left counters the OPWait what argument was refuted. I know the Q&A stuff was considered Battleboarding but there is Manga evidence of stars being present in the dimensions
I don't think that was refuted; nothing about the scan that was posted above changed what I said. Pellegarde just repeats the information that land is being taken from Britannia to fuel what is being created in Camelot.The counter argument of Arthur taking things from Britannia was refuted nothing left counters the OP
Neo Camelot is the eternal kingdom, a place where you can find your deceased loved ones due to Arthur using parts of Britannia in order to simulate life with their memories.I don't think that was refuted; nothing about the scan that was posted above changed what I said. Pellegarde just repeats the information that land is being taken from Britannia to fuel what is being created in Camelot.