You must think I was born yesterday or something, lmao. I've been around the block a couple of times to know how this thing works.
Look, there's a whole bunch of feats for these comic book characters, but there are a whole bunch of instances of Peter nearly dying from
freefall or bullets or barely being harmed by explosions that don't even qualify as nukes.
What you're doing is citing a few instances of writers exaggerating what a character can realistically pull off and saying that takes precedence over literal continuity and what the character consistently accomplishes. Spider-Man isn't ******* Hulk Tier. If Venom Blasts were that effective on characters who can break apart planets, they'd turn virtually every thug or character Miles goes up against into electrocuted jelly. This in itself is a major inconsistency with this kind of scaling.
Ultimate Peter Parker STRUGGLED to outrun a ******* sniper bullet heading towards Captain America, and this is the same guy who knocked dout Miles in one hit... But light-speed, am I right? Oh, are we just gonna pretend that the bullet was somehow light-speed now?
Like, you can't be serious, right? YOU'RE CAPPING
This is the problem with comic books and comic power-scaling. People take every feat hyper literally without looking at the context. That isn't how powerscaling or VS debates work. There are numerous instances of Peter being defeated by some B-lister or STRUGGLING to fight dudes who can't even move at Mach speeds. Do not make me drop the scans, lmao.
Now, I'm not saying Peter or Miles is that slow, but when you're taking a feat out of context to get what you want... well, know that people can do the same.
