• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Chucky Verse Upgrade

Messages
433
Reaction score
436
Yes, it will be very short and easy, I start right away


As you can see in the season 1 finale of Chucky, Tiffany planted explosives in the house, which are considered 9-A in Tiffany's profile.

When Kyle opened the door, the explosion occurred, and Andy Barclay was inside the house at that moment. The only way to escape was the path Devon managed to take, but Andy was exposed to the blast inside.

Devon stated that he made it out, but Andy and Kyle couldn’t get out of the house.

In later scenes, we see that Andy Barclay survived the explosion with serious injuries on his face, indicating that he endured the blast. This makes Andy’s durability scale to 9-A.


Chucky can harm Andy, and Tiffany can harm Chucky. (1:40) So, Andy Barclay’s attack potency and durability should also scale to 9-A, based on Chucky and Tiffany. Technically, Kyle and Jake would scale as well, but they don’t have profiles yet. Perhaps in the future, if someone creates profiles for them, this scaling can be added for them too.
 
Did you calculate Andy's durability via Inverse Square Law? Evidently not.
 
Unless the bomb was right under Andy (which is definitely isn’t) he shouldn’t scale to the full force of the blast. Surface area need to be taken into consideration for calcs like this.
 
Unless the bomb was right under Andy (which is definitely isn’t) he shouldn’t scale to the full force of the blast. Surface area need to be taken into consideration for calcs like this.
But the explosion blew up the whole house, so how can we calculate this situation in any way?
 
It's called surface area. Andy took a fraction of the blast, and that ******* incapacitated him so he wouldn't scale anyway
Oh sorry I didn't pay attention to that, so would it work to calc this in any other way, what can we do most without all the energy?
 
Oh sorry I didn't pay attention to that, so would it work to calc this in any other way, what can we do most without all the energy?
I'm no good with calcs, that's something you ask a Calc Group member how to do, I'd support Andy scaling to his durability yield from the bomb with an At Most rating, and scale nobody to it unless they also one-shot adult Andy.
 
I'm no good with calcs, that's something you ask a Calc Group member how to do, I'd support Andy scaling to his durability yield from the bomb with an At Most rating, and scale nobody to it unless they also one-shot adult Andy.
Alr thank you for your response, I'd better talk to someone who's good with calc
 
Sorry, I couldn't take care of this place enough, my work is very busy, and I had a hard time finding a calc officer, if there is someone among you who is interested, he can show this feat to a calc officer and ask him to do it.
 
Back
Top