• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Expanding the References for Common Feats page

Unless something has changed (which would have happened in this thread) then any of those common feats would be valid still unless said otherwise
okay just asked because calc about destroying moon from earth is in comment rather than blog itself
 
is this usable or does it need approval?
Unless something has changed (which would have happened in this thread) then any of those common feats would be valid still unless said otherwise
I think we already applied the sun calculation to the page.
 
I think we already applied the sun calculation to the page.
yes but what about the moon?
 
We'll probably either have to touch base with M3X on that so he can update it or create a new blog with that formula.

I can offer to do both or the latter.
You can do what you find easier
tho is this by launching attack to moon that yields 5-A trough KE or omnidirectional blast like shown in blog
 
You can do what you find easier
tho is this by launching attack to moon that yields 5-A trough KE or omnidirectional blast like shown in blog
latter
it's an omnidirectional blast that starts from earth, expands as far as the moon with enough energy to destroy the moon
exactly the same as the one with the sun except the values are swapped out for the relevant ones regarding the moon
 
You can do what you find easier
tho is this by launching attack to moon that yields 5-A trough KE or omnidirectional blast like shown in blog
latter
it's an omnidirectional blast that starts from earth, expands as far as the moon with enough energy to destroy the moon
exactly the same as the one with the sun except the values are swapped out for the relevant ones regarding the moon
Unfortunately, I can't get in touch with M3X due to his account being closed, so I put the calculation in a new blog here.
 
What do we currently need to do here?

Also, @M3X_2.0 is still around if you need to contact him. 🙏
 
Oh, I'm sorry; I didn't realize M3X was his previous account. Thank you, Ant.
No problem. 🙏🙂
Well, I already put the formula for the Earth that @KLOL506 put out in a blog, but if needed, I could always ask @M3X_2.0 to put it into his original calculation he made.
It is likely fine with your own blog, but at least two calc group members need to accept it in order to add the calculations in it as a standard feat. 🙏
 
Shouldn't we provide clarification on bone breaking? Like how much is it common sense that every bone isn't going to have the durability of a femur, that's not mentioning we can break the bones of each other's torsos and skulls in street fights and yet we'd still be 10-B in energy output?

Bones are living tissue that adapt depending on how much force is generally put on them. And I can easily say a small fish's bones aren't equal to that of a human femur.

Does anyone want to see my proposals for this issue? It's pretty glaring considering a lot of fiction is off-scaled from regular humans.
 
Shouldn't we provide clarification on bone breaking? Like how much is it common sense that every bone isn't going to have the durability of a femur, that's not mentioning we can break the bones of each other's torsos and skulls in street fights and yet we'd still be 10-B in energy output?

Bones are living tissue that adapt depending on how much force is generally put on them. And I can easily say a small fish's bones aren't equal to that of a human femur.

Does anyone want to see my proposals for this issue? It's pretty glaring considering a lot of fiction is off-scaled from regular humans.
I would, and also, not sure if these might contribute? (If they can be compared to breaking bone in any way that is)

 
I would, and also, not sure if these might contribute? (If they can be compared to breaking bone in any way that is)

If you have no reason to why this is related, then don't say it is related.

Actually, hysterical strength being 9-B had been debunked at least twice on this forum. One where this was used to try to make composite human 9-B and the other under my research.

Much of the accounts are emotionally charged and just redirects the weight of the vehicles with difficulty rather than causal tipping. We also may not know if the Polar Bear a woman fought was at full strength, and even if the bear was at full strength, the feat at first glance didn't wrestle a bear that had class 1 weight. This is also assuming these cases are true, as it would be unethical to try to replicae said feats in a lab. While scientists may disagree on the existence of hysterical strength, it's generally accepted that the body does increase it, but not to these exaggerated levels.

You do have accounts of men fighting wolves and leopards, 10-A hysterical strength for men is more consistent.

Enough rambling and clogging stuff for now, if you wanna chat more on this hysterical strength stuff, do it on the discussion threads
 
Shouldn't we provide clarification on bone breaking? Like how much is it common sense that every bone isn't going to have the durability of a femur, that's not mentioning we can break the bones of each other's torsos and skulls in street fights and yet we'd still be 10-B in energy output?

Bones are living tissue that adapt depending on how much force is generally put on them. And I can easily say a small fish's bones aren't equal to that of a human femur.

Does anyone want to see my proposals for this issue? It's pretty glaring considering a lot of fiction is off-scaled from regular humans.



Just backing up the point about tissues in general adapting to stress and the conditions they are placed in in general
 
Shouldn't we provide clarification on bone breaking? Like how much is it common sense that every bone isn't going to have the durability of a femur, that's not mentioning we can break the bones of each other's torsos and skulls in street fights and yet we'd still be 10-B in energy output?

Bones are living tissue that adapt depending on how much force is generally put on them. And I can easily say a small fish's bones aren't equal to that of a human femur.

Does anyone want to see my proposals for this issue? It's pretty glaring considering a lot of fiction is off-scaled from regular humans.
I think that this seems reasonable. 🙏
 
I think that this seems reasonable. 🙏
When it comes to bones, it depends on the physical build, in verse context, and what the broken bones are adapted to withstand initially.

Generally, without any other calculations, a standard forceful blow to the head/torso/arms is generally around 10-B to 10-A energy depending on the weight+gender+physical build of the person. This is considering the fact that the energy required to fracture a skull has been studied and calculated to be in range of this and it's far easier to punch the middle/upper areas of the body than the bottom.

It should be noted that some bones are far easier to break than others due to their adaptive quality, shape and size. If the bone didn't make itself strong and/or sizable enough, it wouldn't count anywhere 10-B and above. That's not mentioning fish bones, an old person's bones, and the smallest/weakest bones can't withstand anywhere 10-B and above.

As for other severe bone-breaking feats, I'm not saying all bone breaking is that unimpressive. If the bone breaking is incredibly severe (example: twisting an arm bone to where it massively deforms an arm, severely crushing a part of the skull, severely twisting a backbone in an unnatural way), it would be absolutely be comparable to the low-end 375 J of breaking a human femur. It's just that when dealing with human bones and the like in fiction, we have to take into account bone strength and bone damage severity.
 
I'm not sure if atomizing the Moon is a “common” feat, plus it's funny how it barely gives results above baseline Moon level.
 
When it comes to bones, it depends on the physical build, in verse context, and what the broken bones are adapted to withstand initially.

Generally, without any other calculations, a standard forceful blow to the head/torso/arms is generally around 10-B to 10-A energy depending on the weight+gender+physical build of the person. This is considering the fact that the energy required to fracture a skull has been studied and calculated to be in range of this and it's far easier to punch the middle/upper areas of the body than the bottom.

It should be noted that some bones are far easier to break than others due to their adaptive quality, shape and size. If the bone didn't make itself strong and/or sizable enough, it wouldn't count anywhere 10-B and above. That's not mentioning fish bones, an old person's bones, and the smallest/weakest bones can't withstand anywhere 10-B and above.

As for other severe bone-breaking feats, I'm not saying all bone breaking is that unimpressive. If the bone breaking is incredibly severe (example: twisting an arm bone to where it massively deforms an arm, severely crushing a part of the skull, severely twisting a backbone in an unnatural way), it would be absolutely be comparable to the low-end 375 J of breaking a human femur. It's just that when dealing with human bones and the like in fiction, we have to take into account bone strength and bone damage severity.
Bump
 
When it comes to bones, it depends on the physical build, in verse context, and what the broken bones are adapted to withstand initially.

Generally, without any other calculations, a standard forceful blow to the head/torso/arms is generally around 10-B to 10-A energy depending on the weight+gender+physical build of the person. This is considering the fact that the energy required to fracture a skull has been studied and calculated to be in range of this and it's far easier to punch the middle/upper areas of the body than the bottom.

It should be noted that some bones are far easier to break than others due to their adaptive quality, shape and size. If the bone didn't make itself strong and/or sizable enough, it wouldn't count anywhere 10-B and above. That's not mentioning fish bones, an old person's bones, and the smallest/weakest bones can't withstand anywhere 10-B and above.

As for other severe bone-breaking feats, I'm not saying all bone breaking is that unimpressive. If the bone breaking is incredibly severe (example: twisting an arm bone to where it massively deforms an arm, severely crushing a part of the skull, severely twisting a backbone in an unnatural way), it would be absolutely be comparable to the low-end 375 J of breaking a human femur. It's just that when dealing with human bones and the like in fiction, we have to take into account bone strength and bone damage severity.
So how should we adjust our references for common feats page, and do we need help from calc group members here? 🙏
 
So how should we adjust our references for common feats page, and do we need help from calc group members here? 🙏
TBH, my reply strikes the heart of the issue. It just needs more concise and grammatically correct wording.

Unless if anyone else wants to step in and rewrite the post, I could always do it myself in a couple of weeks/days.
 
Okay. That seems good to me then, although you obviously need to link to reliable scientific sources in our RFCF page for the new energy values that you will list there. 🙏
 
They will likely ignore me, so it is better if you ask in the thread below instead. 🙏

 
how many times in fiction have we atomized the moon, really
to be honest, i dont know but given there is already that calc for it i assumed he made it because there were already the cases of these feats happening, if we need to find specific amount of these feats happening then we can try to find, and if there isnt enough then it can lay in the limbo i guess, and calculate that specific feat for the verse instead.
 
There's a math mistake in https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/References_for_Common_Feats#Creating_a_Snowstorm

The last line says:
Q = (2794760824633.48)*1000*20.5 = 5.86*10^20 Joules, 13.69 Megatons of TNT (7-B)

It should read:
(2794760824633.48)*1000*20.5 = 5.15 * 10^16 joules.

Anyway, I plan to submit a new creating snowstorm and making it snow calculation, with formulas and pre-calculated standard feats for the wiki page.
 
I sorta want to ask how fast it could be done with a Zweihander/Doppelhänder/Beidhänder/Bihänder/Bidenhänder, Zhanmadao and/or Changdao, and Odachi/Nodachi and/or Nagamaki (and/or other greatswords/longswords), but that might be too much (also polearms generally outdo even greatswords (look at the Sarissa and Langxian and Yari) in terms of length which counters the advantage of concealment and fast deployment by virtue of size and range, so eh).
 
I sorta want to ask how fast it could be done with a Zweihander/Doppelhänder/Beidhänder/Bihänder/Bidenhänder, Zhanmadao and/or Changdao, and Odachi/Nodachi and/or Nagamaki (and/or other greatswords/longswords), but that might be too much (also polearms generally outdo even greatswords (look at the Sarissa and Langxian and Yari) in terms of length which counters the advantage of concealment and fast deployment by virtue of size and range, so eh).
I'll focus the discussion here since the other thread is dead. It should be pretty easy is you get the blade length of the sword.
 
I sorta want to ask how fast it could be done with a Zweihander/Doppelhänder/Beidhänder/Bihänder/Bidenhänder, Zhanmadao and/or Changdao, and Odachi/Nodachi and/or Nagamaki (and/or other greatswords/longswords), but that might be too much (also polearms generally outdo even greatswords (look at the Sarissa and Langxian and Yari) in terms of length which counters the advantage of concealment and fast deployment by virtue of size and range, so eh).
I'll focus the discussion here since the other thread is dead. It should be pretty easy is you get the blade length of the sword.
Here you go:

There's a few more you could consider as well:

More here too (listing all different categories and types of swords as well as listing specific individual swords):
 
There's a math mistake in https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/References_for_Common_Feats#Creating_a_Snowstorm

The last line says:
Q = (2794760824633.48)*1000*20.5 = 5.86*10^20 Joules, 13.69 Megatons of TNT (7-B)

It should read:
(2794760824633.48)*1000*20.5 = 5.15 * 10^16 joules.

Anyway, I plan to submit a new creating snowstorm and making it snow calculation, with formulas and pre-calculated standard feats for the wiki page.
@DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @Therefir @Damage3245 @Agnaa

Are any of you willing to evaluate, and, if necessary, correct this, please? 🙏
 
Back
Top