• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Revenant Marvel Comics Discussion Thread

Saitama is a bad example since he isn't used for scaling in his verse. He is the top dog and anyone's feat, he upscales to it.
You missed my point. I'm talking about Saitama holding back a lot, and yet he's not given a Varies rating.

Nope. They are vary for a reason. Thor and Hercules restrict themselves when fighting mortals or weaker opponents, Hulk because of rage power and also follows Banner's not killing rule.
Yeah, they hold back in a lot of fights, like Saitama and other characters in fiction, that doesn't mean we give them a Varies rating for that, because it's pointless and arbitrary.

It's easy to prove if you have read them deeply.
In this case explain how you differentiate when Thor or Hulk is 5-B or 3-C or Low 1-C during a fight.
 
You missed my point. I'm talking about Saitama holding back a lot, and yet he's not given a Varies rating.


Yeah, they hold back in a lot of fights, like Saitama and other characters in fiction, that doesn't mean we give them a Varies rating for that, because it's pointless and arbitrary.
Unlike Thor or other Herald characters, Saitama is a different case. Thor can go as far as losing but Saitama would eventually elevate himself to win all the time.
In this case explain how you differentiate when Thor or Hulk is 5-B or 3-C or Low 1-C during a fight.
A newly transformed Hulk is 5-B. Hulk can maintain that level when he is fighting weak opponents. Thor holds back against mortals unless special cases like Hulk.
 
Tell me who are the characters with Varies in Marvel:

Abstract (M-body): They can choose how powerful they wanna be
Hulk: Rage and Banner's rule
Skaar: Ragw just like his father
Juggs: Cytorrak
Sentry: Mental State and holding back
Galan: Depending on his stomach
Odin: Odinsleep
Thor: Holding back against mortals
Kallark: Confidence

All Heroes holds back but as for characters like Thor and Superman, it is their defined trait and it what makes them who they are. It determines how they fight and how they act. It's something they do at all time. Saitama is all about surpassing his limits and holding back those limits.

You ask again how can we determine when a character is holding back, if you read carefully, you will know when a character is holding back. Narrative can also help you know. Speech Bubble also. It not that hard to tell.
 
I think we need to expand upon the Herald split in each affected character's page, either in their justification or a note. Like each character should explain exactly why they are 3-C or Low 1-C.

Looking at the profiles now, my biggest worry is that I don't think 3-C is a good tier to use for Mid Heralds, since as far as I can tell all of the feats are from characters who have much higher ends. I don't think we can arbitrarily decide that it is these feats that represent the level they are fighting at when fighting Mid Heralds. I think if possible we need to find feats from the currently 3-C characters to use instead.
 
I think we need to expand upon the Herald split in each affected character's page, either in their justification or a note. Like each character should explain exactly why they are 3-C or Low 1-C.

Looking at the profiles now, my biggest worry is that I don't think 3-C is a good tier to use for Mid Heralds, since as far as I can tell all of the feats are from characters who have much higher ends. I don't think we can arbitrarily decide that it is these feats that represent the level they are fighting at when fighting Mid Heralds. I think if possible we need to find feats from the currently 3-C characters to use instead.
Yeah, i am working on that
 
Thor can go as far as losing but Saitama would eventually elevate himself to win all the time.
Thor does this for moral reasons, not because his physical strength varies canonically. That's the only difference he has with Saitama.

Thor holds back against mortals unless special cases like Hulk.
It doesn't explain to me how you can tell the difference between a 3-C Thor or a Low 1-C Thor in a fight.

Tell me who are the characters with Varies in Marvel:

Abstract (M-body): They can choose how powerful they wanna be
Hulk: Rage and Banner's rule
Skaar: Ragw just like his father
Juggs: Cytorrak
Sentry: Mental State and holding back
Galan: Depending on his stomach
Odin: Odinsleep
Thor: Holding back against mortals
Kallark: Confidence

All Heroes holds back but as for characters like Thor and Superman, it is their defined trait and it what makes them who they are. It determines how they fight and how they act. It's something they do at all time. Saitama is all about surpassing his limits and holding back those limits.

You ask again how can we determine when a character is holding back, if you read carefully, you will know when a character is holding back. Narrative can also help you know. Speech Bubble also. It not that hard to tell.
The problem is that there are multiple ratings for Thor when he is not at his full/divine power (1-A). How do you tell the difference between a Thor who is 3-C or Low 1-C? And why would a Thor who is not at full power just be 3-C or Low 1-C? If Thor holds back a lot, why just give him 3-C and Low 1-C and not Planet level or Large Building level rating? It just seems arbitrary and complicated for nothing
 
How come one of the most iconic X-Men villains don't have profiles ?

s-l1200.jpg
 
The problem is that there are multiple ratings for Thor when he is not at his full/divine power (1-A). How do you tell the difference between a Thor who is 3-C or Low 1-C? And why would a Thor who is not at full power just be 3-C or Low 1-C? If Thor holds back a lot, why just give him 3-C and Low 1-C and not Planet level or Large Building level rating? It just seems arbitrary and complicated for nothing
It is complicated not arbitrary, thats why we are always careful when scaling characters.
 
It is complicated not arbitrary, thats why we are always careful when scaling characters.
If it isn't, I think you would have easily answered my questions. In addition to being arbitrary, it's pointless and inaccurate because Thor's strength doesn't vary canonically, he just holds back for moral reasons. It further complicates the scaling of comics which is already complicated.
 
For example, Saitama is not given a "Varies" rating because he often holds back, we don't give him any other tiers when he holds back or holds back less than usual (Serious Punch), but only 4-A because that is his full power.
This is a very poor example because, unlike Thor, Saitama does not have a vast amount of different writers with completely different views of the character they are writing for.
 
This is a very poor example because, unlike Thor, Saitama does not have a vast amount of different writers with completely different views of the character they are writing for.
This is not a good argument at all.
We don't use the Varies rating because writers have different views of the power of a DC and Marvel character, it doesn't explain the variation of a character's tier canonically. This is why it is specified on the Hulk, Thor and Superman pages that these latter hold back often as justifications for the Varies rating (even if I don't agree with it as I already mentioned many times), not because the writers have different visions of their power.
 
Am I the only one who thinks that our 5-B characters could use some improvements?
All explanations are quickly dealt with with various scaling chains, with neither scans nor references, which in a way or another end with Hulk.
We could also use some more support feats, as of now the only one, from what I see, is Hulk's meteor. Mind you, I'm not saying it's not valid, just that it seems weird to rely only on that.
 
Let me advertise my latest revision

 
Now to a more difficult question... While I do believe Matthew Malloy can be given a profile considering he was extremely important for a time to multiple characters when he was canon, the issue is where exactly to tier him and who to scale him to ? I think we can scale him really high to be honest.

Firstly, even when Matthew was a Child, Charles Xavier firmly believed no one he knew could stand up to the power Matthew was unleashing and that he was a threat to the entire world, the Avengers included. It even showed Jean Grey , Hulk, and several others getting instantly destroyed in Xavier's view of what would happen to them if they encountered Matthew. Charles Xavier even doubled down in saying Child Matthew held more power than any he had ever faced, confirming his supremacy over everything Charles knows of , describing his destructive power as turning the entire world inside out.

Malloy has several goat quotes at the time (More powerful than any mutant the X-Men had ever seen, a power so great none of us can even hope to understand, is a power no human can ever hope to control, etc ) , Maria Hill heavily implied sending the Avengers was something they absolutely shouldn't do, implying they'd get murked.

Based on all of this, I genuinely think Malloy is 1-A. Even as a Child Malloy was > Anything Charles Xavier ever faced or known about, and he got even stronger as time went on as mutants tend to do and as was proven with how his powers developed even with all of the psychic inhibitors to them Xavier put. His powers disregard the laws of physics, time and space, as well as being superior to every other mutant ever known by the X-Men at the time. It all seems really blatant to me.
Relying on statements and estimations alone isn't enough, plus matt was literally defeated by time travel, if his so called powers disregard the laws of times why he didn't simply survive?.
 
Am I the only one who thinks that our 5-B characters could use some improvements?
All explanations are quickly dealt with with various scaling chains, with neither scans nor references, which in a way or another end with Hulk.
We could also use some more support feats, as of now the only one, from what I see, is Hulk's meteor. Mind you, I'm not saying it's not valid, just that it seems weird to rely only on that.
Might be able to scale thing to SS a bit. And I think there’s a feat of thing tanking blasters planet busting beams or whatever
 
Might be able to scale thing to SS a bit. And I think there’s a feat of thing tanking blasters planet busting beams or whatever
Yes, the Thing has withstood planet-destroying energy beams from both Galactus and on some other occasion if I remember correctly. 🙏
 
Am I the only one who thinks that our 5-B characters could use some improvements?
All explanations are quickly dealt with with various scaling chains, with neither scans nor references, which in a way or another end with Hulk.
We could also use some more support feats, as of now the only one, from what I see, is Hulk's meteor. Mind you, I'm not saying it's not valid, just that it seems weird to rely only on that.
We don't have a lot of supporting feats for other tiers too, not just 5-B. The most well made part we got "covered" is tier 1 stuff while we are lacking with street level to low heralds.

Unrelated note but I might revamp Count Nefaria's profile after all. I'm a little bored and got some spared time to revamp someone.
 
We don't have a lot of supporting feats for other tiers too, not just 5-B. The most well made part we got "covered" is tier 1 stuff while we are lacking with street level to low heralds.

Unrelated note but I might revamp Count Nefaria's profile after all. I'm a little bored and got some spared time to revamp someone.
Should Count Nefaria get higher Herald scaling or is he already at his peak
 
Should Count Nefaria get higher Herald scaling or is he already at his peak
I think so, or at least a "possibly" for it. He's pretty consistently shown to be a teambuster and is shown to be well above the likes of Thor and Hulk, and the phrasing on a lot of his feats/statements indicates to me that he's not just above them when they are holding back.
 
I think so, or at least a "possibly" for it. He's pretty consistently shown to be a teambuster and is shown to be well above the likes of Thor and Hulk, and the phrasing on a lot of his feats/statements indicates to me that he's not just above them when they are holding back.
Weren't he and Thor comparable during their original fight? I extremely strongly doubt that he could survive Thor's strongest attacks. Nefaria definitely needs a tiering upgrade in our page for him though.
 
Does anyone here know anything about Ares? Would he scale to Low 1-C or 3-C?
Well, I think that he has been effortlessly beaten by Hulk, Sentry, Thor, and so onwards, and is officially (according to the handbooks) supposed to be weaker than the Thing and Wonder Man.
 
Well, I think that he has been effortlessly beaten by Hulk, Sentry, Thor, and so onwards, and is officially (according to the handbooks) supposed to be weaker than the Thing and Wonder Man.
Ares generally has really clear scaling to Hercules and has fought a LOT of heralds
 
How come one of the most iconic X-Men villains don't have profiles ?

s-l1200.jpg
A few people, myself included, once attempted to make a profile, but the main obstacle has been the difficulty of properly distinguish between various models of Sentinels, since it is often not explicitated.
The old attempted tried to split them into keys for each model, but perhaps a better solution may be to treat them as a sort of race/population, collective profile.

Might be able to scale thing to SS a bit. And I think there’s a feat of thing tanking blasters planet busting beams or whatever
I honestly don't believe we should scale the Thing to SS, he for sure isn't galaxy level, let alone low 1-C. Maybe earlier depictions, perhaps, but that may fall into writing inconsistencies or still unestablished (not that they now are tbh) power levels.
Planetary is already more reasonable, it would be great if we could find them.
 
I honestly don't believe we should scale the Thing to SS, he for sure isn't galaxy level, let alone low 1-C. Maybe earlier depictions, perhaps, but that may fall into writing inconsistencies or still unestablished (not that they now are tbh) power levels.
Planetary is already more reasonable, it would be great if we could find them.
debatable, pretty sure Ben gets stronger as he ages plus there was that weird spike amp he got
 
A few people, myself included, once attempted to make a profile, but the main obstacle has been the difficulty of properly distinguish between various models of Sentinels, since it is often not explicitated.
The old attempted tried to split them into keys for each model, but perhaps a better solution may be to treat them as a sort of race/population, collective profile.
At least making a Nimrod profile should be easy enough given there's like only like Two of them to my knowledge that are the "main ones"
 
I remember that during World War Hulk, when he met with the Hulk, he said that to prevent innocents from being hurt Hulk was able to see the world the same way as him, wouldn't that give Hulk analytical prediction and information analysis+Genius intelligence?
 
Idk, I got lost in catching up with some post-WWH and Fall of the Hulks comics I never read, so I haven't encountered such a statement, but maybe I'll do.
Btw, Red Hulk is really unsufferable, he's such a Mary Sue in everything and his writing is so directionless, at least from Hulk vol 2 onwards, I'm at issue 15, I hope it gets better later.
 
Idk, I got lost in catching up with some post-WWH and Fall of the Hulks comics I never read, so I haven't encountered such a statement, but maybe I'll do.
It happens in Incredible Hulk vol 2 #108, during the WWH


Btw, Red Hulk is really unsufferable, he's such a Mary Sue in everything and his writing is so directionless, at least from Hulk vol 2 onwards, I'm at issue 15, I hope it gets better later.
I was reading all the old comics after the first Secret Wars, I almost arrived at the second one but the site where I was reading them exploded, now I have to get Marvel Unlimited to continue
 
It was probably referring to Amadeus Cho. 🙏
 
Btw this thread here says that this won't affect other street levels, but that's untrue, lmao. Scaling will be affected and a few characters that are merely bullet timers will be upgraded.


Also Spidey holding back in SPEED? That's funny. (I won't comment there because admins already approved so meh)
 
Btw this thread here says that this won't affect other street levels, but that's untrue, lmao. Scaling will be affected and a few characters that are merely bullet timers will be upgraded.


Also Spidey holding back in SPEED? That's funny. (I won't comment there because admins already approved so meh)
There are many characters scaling here, many of which are scaling directly or indirectly to spider man so if they don't properly discuss who scales and who doesn't this is just another mess that no one will be able to fix.
 
Back
Top