- 1,576
- 1,161
Consistent with Hidan>Matatabi
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Consistent with Hidan>Matatabi
-Consistent with Hidan>Matatabi
So,damage, slayer, and shadow are locking me in the basement forcing me to make this thread, this is a cry for help
I mean there's no way to determine which is more accurate the low or high end, expect for the fact that the anime supports it being entirely uncharged (aka low end). So, it's either, both are valid average em, or anime supports low end use that one.I feel like almost everyone is saying they're fine with either low end or average
I'm obviously okay with this myself, but I still think we should consult with a few CGMs just to be on the safe side. I don't think any of us would want to revise the profiles again in a month or two if someone suddenly finds issue with the method we've chosen. I'd rather we definitively settle this right now.Looks like we should go with the low end for now.
YesIs this calc stacking?
Pixel scaling over several steps is permitted, as long as the size of the scaled objects usually stays constant.
It wouldn't fall under that.I think this is calc stacking
Now I'm not sure if it falls under this:
Only parameters that can't change between calculations can be re-purposed.
Well, but we know for a fact that Bee's attack against the shibaku tensei is the lowest his power can get, so wouldn't the low end be safe to use?It wouldn't fall under that.
If it was allowed, it would fall under this:
Where it could be argued that since it's the same attack, generated by the same character, then the value of it would stay the same between calculations and it could be used to calc 8-Tails' durability.
The low end is what has currently been accepted anyway, which is a different point to whether the method should be allowed at all.Well, but we know for a fact that Bee's attack against the shibaku tensei is the lowest his power can get, so wouldn't the low end be safe to use?
I was refering to the rule you postedThe low end is what has currently been accepted anyway, which is a different point to whether the method should be allowed at all.
Only parameters that can't change between calculations can be re-purposed.
We can do that. I just thought the calculation for his durability was neater.If it’s calc stacking why not just downscale to 4.3 GT?
I agree, I just don’t care to die on a 1 GT difference of a hill lolWe can do that. I just thought the calculation for his durability was neater.
I was locked in a basement with skim milk and white bread for nurishmentthen why did you make the thread mrk
Arc is a passive cute little femboy who obeys anyonethen why did you make the thread mrk
From a 15.55 gigaton calc? That’s a 3.6x difference, why would we downscale that much?If it’s calc stacking why not just downscale to 4.3 GT?
Because it's better than outright scaling him fully to the calc, especially when we've shown through a calc that the amount of the blast that the Eight-Tails was hit by was not that high.From a 15.55 gigaton calc? That’s a 3.6x difference, why would we downscale that much?
It’s not much better, they’re both bad ideas.Because it's better than outright scaling him fully to the calc, especially when we've shown through a calc that the amount of the blast that the Eight-Tails was hit by was not that high.
Have to work with the least bad idea here, as far as I can see them.It’s not much better, they’re both bad ideas.
I feel like the best idea would be a combination like “At least [whatever, probably SM Naruto’s Rasenshuriken calc], at most [Bijuudama calc]”, not just picking one extreme over another.Have to work with the least bad idea here, as far as I can see them.
I don't think that would help here.I feel like the best idea would be a combination like “At least [whatever, probably SM Naruto’s Rasenshuriken calc], at most [Bijuudama calc]”, not just picking one extreme over another.
It's supported by the calc. Now, while it is calc stacking, we can still see that the Gyuki withstands like a third of his Bijuudama. And when we downscale we go to the baseline of a tier. Like 1 Yottaton would downscale to baseline 5-B+, or 100 Zettatons would downscale to baseline 5-B.From a 15.55 gigaton calc? That’s a 3.6x difference, why would we downscale that much?
BASEDdang, gyuki getting packed by sage naruto smh
Why would Gyūki scale below Sage Naruto’s calc thoI think that 4.3 is our best option, if we can't get 5.2 accepted.
When it’s close to baseline, yeah. If it’s a significant difference, like it is here, we would typically use At most ratings.And when we downscale we go to the baseline of a tier.