• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Can 4D AP negate 3D AE,NEP,TD etc.?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nop, But he can destroy the reality where this guys are, so they die by domino effect If they don't have a feat from survive when the universe explode
 
Dragonite007 said:
Nop, But he can destroy the reality where this guys are, so they die by domino effect If they don't have a feat from survive when the universe explode
Click to expand...
So they gotta nuke the place? For AE and stuff?
 
Larssx said:
I didn't say that.
But I said this
Someone with 4D ap can easily affect someone with 3D Ae 1.
Click to expand...
Thats literally what I said. 4D AP means you cna effect 3D AE. Which means you have NPI.
 
ShionAH said:
Yes. The reason of effect is 4D AP. Which is basically used as NPI here.
Click to expand...
This really have nothing to do with Npi
Anyway, as a result, if I come to your question, someone with a high-dimensional ap can affect people like Ae Td, For nep 2 context is important.
 
Larssx said:
This really have nothing to do with Npi
Anyway, as a result, if I come to your question, someone with a high-dimensional ap can affect people like Ae Td, For nep 2 context is important.
Click to expand...
Nop, can't. You can have 1-A AP but still not touching in AE1, Nep
 
Dragonite007 said:
Nop, can't. You can have 1-A AP but still not touching in AE1, Nep
Click to expand...
Lol?
This is completly wrong
If there is no extra context for AE or Nep against high dimensional ap they are affected.
Ae1 is still in front of you, this is completely blocked with a high dimensional ap
Nep just stands on a different plane
If there is no extra context in the nep, it is ignored by the High dimensional ap.
 
Larssx said:
Lol?
This is completly wrong
If there is no extra context for AE or Nep against high dimensional ap they are affected.
Ae1 is still in front of you, this is completely blocked with a high dimensional ap
Nep just stands on a different plane
If there is no extra context in the nep, it is ignored by the High dimensional ap.
Click to expand...
High dimensional ap is not ignorinf NEP and AE1.

The High dimensional ap needs extra context to prove that can interact with them
 
Dragonite007 said:
High dimensional ap is not ignorinf NEP and AE1.

The High dimensional ap needs extra context to prove that can interact with them
Click to expand...
Dude, if you have high dimensional ap you can interact with them, at least you can definitely affect AE 1.
For Nep, context is more involved.
You will probably just keep repeating what you wrote so I don't want to deal with it.
 
Larssx said:
Dude, if you have high dimensional ap you can interact with them, at least you can definitely affect AE 1.
Click to expand...
"affecting them requires the ability to affect directly the abstraction itself"

Idk...
 
Larssx said:
Dude, if you have high dimensional ap you can interact with them, at least you can definitely affect AE 1.
For Nep, context is more involved.
You will probably just keep repeating what you wrote so I don't want to deal with it.
Click to expand...
Man, NEP and AE1 are not related to dimensionality. High Dimension AP is not bypass this
 
Larssx said:
Dude, if you have high dimensional ap you can interact with them, at least you can definitely affect AE 1.
For Nep, context is more involved.
You will probably just keep repeating what you wrote so I don't want to deal with it.
Click to expand...
You are wrong. Dragonite is correct.

So, since the question got answered, need this closed?
 
The person who updated and edited these pages was already DT. And now any 4D AP, existence or hax can negate hax like a NEP2 or TD3 with 3D capabilities in verse. Because a 4D hax or AP will crush NEP2 running in 3D like a pressure against its energy, and anyone who has NEP2 is technically considered "dead" (he doesn't actually die or perish but is technically "dead" as there's no room for movement).
 
Georredannea15 said:
Because a 4D hax or AP will crush NEP2 running in 3D like a pressure against its energy, and anyone who has NEP2 is technically considered "dead" (he doesn't actually die or perish but is technically "dead" as there's no room for movement).
Click to expand...
Pretty sure he meant something like "If a 4D character fights a 3D character with NEP 2, the 4D will win since the other one won't be able to effect him."
 
Georredannea15 said:
The person who updated and edited these pages was already DT. And now any 4D AP, existence or hax can negate hax like a NEP2 or TD3 with 3D capabilities in verse. Because a 4D hax or AP will crush NEP2 running in 3D like a pressure against its energy, and anyone who has NEP2 is technically considered "dead" (he doesn't actually die or perish but is technically "dead" as there's no room for movement).
Click to expand...
The actual statement:
Note: The aspects in which a character is not nonexistent in the common sense are what makes them into a 'living' character. As such, if a character with this power is reduced to a state in which they can't display any properties of something that exists (e.g. becomes unable to take any actions), they are effectively dead/erased. A consequence of that is that feats or special reasoning are required for a character with this ability to survive the complete erasure of their plane of existence, as one needs to confirm that they are able to still display some existent properties on a different plane of existence.
Click to expand...

Dragonite007 said:
Nop, But he can destroy the reality where this guys are, so they die by domino effect If they don't have a feat from survive when the universe explode
Click to expand...
This is correct.
 
Georredannea15 said:
The person who updated and edited these pages was already DT. And now any 4D AP, existence or hax can negate hax like a NEP2 or TD3 with 3D capabilities in verse. Because a 4D hax or AP will crush NEP2 running in 3D like a pressure against its energy, and anyone who has NEP2 is technically considered "dead" (he doesn't actually die or perish but is technically "dead" as there's no room for movement).
Click to expand...
that just tells me you have no idea what you're talking about.

Its not crush NEP2 running in 3D like a pressure against its energ. They have to destroy the plane where the NEP is to consider he dead that if not have feats to survive the destruction of his plane
 
Dragonite007 said:
that just tells me you have no idea what you're talking about.

Its not crush NEP2 running in 3D like a pressure against its energ. They have to destroy the plane where the NEP is to consider he dead that if not have feats to survive the destruction of his plane
Click to expand...
Please ask DT. Learn how hax like AE and NEP can now be negate by higher dimensionality
 
"Note: The aspects in which a character is not nonexistent in the common sense are what makes them into a 'living' character. As such, if a character with this power is reduced to a state in which they can't display any properties of something that exists (e.g. becomes unable to take any actions), they are effectively dead/erased. A consequence of that is that feats or special reasoning are required for a character with this ability to survive the complete erasure of their plane of existence, as one needs to confirm that they are able to still display some existent properties on a different plane of existence."

This is talking about HDE btw.
 
Larssx said:
By the way, I must mention that I don't like your attitude here.
Is it only your comment that determines whether this is true or not?
Click to expand...
You don't need to like my attitude.

No, but I considered things to be very straightforward. Upon closer inspection, I suppose full clarification is warranted.

So, upon your request: @DontTalkDT your help is needed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Exoko
What can counter NEP Type 2?
Replies
12
Views
1K
Exoko
Exoko
Johner2133451
Can someone with Madness Manip type 3 effect characters with abstract existence or NEP?
Replies
5
Views
769
MrTayman616
MrTayman616
Lycoris4812
Can This Be Used For AP?
Replies
5
Views
712
Lycoris4812
Lycoris4812
Aaaaa11112222
Can 4D AP bypass Type 2 Conceptual Manipulation?
Replies
23
Views
3K
TheOrangeGuy09
TheOrangeGuy09
ReaperAndBlues
How Far Can Type 1 AE bs a match?
Replies
7
Views
1K
ActuallySpaceMan42
ActuallySpaceMan42
Back
Top