Computer analytical prediction vs the average analytical prediction.

[Greatsage13th]

So a computer in the 1900s managed to calculate over 200 possible moves in chess. Would a computer based analytical prediction beat a normal analytical prediction user?

 

[GilverTheProtoAngelo]

Doesn't matter who performs it. All that matters is what feats of analytical prediction are performed.

 

[Greatsage13th]

Doesn't matter who performs it. All that matters is what feats of analytical prediction are performed.

The question is can 200 million possible moves in chess be compared to someone who can predict 1000 moves in a fight.

 

[GilverTheProtoAngelo]

Depends on speed of predictions.
And also an A.I designed to predict chess moves may or may not be able to predict real life stuff. Its all dependent on how the A.I is designed. Its certainly impressive.. and if the predictions extend to real life combat then it's certainly better than someone who can predict 1000 moves.

 

[Greatsage13th]

Depends on speed of predictions.
And also an A.I designed to predict chess moves may or may not be able to predict real life stuff. Its all dependent on how the A.I is designed. Its certainly impressive.. and if the predictions extend to real life combat then it's certainly better than someone who can predict 1000 moves.

Well...if that's the case...then... Sasaki Kojirou's analytical prediction seems to have gone to moot against quantum computer levels of analytical prediction.

 

[GilverTheProtoAngelo]

Well...if that's the case...then... Sasaki Kojirou's analytical prediction seems to have gone to moot against quantum computer levels of analytical prediction.

Don't quite rule out human ingenuity. There are humans in real life who blur the difference between machinist precision versus human instinct and talent. I believe there are cases of humans winning against A.I in chess or atleast give difficult matches despite what logic would dictate. Such events occur in fiction even more frequently and in over the top fashion.

 

[Greatsage13th]

Don't quite rule out human ingenuity. There are humans in real life who blur the difference between machinist precision versus human instinct and talent. I believe there are cases of humans winning against A.I in chess or atleast give difficult matches despite what logic would dictate. Such events occur in fiction even more frequently and in over the top fashion.

I mean, yeah, Agent Zain is one of those guys. Which gives him extraordinary genius intelligence.