• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Is is TD 2?

Sniper670

He/Him
Messages
6,409
Reaction score
1,367
"to dialetheic systems of logic, or are portrayed as existing within a state of single, indivisible wholeness bereft of any separation."

This was under type 3 which is reserved for 1A and I was wondering if it's type 2 if you're not 1A
 
"to dialetheic systems of logic, or are portrayed as existing within a state of single, indivisible wholeness bereft of any separation."

This was under type 3 which is reserved for 1A and I was wondering if it's type 2 if you're not 1A
It's impossible to get Type 3 or 4 without being 1-A or above, so anything that would qualify for them would automatically be debunked to Type 2. It's why Transduality can't give you a tier.
 
I see, well it seems TD won't be restricted to tiers anymore so I guess type 3 will work once it's finalized
 
Bump.

Anyway, I was wondering whether it was verse specific or a character of that nature qualifies for Acausality 5 or Nonexistent physiology type 2, or both by default
 
Bump.

Anyway, I was wondering whether it was verse specific or a character of that nature qualifies for Acausality 5 or Nonexistent physiology type 2, or both by default
NEP Type 2 is given by default of having TD 2 and up, however, Cause and Effect are not considered a duality by default of the wiki.

So if there are no notes of Cause and Effect being a duality in the verse you would only get NEP Type 2 from TD 2.
 
"to dialetheic systems of logic, or are portrayed as existing within a state of single, indivisible wholeness bereft of any separation."

This was under type 3 which is reserved for 1A and I was wondering if it's type 2 if you're not 1A
type 3 being for 1-A only / a stepladder to 1-A is no longer the case
 
That begs the question, how will we know the difference between type 2 and 3 then.

Looking at both definitions, type 3 and type 2 are quite different in what they can do
 
NEP Type 2 is given by default of having TD 2 and up, however, Cause and Effect are not considered a duality by default of the wiki.

So if there are no notes of Cause and Effect being a duality in the verse you would only get NEP Type 2 from TD 2.
I see.... Do such characters get immunity to everything dualistic by default, or do we go by the duality the verse displays
 
I see.... Do such characters get immunity to everything dualistic by default, or do we go by the duality the verse displays
By default, I believe so. It also works pretty much like immunity from everything present in the verse, though it gets a bit NFL-like if you say it includes a unique dual system from another verse.
 
By default, I believe so. It also works pretty much like immunity from everything present in the verse, though it gets a bit NFL-like if you say it includes a unique dual system from another verse.
Huh, we're going a bit overboard by saying it would be immune to all possible dualities when X verse has barely shown 1 or 2 set of dualities, by default it should be only those that the verse has shown.
 
Huh, we're going a bit overboard by saying it would be immune to all possible dualities when X verse has barely shown 1 or 2 set of dualities, by default it should be only those that the verse has shown.
That's why I said not unique dualities. Like some verses with Transduality may not have the concept of magic so they also wouldn't have the duality of Magical & Non-Magical. But basic stuff like Fire & Water, Hot & Cold, can be granted even if it's not shown.
 
That's why I said not unique dualities. Like some verses with Transduality may not have the concept of magic so they also wouldn't have the duality of Magical & Non-Magical. But basic stuff like Fire & Water, Hot & Cold, can be granted even if it's not shown.
Even taking into account something so basic, not all verses portray some obvious things as dualities, they always do it explicitly with the ones they want to imply as dualities. This can be obviated when we know that something in specific (as for example, a concept, an order) is a duality and that there are countless of those dualities and that it has its opposite and that each one is something different from the previous one. example, Causality, Laws, Concepts, Magic, Destruction, Chaos, Creation, Existence, Non-existence and so on. Why do I give these examples as if they were dualities? Because there are verses that treat them as dualities, and not only simple dualities, but dualities at the conceptual level and even more.
 
Even taking into account something so basic, not all verses portray some obvious things as dualities, they always do it explicitly with the ones they want to imply as dualities. This can be obviated when we know that something in specific (as for example, a concept, an order) is a duality and that there are countless of those dualities and that it has its opposite and that each one is something different from the previous one. example, Causality, Laws, Concepts, Magic, Destruction, Chaos, Creation, Existence, Non-existence and so on. Why do I give these examples as if they were dualities? Because there are verses that treat them as dualities, and not only simple dualities, but dualities at the conceptual level and even more.
That's fair, though if your getting Transduality Type 2 I would imagine it would be valid enough to cover the most basic dualities since its main requirement is based on transcending all dualities/concepts on an entire level of reality. The words "All" or "Every" gives a rough amount of freedom but in the end, it's up to us to use common sense when it comes to stuff it does and doesn't include.
 
Even taking into account something so basic, not all verses portray some obvious things as dualities, they always do it explicitly with the ones they want to imply as dualities. This can be obviated when we know that something in specific (as for example, a concept, an order) is a duality and that there are countless of those dualities and that it has its opposite and that each one is something different from the previous one. example, Causality, Laws, Concepts, Magic, Destruction, Chaos, Creation, Existence, Non-existence and so on. Why do I give these examples as if they were dualities? Because there are verses that treat them as dualities, and not only simple dualities, but dualities at the conceptual level and even more.

We have 2 cases of Duality

Anos tranduality is conditional, in that it requires specific conditions, because of order, and we know order aren't infinite, so we'll go by the order shown

And then we have characters who reject the very concept of duplicity. That was for type 3. Being in a state of indivisible wholeness. The very concept of being dual doesn't apply because it will turn into a value that is neither true, nor false.

They'll be immune to anything shown in the verse that is a Duality irl.
 
That's fair, though if your getting Transduality Type 2 I would imagine it would be valid enough to cover the most basic dualities since its main requirement is based on transcending all dualities/concepts on an entire level of reality. The words "All" or "Every" gives a rough amount of freedom but in the end, it's up to us to use common sense when it comes to stuff it does and doesn't include.
How you explain it is how it works
 
Anos tranduality is conditional, in that it requires specific conditions, because of order, and we know order aren't infinite, so we'll go by the order shown
No, we have countless. And every order (Law/Cm/Duality) is on a conceptual level, and he transcends, lacks and is unbound from all those countless dualities, and far above dualities is reason/logic and far above reason/logic is Anos' source and or a hypothetical true nature, Graham' true nature, MEoCD & Venuz. Already as DT said some time ago, TD is a power logic-based power, and MG's reason/logic shows the ability to surpass and manipulate that same TD.
it's up to us to use common sense when it comes to stuff it does and doesn't include.
Yeah this
 
No, we have countless. And every order (Law/Cm/Duality) is on a conceptual level, and he transcends and is unbound from all countless dualities, and far above dualities is reason/logic and far above reason/logic is Anos, Graham, MEoCD & Venuz.
It's still not infinite. So he'll have his ass handed to to him if the specific order isn't noted.

Me personally I highly suspect he's not "immune" to duality.

But I'll make my time to read the novels myself
Yeah this
What does it change? It doesn't help your case at all
 
It's still not infinite. So he'll have his ass handed to to him if the specific order isn't noted.
You brought Anos here...and I'm not even defending, just correcting.
Me personally I highly suspect he's not "immune" to duality.
Already as DT said some time ago, TD is a logic-based power, and MG's reason/logic has shown the ability to surpass and manipulate that same TD.
The order that is duality can not affect Anos or Graham, it has been said many times, that lacks, unbound and transcend the order, and only Venuz, MEoCD that can manipulate the logic can destroy them and Eques has feats of negating those natures, that's why he has Aca and TD Negation.
But I'll make my time to read the novels myself
Sure, we would be more than grateful to have someone else read the novel here and even if you read it to be an opponent, I'll have someone to argue with so I win.
What does it change? It doesn't help your case at all
I only agree with what he said
 
You brought Anos here...and I'm not even defending, just correcting.
I'm using him here because I'm pretty sure you're using it as a blueprint to judge all Transdual characters, when you don't even know how it really works in the grand scheme of things.

Anyway, I already asked udlmaster who's knowledgeable about TD so I'm out of this thread
The order that is duality can not affect Anos or Graham, it has been said many times, that lacks, unbound and transcend the order, and only Venuz, MEoCD that can manipulate the logic can destroy them and Eques has feats to negate those natures, for something has Aca and TD Negation.
The book will tell me whether Anos is transdual or not.
Sure, we would be more than grateful to have someone else read the novel here and even if you read it to be an opponent, I'll have someone to argue with so I win.
Sure
I only agree with what he said
Alright
 
I'm using him here because I'm pretty sure you're using it as a blueprint to judge all Transdual characters, when you don't even know how it really works in the grand scheme of things.
There you are incorrect, because I carry the same logic even before Anos had TD, even I opposed it and called it a wank. It just so happens that Anos now has TD and everyone relates it to him. The main problem comes when one believes that everything shown in a verse is a duality and that everything is related to a duality for one's own taste, e.g. if a character happens to meet a small description of an ability, then it would gain the ability and it is not so, if he does not meet the full requirement of the ability and just happens to match a piece of text then it cannot be given.
The book will tell me whether Anos is transdual or not.
Go ahead, you should know that both myself and Null are the strictest members regarding MG' reliability and agreed to accept it even when we called it wank, so you are free to try.
 
Yes. You basically confirmed I can't take your opinions seriously anymore. You don't even understand the basic idea about NonDuality Transduality. You're literally arguing against Taiji here

I'll wait for udlmaster. Sorry man, but you don't know what you're talking about
 
Yes. You basically confirmed I can't take your opinions seriously anymore. You don't even understand the basic idea about NonDuality Transduality. You're literally arguing against Taiji here
As you wish, we will see who is right in the end and remember to google more crazy terms next time, sayonara.
 
Back
Top