• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

About burning bones

SamanPatou

VS Battles
Administrator
Messages
9,900
Reaction score
9,173
How much damage does "normal fire" to bones, normally?
Because I was in doubt about whether or not the following sentence was proof of heat/fire resistance:

After a time, the King grew bored with this torment and ordered Spinal to burn himself alive as a final rite of purification in penance for his crimes. While his flesh melted away, Spinal’s skeleton remained, and even when the Mask was removed from his seared and smoking skull, there yet persisted a will and a force that moved the bones, however feeble it might be.

For further context, Spinal is a living skeleton, and his bones don't seem to have suffered any notable damage, and the text also seemingly implies that the bones remaining unscathed by the fire is an extraordinary event.
 
I mean cremation exists so that means that the skeleton guy has resistance to fire manipulation/ heat manipulation
 
Doesn't cremation reach particularly high temperatures?

Spinal burned himself alive in ancient Babylon, when they didn't have modern means to burn people. Would that still be comparable to what modern cremation does?
 
Doesn't cremation reach particularly high temperatures?

Spinal burned himself alive in ancient Babylon, when they didn't have modern means to burn people. Would that still be comparable to what modern cremation does?
idk, most likely. I've seen statements that they burn at 1292 farenheit but idk if i should trust that
 
Rather than resistance to heat, it may simple means that the flames weren't hot enough to reduce the bones to ashes (the text does not says it uses modern methods of cremation).
 
Rather than resistance to heat, it may simple means that the flames weren't hot enough to reduce the bones to ashes (the text does not says it uses modern methods of cremation).
That was my point, it couldn't be a modern method as it happened in ancient Babylon, but I wasn't sure if "common fire" (I don't know how to call it, but you get it) could do significant damage to the bones.
 
Back
Top