• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Berkeley Cardinals

no ******* clue. All I know is that they are on some beyond transcendent of ultra manifold level
 
Simply put, how do Berkeley Cardinals even work?
I am unaware of the specifics especially because I don't have years of knowledge on set theory, but they're just the biggest kind of large cardinal, to the point where 0 = 1 axiom begins to fail. So yeah timeless is pretty much right, they're incredibly so much higher than Woodin Cardinals.
 
Absolute Infinity can't really be applied to a tier due to it being bigger than any number or anything that can be conceptualized using mathematics. So it would be on the level of the Mathiverse, which itself can't be applied to a tier (the tier 0 rating is a server understatement). Extended modal realism is... weird
 
there's different axioms for absolute infinity, ZFC has one, NBG set theory as well, Von neumann universe of sets as well, 0=1 axiom ETC
But that's for another day.

Also yeah I guess extended modal realism is > it, assuming that it's > type 4 multiverse which is likely equal to Ultimate V=L Conjecture, which states no infinity can reach it.
 
why is it called suicide cardinal?
Mainly a reference to the legend of Icarus where he flew so close to the sun, it essentially was an act of suicide. (In math terms, its equivalent is transcending so many degrees of infinity to such an absurd degree enters such a paradoxical environment it breaks anything down. Which is important because of cataphysics being the defiance of nature.)
 
Mainly a reference to the legend of Icarus where he flew so close to the sun, it essentially was an act of suicide. (In math terms, its equivalent is transcending so many degrees of infinity to such an absurd degree enters such a paradoxical environment it breaks anything down. Which is important because of cataphysics being the defiance of nature.)
I see
 
how does the icarus set compare to thinks like rank-into-rank cardinals and Berkeley cardinals
 
how does the icarus set compare to thinks like rank-into-rank cardinals and Berkeley cardinals
Well it is purely defined as anything beyond Rank-Into-Rank (I0-I3) since it already breaks down 0=1 theorem which is > the former.
But yeah like i said, an icarus sets purpose to be as high as something can get in set theory. Though it'd be much easier to dm the explanations.
 
Back
Top