Would this be High 1-B?

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

There's a hierarchy with an infinite number of dimensions. A higher dimension within this hierarchy infinitely transcends a lower one to the point of viewing said lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent basically.

Would this qualify for High 1-B?

 

[PrinceofPein]

Yes that is High 1B

 

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

Yes that is High 1B

Okay, thanks.

 

[Delta333]

Definitely High 1-B

 

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

If the "infinitely" was removed would it still be High 1-B?

Like this: "There's a hierarchy with an infinite number of dimensions. A higher dimension within this hierarchy transcends a lower one to the point of viewing said lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent basically."

 

[Catzlaflame]

If the "infinitely" was removed would it still be High 1-B?

Like this: "There's a hierarchy with an infinite number of dimensions. A higher dimension within this hierarchy transcends a lower one to the point of viewing said lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent basically."

it’s still high-1B

 

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

I see, thank you.

 

[Galaxi789]

There's a hierarchy with an infinite number of dimensions. A higher dimension within this hierarchy infinitely transcends a lower one to the point of viewing said lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent basically.

Would this qualify for High 1-B?

Verse

 

[GreatIskandar14045]

If the "infinitely" was removed would it still be High 1-B?

Like this: "There's a hierarchy with an infinite number of dimensions. A higher dimension within this hierarchy transcends a lower one to the point of viewing said lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent basically."

Not really, the statement above doesn't imply a qualitative superiority in existential status, so no, it is not High 1-B.

Likewise, trivializing the lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent (0), flat, et cetera, are basically how the higher dimensions treat the lower dimensions in general (assuming they aren't compactified). Because higher dimensions have additional dimensions that the lower dimensions do not have, which extends the lower dimensions into more uncountably infinite amount. For example: length is made from uncountaby infinite points being lined up.

But as Ultima wrote in the Tiering System FAQ, having an uncountably infinitely larger volume (as a higher-dimension object) doesn't translate as uncountably infinitely stronger power-wise, either. Because mass (which is the thing that is relevant to power scaling, see KE or PE) is entirely a separated quantity from the object's inherent spatial dimensions. Higher-dimensional beings can be both weaker and stronger than the lower dimensions, and it does make sense.

So it is just Higher-Dimensional Existence in infinite-dimensional level. Not something Tier 1 or whatnot.

 

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

Not really, the statement above doesn't imply a qualitative superiority in existential status, so no, it is not High 1-B.

Likewise, trivializing the lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent (0), flat, et cetera, are basically how the higher dimensions treat the lower dimensions in general (assuming they aren't compactified). Because higher dimensions have additional dimensions that the lower dimensions do not have, which extends the lower dimensions into more uncountably infinite amount. For example: length is made from uncountaby infinite points being lined up.

But as Ultima wrote in the Tiering System FAQ, having an uncountably infinitely larger volume (as a higher-dimension object) doesn't translate as uncountably infinitely stronger power-wise, either. Because mass (which is the thing that is relevant to power scaling, see KE or PE) is entirely a separated quantity from the object's inherent spatial dimensions. Higher-dimensional beings can be both weaker and stronger than the lower dimensions, and it does make sense.

So it is just Higher-Dimensional Existence in infinite-dimensional level. Not something Tier 1 or whatnot.

So, without the "infinitely transcends" part it would not be High 1-B but with it, it is?

 

[GreatIskandar14045]

So, without the "infinitely transcends" part it would not be High 1-B but with it, it is?

For this case, yeah.

 

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

Got it. Thanks.

 

[JmikaelP]

Not really, the statement above doesn't imply a qualitative superiority in existential status, so no, it is not High 1-B.

Likewise, trivializing the lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent (0), flat, et cetera, are basically how the higher dimensions treat the lower dimensions in general (assuming they aren't compactified). Because higher dimensions have additional dimensions that the lower dimensions do not have, which extends the lower dimensions into more uncountably infinite amount. For example: length is made from uncountaby infinite points being lined up.

But as Ultima wrote in the Tiering System FAQ, having an uncountably infinitely larger volume (as a higher-dimension object) doesn't translate as uncountably infinitely stronger power-wise, either. Because mass (which is the thing that is relevant to power scaling, see KE or PE) is entirely a separated quantity from the object's inherent spatial dimensions. Higher-dimensional beings can be both weaker and stronger than the lower dimensions, and it does make sense.

So it is just Higher-Dimensional Existence in infinite-dimensional level. Not something Tier 1 or whatnot.

Then, if exist a verse where his description is: "The example verse is composed by infinite dimension, where the lowers dimension cannot understand the higher dimensions and where the higher dimension see the lower ones like fiction" This verse wont be a High 1-B

 

[AKUTO123]

Not really, the statement above doesn't imply a qualitative superiority in existential status, so no, it is not High 1-B.

Likewise, trivializing the lower dimensions as insignificant, nonexistent (0), flat, et cetera, are basically how the higher dimensions treat the lower dimensions in general (assuming they aren't compactified). Because higher dimensions have additional dimensions that the lower dimensions do not have, which extends the lower dimensions into more uncountably infinite amount. For example: length is made from uncountaby infinite points being lined up.

But as Ultima wrote in the Tiering System FAQ, having an uncountably infinitely larger volume (as a higher-dimension object) doesn't translate as uncountably infinitely stronger power-wise, either. Because mass (which is the thing that is relevant to power scaling, see KE or PE) is entirely a separated quantity from the object's inherent spatial dimensions. Higher-dimensional beings can be both weaker and stronger than the lower dimensions, and it does make sense.

So it is just Higher-Dimensional Existence in infinite-dimensional level. Not something Tier 1 or whatnot.

In fact, it can mean to be infinite in the context of making it unimportant or exceeding, of course, it is necessary to know how this is explained in the series.

 

[Mr._Undetected]

Basically yes

 

[Galaxi789]

Hay una jerarquía con un número infinito de dimensiones. Una dimensión superior dentro de esta jerarquía trasciende infinitamente a una inferior hasta el punto de ver dichas dimensiones inferiores como insignificantes, básicamente inexistentes.

¿Calificaría esto para High 1-B?

what verse is it from

 

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

what verse is it from

I just wanted to generalize and make it easier for me to understand what High 1-B is so there isn't really a verse this is from.