Brown dwarfs are commonly referred to in astronomy circles.
Fair, I just meant that they are all esoteric in nature.
And I'd like to ask you to keep the passive-aggression down. Everyone's allowed to provide their takes on the matter, and basically going "stop giving this opinion I don't like" is ridiculous. It's completely counterintuitive to the nature of a debate.
I think I gave my thoughts already. I'm fine with the change if it's the more accurate term.@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr. Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @Agnaa @Just_a_Random_Butler @DarkGrath @Dereck03
Your input would be very appreciated here.
It is not remotely ridiculous. This discussion has been drawn out long enough, and people using these pointless jabs to get in the way of such a simple accuracy change wastes time that could be spent on more useful projects.
Well, you have people who disagree here including myself hence it isn't "pointless" nor "simple".
A jab that fails to amount to constructive disagreement is pointless, and disagreements that impede a very blatantly needed accuracy change purely on grounds of it not sounding good and the like don't preclude it from being simple.
Or perhaps you should consider being more open to other people's propositions rather than deeming it as "a jab that fails to amount to constructive disagreement", and adamantly think this should undoubtedly pass. Like said before, a lot of effort for a little gain.
I was. Epyriel heard multiple objectors out and addressed all of them. Also, it would absolutely not be a lot of effort. I can write a mass-editing script that'll handle this change in minutes.
I'm telling you now: yes, it is ridiculous. You're trying to tell people "hey, stop disagreeing" as if disagreement isn't part of a debate. You should know by now that my stance has changed to agreement with the thread, but that doesn't exactly change the fact that how you've handled this has been far less than ideal.
Starting your post with "I'm telling you now" and then repeating what you said has zero persuasive value. I'm not deaf to hearing disagreements, but that fact is abused by people who put a jab into a thread that very blatantly does not meaningfully contribute.
You can't police people's sentiments, though, which is kind of what you've been doing with this whole "stop throwing these unnecessary roadblocks" tirade.
I'll leave it here, then. I'm not trying to police sentiments, merely to minimize clutter, even if my tone may have been too harsh.
This is the current tally.
Add me to the disagree section.
It is probably fine for the posts in question to remain. The disagreements were not particularly hostile.
Thank you for the overview.
That is correct, yes.
Thank you very much to Catzlaflame for being willing to help out.
DT’s main objection was the workload, but that has been addressed with Catzlaflame’s offer to do it with a bot.
Since when has being "ascetically pleasing" been a component of rational judgement? The term is accurate, period.
What do you mean?
What scientific article is used to determine the size and mass to calculate "Dwarf Star" Tier?
Currently the AP values being used are from this blog: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Assaltwaffle/New_GBE_Formula:_Revised_Attack_Potency
We currently use the OTS 44. The problem is... That's a brown dwarf, not a dwarf star
No, it doesn’t.
A brown dwarf just objectively isn't a dwarf star, though. Brown dwarves and dwarf stars (one legit doesn't even have "star" in the name) are two different categories
White dwarfs also aren’t stars but rather stellar remnants (the depleted cores of spent stars). Also not sure “dark planet” is supposed to refer to, as brown dwarfs are more massive than any planet. The other two quotes are accurate. Uh, who exactly are you quoting?
I’m sorry, what exactly do you mean by this? Does this mean you agree to the proposed revision to change Tier High 5-A’s name from ‘Dwarf Star level’ to ‘Brown Dwarf level’?
I was just looking at the wiki page for a brief overview.
This has already been discussed, and it's not been favored.
Just giving my personal stance.
