• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

About destroying dimensions?

Status
Not open for further replies.
1,007
15
I usually think of dimensions as all of the physical matter in space 3D.

Are dimensions more than just all of the physical matter in space 3D and including the space-time continuum or am I mistaken?

Thanks for reading.
 
I personally don't know if it is possible to destroy a direction, such as up, right, or sideways, rather than simply a certain continuum with those attributes, although it is fiction, so anything is possible.
 
It's certainly not possible IRL, but just as destroying a concept is possible, I guess fiction would be able to.
 
Maybe a character could use Concept Manipulation to erase the concept of "up and down" from existence, therefore, destroying the 3th dimension? Maybe it could work. I wonder what tier this would be.
 
A dimension is an axis of movement. All of 3D space is all matter within the spatial dimensions length, width, and heighth.
 
King Boo is 3-A for creating paranormal portals which I think means destroying a dimension including the space-time continuum in Luigi's Mansion Dark Moon while game Solaris is 2-C to 2-B for consuming all existing timelines and eating dimensions for lunch. King Boo should be upgraded to low 2-C IMO
 
@Adam

Not the place for this. Also context 101.

Dimension in fiction 99% of the time just means "parallel reality with different size and rules from our own"
 
Actually, erasing the concept of any spatial dimension is something only a 1-A could logically do and be unaffected by it. If a 7-D being erased the concept of "width", they literally just downgraded themselves to 6-D because they lost a spatial dimension.

Destroying spatial dimensions is one of the most illogical, incoherent, and backwards abilities that could possibly exist, even for fiction.
 
Sera Loveheart said:
Actually, erasing the concept of any spatial dimension is something only a 1-A could logically do and be unaffected by it. If a 7-D being erased the concept of "width", they literally just downgraded themselves to 6-D because they lost a spatial dimension.
Destroying spatial dimensions is one of the most illogical, incoherent, and backwards abilities that could possibly exist, even for fiction.
Then destroying dimensions isn't possible in real life If I am not mistaken...
 
Adamjensen2030 said:
Then destroying dimensions isn't possible in real life If I am not mistaken...
Considering we don't even know if there's anything beyond "our" universe

and our universe only has four dimensions we can observe

and said dimensions are far more metaphysical sets of coordinates in a hypothetical graph than anything physical

and we kinda need all of those dimensions to exist on any level we currently view as meaningful,

Yeah it's not really a thing that can be done irl.
 
Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:
Considering we don't even know if there's anything beyond "our" universe

and our universe only has four dimensions we can observe

and said dimensions are far more metaphysical sets of coordinates in a hypothetical graph than anything physical

and we kinda need all of those dimensions to exist on any level we currently view as meaningful,

Yeah it's not really a thing that can be done irl.
Correct me if I am wrong but I think Space means all of the physical matter in the universe is 3D while time is 4D.

Thanks for the information.
 
Since the questions have been answered, perhaps I should close this thread?
 
Time is not necessarily 4-D per-say so much as it is actually the 4th dimension (in the good majority of theories. Some do not consider time to be the "4th" dimension in the same way the three spatial ones we know of are. This is also just irrelevant semantics.). But yes, you are correct in that our universe is considered to be composed of three spatial dimensions in which all matter resides, and a 4th dimension of time.

@Ant

I don't see why not.
 
Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:
Time is not necessarily 4-D per-say so much as it is actually the 4th dimension (in the good majority of theories. Some do not consider time to be the "4th" dimension in the same way the three spatial ones we know of are. This is also just irrelevant semantics.). But yes, you are correct in that our universe is considered to be composed of three spatial dimensions in which all matter resides, and a 4th dimension of time.
Thanks again for the reassurance.

I am grateful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top