Non-Combative Profiles

Reppuzan

VS Battles

Retired

11,444

1,997

• Oct 15, 2016

• #1

It came to my attention that some of the profiles on this wiki are from series don't even have any usable combat feats. From what I understand, there's no rule against them, but there isn't much point to a profile that doesn't have any usable feats of any kind, is there?

Where should we draw the line?

 

SomebodyData

El SiD

VS Battles

Joke Battles

Retired

14,154

2,513

• Oct 15, 2016

• #2

I don't understand why we have profiles like that.

It makes the entire tiering system inert (Am I using that word right?)

 

Reppuzan

VS Battles

Retired

11,444

1,997

• Oct 15, 2016

• Thread starter
• #3

I mean, they're rated properly, but they don't have any feats other than being, you know, people.

 

Grudgeman1706

VS Battles

Retired

1,670

145

• Oct 15, 2016

• #4

You make a point Reppuzan, however aren't we first a character statistic wiki first before we are a Versus debating(at least this is what I believe ant said iirc), so while their are some profiles that have no real use for combat or debating, we still have them and add more because we try to get the proper statistics for everything? I could be wrong though.

 

Reppuzan

VS Battles

Retired

11,444

1,997

• Oct 15, 2016

• Thread starter
• #5

I don't really care about versus debating for some of these profiles (especially for those like Soma's) but is there a point where we need to stop and think? I mean, I'd add the entire series, but none of them are above 10-B and none of them actually fight outside of making each other convulse over the deliciousness of each other's dishes.

Edit: What SomebodyData said below sums up my point nicely.

 

SomebodyData

El SiD

VS Battles

Joke Battles

Retired

14,154

2,513

• Oct 15, 2016

• #6

i was referring to the fact that having noncombative characters makes the wikia more of a fictional characters wikia than a battle stats one

 

Gemmysaur

VS Battles

Retired

6,849

1,499

• Oct 15, 2016

• #7

I'd rather we not have profiles like these. I mean, it doesn't make much sense to make character profiles that would not be in any way useable in a versus battle.

(Lol at a battle of the cooks: Soma vs Sanji vs Shirou)

I think we could have profiles of characters that have actually fought in a real battle, and not much else. But then again, composite animals. Ugh, this is a pain.

Maybe we can have a non-combat versus forum? Like Sora (NGNL) vs Lelouche in a chess match or something, but then again, that can be put in the Fun and Games or the General Discussion forum instead.

 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker

He/Him

VS Battles

Bureaucrat

Administrator

165,117

72,041

• Oct 15, 2016

• #8

Well, like Grudgeman mentioned, we are first and foremost a statistics indexing wiki in general, but I suppose that listing ordinary humans with no special abilities seems kind of pointless.

On the other hand, it isn't like they are causing any harm, as long as they come from popular notable works, so I personally do not mind.

 

AidenBrooks999

VS Battles

Retired

5,141

290

• Oct 15, 2016

• #9

I kind on Antvasima's side.

Profile with 10-B tiers and not special abilties power nor hax are practically useless (For this wiki)

Yes, it true, they don't make any harm, but we can even use them for battles. Yes, we can make a cooking battle for fun, but that's all. One think is if we use (for example) Sanji for a cooking battle against a weaker character, even if Sanji has higher stats. But other thing is to have a profile that is only there for fun and non-combat battle.

 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker

He/Him

VS Battles

Bureaucrat

Administrator

165,117

72,041

• Oct 15, 2016

• #10

Yes. Not everything has to be used for battles. We mainly just index statistics in general.