Downgrade Baam to High 7-A+ and New Name

Enryu_The_Red_Tower

4,491

2,341

• Jul 27, 2018

• #1

Calm, this is a downgrade only to Base Baam, so your Thorn Ignition For will be like 6-C, first, we put Baam as 6-C for getting a cut in Data Zahard, which Data Maschenny Redan failed to do that is a 6-C, but in the case, Zahard was not taking Baam seriously, he was testing him to see if he was still a strong opponent, and Zahard was on low guard because he was testing and so keen on Baam having the potential to be a worthy opponent for him that he was not worried about his defense and ended up lowering the guard, so he ended up receiving the cut and while with Maschenny he was on high guard and received no damage and even used the White Lecalicus against her to praise- but Baam did not make Zahard use the White Lecalicus and only did so after getting his new form.

And I also propose a new name for Baam form, and the name will be Enryu's Thorn Ignition, we have to shorten the name that way because it's too big to be pronounced.

So I propose the new AP for Baam (Post-Revolution Training):

AP: High 7-A+ (Stronger than Data Maschenny Base), higher with Thorn Boost (Made a small cut in Data Zahard, although he was off guard), At least 6-C with Enryu's Thorn Ignition (Vastly stronger than before, and it can seriously hurt Data Zahard, Fought on equal terms against serious Data Zahard, easily mached and tied with his Lecalicus Ignition forms)

Durability: High 7-A+, higher with Thorn Boost (Survived from some casual attacks from Data Zahard), At least 6-C (Took hits from serious Data Zahard and resisted the shock of the more powerful techniques of both)

 

Litentric_Teon

6,247

670

• Jul 28, 2018

• #2

I think this is fair. I was also rereading the fight yesterday, and I agree.

 

Enryu_The_Red_Tower

4,491

2,341

• Jul 28, 2018

• Thread starter
• #3

So can I add these changes now?

 

Litentric_Teon

6,247

670

• Jul 28, 2018

• #4

Sure, if you haven't already.

 

Enryu_The_Red_Tower

4,491

2,341

• Jul 28, 2018

• Thread starter
• #5

Alright (the rematch between Baam and Meliodas is about to appear)

 

Enryu_The_Red_Tower

4,491

2,341

• Jul 28, 2018

• Thread starter
• #6

Can you also change the name of the "Horned Form" to "Enryu's Thorn Ignition"?

 

Litentric_Teon

6,247

670

• Jul 28, 2018

• #7

Sure.

 

Malikobama1

808

131

• Jul 28, 2018

• #8

I was browsing CRTs and I saw your comment about Meliodas and Baam going to have a match so I looked at Baam's profile and I'm a little confused. Going by the wording on Koon Maschenny Zahard's profile her Redan form is stronger than her base form "a couple times over." That was used to make her base form High 7-A but it should be 6-C. "A couple times over" means "twice over" or "two times over," like if you were to say "a few times over" it would mean at least three times over.

Her base form, going by the low-end calc for her Redan form, is 4.34483 gigatons, which is baseline 6-C. Baam would also be 6-C.

 

Litentric_Teon

6,247

670

• Jul 28, 2018

• #9

Is that how that works? We were working under the assumption that several means, "at least 3x" hence the divide by three to place them into High 7-A.

 

Malikobama1

808

131

• Jul 28, 2018

• #10

If it's "several" that's a different story, I'm just going off her her profile which says "a couple times over." Several = 3 at minimum, but a couple times over means twice as much.

 

Litentric_Teon

6,247

670

• Jul 28, 2018

• #11

Yeah, in verse she says her power is multiplied several times over.

 

Malikobama1

808

131

• Jul 28, 2018

• #12

Okay yeah that would be three times over, and the justification on her profile should probably be clarified.

 

Enryu_The_Red_Tower

4,491

2,341

• Jul 28, 2018

• Thread starter
• #13

So should I change "the couple of times" to "several times" in the description of Redan's strength increase?

 

Malikobama1

808

131

• Jul 28, 2018

• #14

I would just change it to the specific wording used in the story. "Several times," "several times over," whatever the wording is.

 

Litentric_Teon

6,247

670

• Jul 28, 2018

• #15

Thank you.

 

Enryu_The_Red_Tower

4,491

2,341

• Jul 28, 2018

• Thread starter
• #16

Here is the rematch between Baam and Meliodas:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1915801

 

RinkakuKagune

1,184

140

• Jul 30, 2018

• #17

I fully disagree with this. Base Baam was able to deal more damage to Data Zahard than Data Maschenny so he would be 6-C. You said Zahard wasn't taking Baam seriously, but he wasn't with Maschenny either. So even if Zahard let his guard down the fact that he was able to deal more damage to Zahard than Maschenny simply proves that he's more powerful than her. Zahard only used the White Lecalicus our of respect for Maschenny - he wanted to sent her out with his most powerful attack. He held back then and didn't bother to dodger any of her attacks. Furthermore i evcen doubt that he was holding back. Zahard stating that he was trying to control himself but ended up getting too excited - which is a self declaration by himself that he isn't able to hold himself back well. He was able to match Zahard's Shinsoo blasts with his own - something Maschenny was never able to do, and Koon even commented on the fact that Baam was remarkable for fighting against Zahard in a Shinsoo battle. Koon - who has accompanied Zahard for years and should know his traits - stated that a fight with Zahard starts when he shows his teeth. And yet he didn't even smile when facing Maschenny. Baam was able to then block multiple strikes from Zahard after that, and then overpowered him just before his used his Thorn Ignition Mode.

 

Litentric_Teon

6,247

670

• Jul 30, 2018

• #18

Ah, you know what, that's true. Baam with the orb inside a black hole sphere was able to do all of that.

I'll support base Baam being 6-C for Rin's reasons then.