Binary Ms. Marvel downgrade.

Stefano4444

He/Him

6,253

5,411

• Mar 22, 2018

• #1

Something that Jobbo had point out nearly a month ago, she had never converted 81% of the black hole into energy.

It was stated instead that she was converting the energy from the black hole at 81% efficiency.

https://i.imgur.com/QCfsKgd.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/vRI2bKe.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/4xFW1mR.jpg

- Assessing: converting energy from proximate singularity at sixty-seven percent efficiency.

- Revising: seventy-two percent efficency.

- Assessing: eight-one percent efficiency.

She had only absorbing energy from the black hole, she hasn't absorbed most of the black hole.

 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker

He/Him

VS Battles

Head Bureaucrat

Bureaucrat

Administrator

168,565

77,374

• Mar 22, 2018

• #2

Hmm. Then we might have to remove that feat, and scale her to Thor and Gladiator instead.

 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker

He/Him

VS Battles

Head Bureaucrat

Bureaucrat

Administrator

168,565

77,374

• Mar 22, 2018

• #3

It is best if you ask Matthew to comment here though.

 

RinkakuKagune

1,184

140

• Mar 31, 2018

• #4

Antvasima said:

Hmm. Then we might have to remove that feat, and scale her to Thor and Gladiator instead.

Click to expand...

Binary was one-shot by Gladiator though, so he's clearly stronger. If the feat is rejected then that would mean that shes not 4-B. But anyway I disagree with this. The computers literally say that she is converting energy NOT ABSORBING. It was a Mass-Energy feat not a simple energy absorption feat or else the computers would have said that she was absorbing. Conversion means to change not just take in like absorption is.

 

Stefano4444

He/Him

6,253

5,411

• Mar 31, 2018

• Thread starter
• #5

RinkakuKagune

The robots clearly say that Ms. Marvel was just absorbing energy from the black hole. Nothing in the three statements imply he had converted the black hole itself intro energy.

She was only absorbing energy from black hole (most likely hawking radiation). And even that, she wasn't capable to actually utilize all the energy, but only at 81% efficency.

 

RinkakuKagune

1,184

140

• Mar 31, 2018

• #6

>Nothing in the statements imply that she had converted the black hole into energy

Apart from the fact that they literally say the singularity is undergoing a conversion? Nowhere does it speak of absorption at ALL. It never once said absorb it said conversion. You literally have the statement that says she is converting energy in the statement.

Assessing: converting energy from proximate singularity at sixty-seven percent efficiency.

And you realise this is taken from your own original post right? You have literally contradicted yourself.

 

RinkakuKagune

1,184

140

• Mar 31, 2018

• #7

Even 1% would be Solar System level btw.

 

ByAsura

He/Him

VS Battles

Administrator

22,461

18,689

• Mar 31, 2018

• #8

If what the OP suggests is accepted, she tapped into/absorbed a white hole to get her Binary powers the first time around. Could be Solar System level and a supporting feat.

 

Stefano4444

He/Him

6,253

5,411

• Mar 31, 2018

• Thread starter
• #9

RinkakuKagune

You should re-analyse the quote.

Assessing: converting energy from proximate singularity at sixty-seven percent efficiency.

The statement is pretty clear, Ms. Marvel was only converting unknown amount of energy from the singularity in proximity, a feat nowhere near Solar System level or even calculable, since when we don't know how much energy she was absorbing.

And even if what you say was correct, the robot never say that Ms. Marvel had absorbed more than half the mass of the black hole, the percents aren't about how much mass she had already turn in energy, but about how much efficiency she was convert the energy she was absorbing.

 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker

He/Him

VS Battles

Head Bureaucrat

Bureaucrat

Administrator

168,565

77,374

• Mar 31, 2018

• #10

I think that Stefano seems to make better sense so far.