Would this be "At least 1-C" or above baseline?

[Furudo_Erika]

There are an infinite amount of 1-C layers.
Now normally, 1-C x ∞ 1-C layers is still baseline 1-C (or at least from what I read, it is).

But what if a verse treats it differently? Where they make a very clear distinction that affecting more than one layer is considerably higher than affecting just one (more than infinitely so in fact).

Where one who can only affect one layer is next to powerless in comparison to one who can affect two or more?
Would that be above "baseline" 1-C? If the former 1-C weaker in comparison to the latter by a more than infinite difference?

And how would this relate to threads?
As if the two fought in a thread, the latter would win due to sheer power difference that is explicitly established, but what if the latter was faced with someone else in a difference verse that barely reached 1-C?
Would the latter still have an AP advantage as they are clearly stronger (and explicitly described as being so) than the former who just reached 1-C from their verse?

Or would they still be considered "equal" despite the explicit power difference described above?

 

[Furudo_Erika]

Elaboration on the "more than infinite" power difference:
Each layer is infinite in size in all directions, so having infinite power is not enough to breach through to another layer; you would only affect the entire layer you are on, regardless of multipliers.

To "breach" through to another layer, you must quite literally breach beyond an infinite gap of power; a power difference greater than infinity.

Travel is impossible from layer to layer impossible without breaching beyond an infinite speed as well.
This means you have to exceed a speed faster than crossing infinite distance in 0 time, as that is still infinite speed.
(Or in the context of what would be "Inaccessible speed", it would have to be faster than it since crossing infinite distance in 0 time is not enough)

But what would that even be?

 

[Furudo_Erika]

bump