• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Type 5 Acausality Question

TheUnshakableOne

She/Her
VS Battles
Retired
Messages
6,743
Reaction score
1,844
If a character exist before the creation of all and any and concepts of "time" and "duration" was created, and the creation of the concepts of time did not bind him, or affect him in any way, and he is not interactable at all without any kind of special power up or boost.

Is this enough grounds for Type 5 Acausality?
 
Perhaps, I'd give a likely for this exact example. But as with all things on this Wiki context is key and what is actually shown by the feats might have slight but significant changes that makes it a no despite how similar they are to this hypothetical.

Basically it's good evidence but it's still case by case.
 
Perhaps, I'd give a likely for this exact example. But as with all things on this Wiki context is key and what is actually shown by the feats might have slight but significant changes that makes it a no despite how similar they are to this hypothetical.

Basically it's good evidence but it's still case by case.
Thank you!

Before posting think I was thinking of a "possibly"
 
I mean depending on the actual evidence given don't be surprised if a CRT created based off this information gets a flat no from me with not even a Possibly.
 
I mean depending on the actual evidence given don't be surprised if a CRT created based off this information gets a flat no from me with not even a Possibly.
is Fate considered to be one and and the same as Causality? like as in Fate IS Causality?
 
Back
Top