• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tom Lee calc and Ji chang calc

Well

The Tom Lee calc isn’t pulverisation it’s fragmentation, the pixel scaling is also wrong, why have you pixel scaled so much , the actual crater is super small, and the dodging calc I don’t even need to explain, we have no proof of where Tom Lee’s finger was

The Jichang calc was wrong and debunked to 7 mega joules but I will explain it to you

it’s not vaporisation
The mass of the sage is wrong
The volume is wrong he didn’t destroy the full safe
 
Ok, well I guess no one against my calc so Ok, By the way can you help me calc?
And also Tom Lee and Ji chang are scaled to Small Building and Hypersonic Speed so okay
And second of all it was violent fragmentation that Tom Lee caused, the wall actually have fragments to spill out. and if you tell me that my pixel scaling is wrong then, Actually. The pixel measurements are inaccurate. We aren't in that scenario, So what we can do is to guess the length. I mean you can't just jump into conclusion by just seeing it. So I still stand with my calc no matter what.
So, what is Violent Fragmentation? Violent fragmentation applied when the matter that was destroyed was turned into small but still distinguishable pieces, and also the wall that was destroyed can met with these conditions
 
Last edited:
Ok, well I guess no one against my calc so Ok, By the way can you help me calc?
And also Tom Lee and Ji chang are scaled to Small Building and Hypersonic Speed so okay
And second of all it was violent fragmentation that Tom Lee caused, the wall actually have fragments to spill out. and if you tell me that my pixel scaling is wrong then, Actually. The pixel measurements are inaccurate. We aren't in that scenario, So what we can do is to guess the length. I mean you can't just jump into conclusion by just seeing it. So I still stand with my calc no matter what.
So, what is Violent Fragmentation? Violent fragmentation applied when the matter that was destroyed was turned into small but still distinguishable pieces, and also the wall that was destroyed can met with these conditions
Tom Lee and Jichang being scaled to it doesn't change anything

Thats not violent fragmentation, I don't know what to tell you, the pixel scaling is still wrong, also you have to have the depth of the crater, use 0.8...

The speed calc is calc stacking, also you don't have any proof that he was only 1 cm away from him ? Can you link the full feat at least so I can analyse it better
 
I put the tom lee calc there, and that is violent fragmentation I can see the small pieces flying over there plus the pixel. Plus the speed calc is not calc stacking. I use peak human speed so its not even @RemainsAE use that speed either the full feat I already shown you into that calc. If you want to learn more ask RemainsAE, he's the lookism expert, I already told you that it is violent fragmentation as the small pieces flying over them, but atleast the KE part doesn't have any problems with vaporization feat too

Since no one against my calc it could be accepted
so to set it with 0.8 you mean this?
and what should I do with 0.8 to convert cm?


and the reason why the measurements are alot cause it depends on the image size the image size is 541 px width: 696 px. and Second of all the image I want to show you is this can you help me analyze it? Thanks for your assistant
 
Last edited:
I put the tom lee calc there, and that is violent fragmentation I can see the small pieces flying over there plus the pixel. Plus the speed calc is not calc stacking. I use peak human speed so its not even @RemainsAE use that speed either the full feat I already shown you into that calc. If you want to learn more ask RemainsAE, he's the lookism expert, I already told you that it is violent fragmentation as the small pieces flying over them, but atleast the KE part doesn't have any problems with vaporization feat too

Since no one against my calc it could be accepted
so to set it with 0.8 you mean this?
and what should I do with 0.8 to convert cm?


and the reason why the measurements are alot cause it depends on the image size the image size is 541 px width: 696 px. and Second of all the image I want to show you is this can you help me analyze it? Thanks for your assistant

It is not violent fragmentation, the fragments are quite large, do you know what V-Frag looks like ?

it is calc stacking, 69.4 m/s for attack speed is calc stacking, use 20 m/s

well I wouldn’t mind 1-2 cm but I’m not a CGM

I cannot help you to analyse it without you giving me the chapter
 
keep scrolling to next chapter and can i use 34.3 speed since they're having FTE movement
 
and since remainsAE use 69.444m/s and still got accepted I guess I stay his instructions then. Since there's no evidence that using peak human with 69.444m/s is calc stacking, And I don't think that is
If you want to learn more

Calc​

Image221421
Image214421424
Average Head Height for 176cm male 900px | 22cm

Panel Height 1407px

(22 * 1407)/[190 * 2 * tan (70deg / 2)])

= 1.16333930002m

Average head height 1120px | 22cm

Distance to face 90px | 0.88392857142cm (Just round up to 1cm)

Lowballed speed from Jay: (1.16333930002) x (69.44) / (0.0176)

S = 4589.90232917 m/s (Hypersonic+)
that his calc btw
 
and since remainsAE use 69.444m/s and still got accepted I guess I stay his instructions then. Since there's no evidence that using peak human with 69.444m/s is calc stacking, And I don't think that is
If you want to learn more

Calc​

Image221421
Image214421424
Average Head Height for 176cm male 900px | 22cm

Panel Height 1407px

(22 * 1407)/[190 * 2 * tan (70deg / 2)])

= 1.16333930002m

Average head height 1120px | 22cm

Distance to face 90px | 0.88392857142cm (Just round up to 1cm)

Lowballed speed from Jay: (1.16333930002) x (69.44) / (0.0176)

S = 4589.90232917 m/s (Hypersonic+)
that his calc btw
Calc stacking
 
So to find the length
(38*467)/(145* 2* tan (70/2)])
129.149857131
I found the actual distance already

distance from the hand and head is 1.508125cm
to find the reactions speed I need to use the distance to divide by 20m/s that you mentions
so
129.149857131 x 20/0.07540625

its 34254.4171421 m/s Massively Hypersonic
 
Last edited:
So to find the length
(38*467)/(145* 2* tan (70/2)])
129.149857131
I found the actual distance already

distance from the hand and head is 1.508125cm
to find the reactions speed I need to use the distance to divide by 20m/s that you mentions
so
129.149857131 x 20/0.07540625

its 34254.4171421 m/s Massively Hypersonic
If you are being serious I give up on this thread
 
Back
Top