• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tiering System Section Question

Sniper670

He/Him
Messages
6,409
Reaction score
1,367
Here's how to Reach Tier 1A without an infinite layered cosmology
A: A good way to accomplish this would be to show that whatever state of being in which they exist is completely independent of the number of layers/dimensions present on the setting. For example, if they are unaffected by dimensions being arbitrarily added or removed from physical space by virtue of transcending it entirely, or if they exist as a "background" or canvas of sorts in which any amount of them can be inserted. This argument generalizes to tiers higher than 1-A as well.


My question is, why is it that just because you're independent of and qualitatively superior to how many dimensions can be added or removed from your verse's space, in some cases very few(a verse that has shown only 4 or 5 dimensions), that means you're independent of and superior to an infinite, when that hasn't even been shown in your series. It sounds a bit too....... Nlf

I wanted to know the underlying reason for that.
 
I myself think the reasoning is shaky, but the idea behind it can be associated with a couple of objects. Let's say; an n-dimensional plane, while the particular amount of dimensions are disposed to their own set of real numbers on a line, this wouldn't change that an n-dimensional plane itself is the framework of all possible series and values of such. As we know an n-dimensional space would be bijective towards aleph 1 as it'd be the set of all geometric dimensions of the continuum, meaning that if your nature stands above this structure would grant superiority in a manner that allows you to be above any quantity of dimensions.

A more functionalistic example could be explained through the analogous remark of a canvas. Let's say your intended verse holds several higher dimensions, parallel universes blah blah, though transcending this would usually only be above the order of layers shown, if your world is shown to be contained within a canvas or painting, it would allow you to openly show that it could...let's say make any complexity on the reality and yet none of it is able to affect you or reach your existential plane. Meaning you are ascribed as an entity (or realm) that is above the intricacy of that lower reality which holds its own systematic foundation to which is unable to measure you.

The indication of this in a practical situation, is highly unlikely and ever rarely used, which is why it's not a very prevalent note from what I've seen, because like most things in scaling, context matters and we wouldn't [obviously] apply this to an abrupt idea.
 
It's starting to make sense. To put my own spin on it........

Let's say there's an Unconscious Mind,or Brahman if you will, who's Mind is the background/Canvas of reality, of which any number of dimensions being introduced doesn't reach it, with evidence it's beyond the framework of those inside it, that would qualify?

What characters on here reached that tier with this btw
 
Back
Top