Questions about Boundless

[Ryu-Strongest-Fighter-in-Universe]

If a character has all of tier 0's qualifications and is portrayed as an unsurpassable being and true omnipotent too, while isn't the strongest in verse, would be still tier 0?
I mean a character is considered stronger than him

What about if this character has a rival who is near/equal to his power, would be still tier 0?

What is the best statement for a character to reach tier 0?

 

[Rikimarox2]

If a character has all of tier 0's qualifications and is portrayed as an unsurpassable being and true omnipotent too, while isn't the strongest in verse, would be still tier 0?
I mean a character is considered stronger than him

No, that's an anti-feat, and they would not be tier 0.

What about if this character has a rival who is near/equal to his power, would be still tier 0?

No clue on this.

 

[Napoleondevious]

If a character has all of tier 0's qualifications and is portrayed as an unsurpassable being and true omnipotent too, while isn't the strongest in verse, would be still tier 0?
I mean a character is considered stronger than him

he isnt boundless anymore then, could maybe be high outer+ idk

What about if this character has a rival who is near/equal to his power, would be still tier 0?

also an anti feat

What is the best statement for a character to reach tier 0?

i would say a character that "transcends differentiations" (it needs to be specified which domain are we talking about, differentiation of dimensions would for exemple be outerversal) or directly being reffered to as the conceptual absolute infinite (cantorian absolute infinite), or being pure act

 

[Ryu-Strongest-Fighter-in-Universe]

i would say a character that "transcends differentiations" (it needs to be specified which domain are we talking about, differentiation of dimensions would for exemple be outerversal) or directly being reffered to as the conceptual absolute infinite (cantorian absolute infinite), or being pure act

Can you gimme more explanation?

 

[Napoleondevious]

Can you gimme more explanation?

for the undifferentiated nature of boundless, AFAIK, it basically mean that in a tier 0 POV, wether you are High 1-A+, human level, or 11-C, youre still equally inferior to him (so inferior that you cant quantify it with qualities)

for conceptual absolute infinity its basically a three in one statement 'all encompassing', 'undifferentiated' and aseity from having no genus and so no other like it
"I have never proceeded from any Genus supremum of the actual infinite. Quite the contrary, I have rigorously proved that there is absolutely no Genus supremum of the actual infinite. What surpasses all that is finite and transfinite is no Genus; it is the single, completely individual unity in which everything is included, which includes the Absolute, incomprehensible to the human understanding. This is the Actus Purissimus, which by many is called God." - Georg Cantor

for pure act, i know its a very strong argument but i cant explain it as for now, i think it involves the character being the first cause of all actualization (since actualization of potency require external or internal act, an infinite regression emerge where one act revoided of cause [another act] must exist)

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

If a character has all of tier 0's qualifications and is portrayed as an unsurpassable being and true omnipotent too, while isn't the strongest in verse, would be still tier 0?
I mean a character is considered stronger than him

No, because that means they are not truIy surpassabIe as someone is stiII stronger then them

What about if this character has a rival who is near/equal to his power, would be still tier 0?

You cannot have something that is Near equaI to a tier 0; notions Iike Near, AImost equaI etc denote a quantitative difference, something that cannot even be appIicabIe to a tier 0

What is the best statement for a character to reach tier 0?

I think this wouId serve as the best exampIe for what you have to Iook for in a character that you think is potentiality tier 0
However, generaIIy, it can be summed up to the foIIowing things:

1. The character in question is compIeteIy beyond causaIity of any manner, it cannot change or is unabIe to change in any form whatsoever
2. The character in question is compIeteIy undifferentiated, Iacking any distinctions or quaIities; something Iike Nirvana-after-death in the IiteraI most sense wouId be a good exampIe, and Moksha can aIso serve as an exampIe
3. The character is aII-encompassing, not some singIeton that is irreducible because of being too smaII, such as a 0-dimensionaI point; Rather, a tier 0 is irreducibIe due to how big it is, metaphoricaIIy speaking
4. There is nothing outside of the character;s encompassment or anything existing before it