Question about tiers

[Skytheblue]

So High 3-A, Low 2-C, 2-C, and 2-B are limited 4 dimensional power and 2-A is infinite 4 dimensional power. Did I get that right?

And High 2-A is 5 dimensional power right? Therefore High 2-A is infinitely greater than 2-A? Or am I wrong?

Also, why are there so many tiers for 4 dimensional power, but only one tier for 5 dimensional power?

Lastly, what tier would it be for a character who can destroy the entire space time of an infinite universe? Would that be 2-A?

 

[Celestial_Pegasus]

High 3-A=Infinite 3-D power/limited 4-D power.

Low 2-C=4-D

2-B=Being able to destroy 1001 universes

2-A=Infinite 4-D

High 2-A=5-D

Yes High 2-A is infinitely greater than 2-A

Why are there are so many tiers for 4-D power? Probably cause we are still dealing with universes at this stage, as in space-time, once it becomes 5-D and above, it's just a matter on what level on the dimensional scale you are 6-D or 7-D etc, it's not about how many universes you can destroy anymore, universes are 4-D constructs. That's how i rationalize it at least.

Destroying an infinite universe depends on whether space-time was destroyed as well, if it's just the physical matter of the universe and space-time isn't destroyed as well, then it's High 3-A, if space-time was destroyed it is Low 2-C.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

1. High 3-A is Infinite 3-Dimensional power but your right about Low 2-C, 2-C, 2-B and 2-A

2. Yes your correct

3. I don't know

4. That would only be Low 2-C, you must destroy Infinite universal size Space Time Continuums to be 2-A.

Edit: Ninja'd by Celestial Pegasus

 

[Skytheblue]

1. High 3-A is Infinite 3-Dimensional power but your right about Low 2-C, 2-C, 2-B and 2-A

Actually I think you are wrong about that. I just checked out the tiering page and it turns out that there are two different versions of High 3-A. High 3-A can be either infinite 3 dimensional power, or 4 dimensional power on a less than universal scale.

Also, if you were to destroy an infinite universe along with the space time, wouldn't that be infinite 4 dimensional power? Therefore 2-A?

 

[Celestial_Pegasus]

Destroying an infinite universe along with space-time is Low 2-C, not 2-A, to be 2-A you need to destroy an infinite number of space-time continuum's.

 

[Skytheblue]

But you said that 2-A is "infinite 4D power". And destroying an infinite universe on the 4D scale requires infinite 4D power, no?

 

[LordGriffin1000]

I am not wrong, you yourself just stated that High 3-A is Infinite 3-Dimensional to low 4-Dimensional. I only said it's Infinite 3-D to keep it simple.

No, we have had many and long discussions about destroying 1 infinte Space Time universe and it's not 2-A just Low 2-C unless its undergoing a revision which I have not heard of.

 

[Celestial_Pegasus]

LordGriffin is correct, we have already discussed this, and determined that destroying a single space-time continuum regardless of whether it's infinite or not, doesn't equate to 2-A, you need to destroy an infinite number of space-time continuum's.

As for what i said about 2-A being infinite 4-D power, you can take it as meaning infinite 4-D power in the sense that you can destroy an infinite number of space-time continuum's, not just destroying a single infinite space-time continuum, there is a difference between being able to destroy a single infinite universe, than destroying an infinite number of universes, basically.

 

[Skytheblue]

High 3-A is "Characters who have an infinite degree of 3-dimensional power. Alternately 4-dimensional power that is shown as completely qualitatively superior to 3-Dimensional beings, but is less than universal in scale. Or that allows them to create large parts of a universal continuum. Take note that 4-D power should logically always be superior to countably infinite 3-D power, so characters within this tier are not necessarily comparable."

Meaning that there are two completely different versions of High 3-A. One version is infinite 3D power, while the other version is limited 4D power. Limited 4D power is infinitely greater than infinite 3D power. Therefore there is a literal infinite difference between the two versions of High 3-A. So you can't just "keep it simple" by acting like High 3-A is only infinite 3D power, when there is another version that is literally infinitely greater. I said that High 3-A is limited 4D power in my original post but you said I was wrong, and that High 3-A is infinite 3D power. Which is also true, but I was never wrong in the first place because High 3-A can also qualify as limited 4D power. Therefore you were wrong about saying I was wrong because I was never wrong in the first place, as High 3-A can also count as limited 4D power, not just infinite 3D power. There's an infinite difference between infinite 3D power and limited 4D power.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

I couldn't remember the whole discription for High 3-A and I apologise for saying you where wrong.

 

[Skytheblue]

No need to apologize. I just wanted to clear things up a little.