Question about 1A antifeats

[eternal1234]

So if a outerversal character disperses their power so much that it reaches non 1A it'd be an antifeat

but what if a 1A candidate can only interact with a lower reality via whatever native to said lower reality like phenomena, ideas and concepts and like wise their ap will also be non 1A but their existance itself doesn't change in other words they aren't bound to those phenomena, concepts and ideas? Would that be an antifeat for 1A?

 

[Digital_Franz]

So if a outerversal character disperses their power so much that it reaches non 1A it'd be an antifeat

but what if a 1A candidate can only interact with a lower reality via whatever native to said lower reality like phenomena, ideas and concepts and like wise their ap will also be non 1A but their existance itself doesn't change in other words they aren't bound to those phenomena, concepts and ideas? Would that be an antifeat for 1A?

Their AP will not be non 1-A for this reason. If their existence is 1-A, then their AP is too. Well manipulating concepts and the whole lower reality is not an anti feat. Take for example characters with R>F. They see a lower reality as fiction and manipulate it as such.

 

[Wikisource]

but what if a 1A candidate can only interact with a lower reality via whatever native to said lower reality like phenomena, ideas and concepts and like wise their ap will also be non 1A but their existance itself doesn't change in other words they aren't bound to those phenomena, concepts and ideas? Would that be an antifeat for 1A?

No, that reason doesn't make that character get non 1-A. About the rest, it doesn't an antifeat for 1-A. Basically, a 1-A character can manipulate lower realities by many ways, just like authors can manipulate their stories.

 

[eternal1234]

Their AP will not be non 1-A for this reason. If their existence is 1-A, then their AP is too. Well manipulating concepts and the whole lower reality is not an anti feat. Take for example characters with R>F. They see a lower reality as fiction and manipulate it as such.

I meant their AP in the lower reality since anything native to that reality will not be 1A and their 1A self cannot interact with it

 

[eternal1234]

No, that reason doesn't make that character get non 1-A. About the rest, it doesn't an antifeat for 1-A. Basically, a 1-A character can manipulate lower realities by many ways, just like authors can manipulate their stories.

So such a character can have only low 1A level of AP in a lower reality since that's the highest anything native to that reality can go?

 

[Digital_Franz]

I meant their AP in the lower reality since anything native to that reality will not be 1A and their 1A self cannot interact with it

So such a character can have only low 1A level of AP in a lower reality since that's the highest anything native to that reality can go?

No, not at all, their AP is 1-A. These characters can interact with the lower reality but not "enter" it because they are qualitatively superior. So there is no Low 1-A. The interaction is not direct and does not change the fact that the character's AP is 1-A because anything below that would mean that the character is not qualitatively superior in the first place. Often to interact directly with lower realities these characters create avatars.

 

[Wikisource]

I think one way to show this is that we ourselves obviously don't interact with the characters in comics/movies. But we have many ways to manipulate them like through scripting, plotting but obviously it doesn't change the essence that we are more real than them and our AP doesn't change. Same with 1-A and lower levels. The rest I agree with Digital Franz.