• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Non-concordance in Justification

Assaltwaffle

VS Battles
Retired
Messages
8,438
Reaction score
3,294
To justify a character's tier we use justification. These justifications can be from scaling, a feat, and more. This said, I have noticed a not-uncommon occurrence in the wiki, that being feats that are not concordant with the tier being listed in the profile.

While some may call this supporting evidence, some of these justifications are VASTLY below the claimed tier that is supported by another feat listed before or after it. Why are these present? For example, Akatosh, chief of the Nine Divines of Skyrim, is listed as 2-A for several justifications in Attack Potency, yet his justification for Durability, first and foremost, is that he is infinite in size and mass, a High 3-A feat. Why is this listed alongside, and even before, him being the strongest of the Nine Divines? (P.S. Talos is listed as stronger than Akatosh on this wiki as well)

Molag Bal also suffers from this, with a 2-B feat being justification for 2-A status. Even worse for him is that he has NO other justification for his 2-A rank, forcing the reader to look deep into lore for the real reason.

While I listed Elder Scrolls characters for this, they are not even close to the only ones suffering from this. What do you guys think? Should these statements be left in? Removed?
 
Back
Top