-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Meh
- Thread starter Aevorism
- Start date
- Status
PrimeHydra64
He/Him- 820
- 1,125
Hmm, first there is no character on the wiki called Aevor so there is no content to revise and this should be in questions and answers if it is just tiering.
Then, you would need to add it to the wiki but from reading this and the profile on CSAP, it seems this character is very influenced by battle boarding terminology so I don't think it would be allowed.
Then, you would need to add it to the wiki but from reading this and the profile on CSAP, it seems this character is very influenced by battle boarding terminology so I don't think it would be allowed.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,080
- 29,834
I'm posting some observations.
Firstly, this verse does not seem to meet our notability standards. At time of writing, the verse has just over 10,000 views, and no cultural impact whatsoever. Searching up any element of its name brings up entirely unrelated things, and searching up the full, exact name, in full, brings up one (1) result related to it (the second chapter on the site linked above), and then endless unrelated results.
Secondly, the user has admitted, after some prodding, that this is their own written work.
Thirdly, even if the first two things weren't true, the verbiage of this is strongly influenced by powerscaling conventions, and we've rejected works for that in the past.
I'm closing this, at the user's request. Thanks.
Firstly, this verse does not seem to meet our notability standards. At time of writing, the verse has just over 10,000 views, and no cultural impact whatsoever. Searching up any element of its name brings up entirely unrelated things, and searching up the full, exact name, in full, brings up one (1) result related to it (the second chapter on the site linked above), and then endless unrelated results.
Secondly, the user has admitted, after some prodding, that this is their own written work.
Thirdly, even if the first two things weren't true, the verbiage of this is strongly influenced by powerscaling conventions, and we've rejected works for that in the past.
I'm closing this, at the user's request. Thanks.
- Status
