• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Low 2-C(Universal+) and 2-C(Low multiversal)

Messages
21
Reaction score
3
So to be low 2-C space has to be infinite or can it be finite? I mean, if you destroy/create/significantly affect Space (3D) + Time (1D) space has to be infinite Or by just destroying 4 dimensions(3 spatial + one temporal) you are already low 2-C? And destroying 2 space-times like this is 2-C right?
 
So to be low 2-C space has to be infinite or can it be finite?
It has to be at least universal in size.
I mean, if you destroy/create/significantly affect Space (3D) + Time (1D) space has to be infinite Or by just destroying 4 dimensions(3 spatial + one temporal) you are already low 2-C?
Again, as long as the space-time continuum encompass a space that is equal or greater than a universe, destroying it would be Low 2-C.
And destroying 2 space-times like this is 2-C right?
Yes.
 
So to be low 2-C space has to be infinite or can it be finite? I mean, if you destroy/create/significantly affect Space (3D) + Time (1D) space has to be infinite Or by just destroying 4 dimensions(3 spatial + one temporal) you are already low 2-C? And destroying 2 space-times like this is 2-C right?
Under the presence of a temporaI dimension, how finiteIy Iarge the size is does not matter as the resuIt wiII be the same after being muItipIied to a temporaI dimension/uncountabIe infinity
 
quote the page saying it so I can add it to my needs to be addressed Iist and yap on it Iater
You're not the first one nor the last one who will want to change that prerequisite. Point is, it's still the case for now.

Qualifications
In order for something to qualify as a proper space-time continuum in regard to some feat usually one of two following two criteria should be met:

  1. It is explicitly stated to be a "Space-time continuum" or something equivalent.
  2. It fulfills the standards for being a universe-sized realm (see the first section of this page) and all of its time is also involved in its feat. I.e. the structure involved in the feat is the timeline of an entire universe.
 
Under the presence of a temporaI dimension, how finiteIy Iarge the size is does not matter as the resuIt wiII be the same after being muItipIied to a temporaI dimension/uncountabIe infinity
quote the page saying it so I can add it to my needs to be addressed Iist and yap on it Iater
If it is not universe sized the character receives Space-Time Manipulation and cope.
 
You're not the first one nor the last one who will want to change that prerequisite. Point is, it's still the case for now.
you forgot the page sauce

1184379827353038889.webp
 
You're not the first one nor the last one who will want to change that prerequisite. Point is, it's still the case for now.
It did mentioned

Qualifications
In order for something to qualify as a proper space-time continuum in regard to some feat usually one of two following two criteria should be met:

  1. It is explicitly stated to be a "Space-time continuum" or something equivalent.
  2. It fulfills the standards for being a universe-sized realm (see the first section of this page) and all of its time is also involved in its feat. I.e. the structure involved in the feat is the timeline of an entire universe.
As long as a minimum of one of them is fulfilled, it should be fine.
 
you forgot the page sauce
As long as a minimum of one of them is fulfilled, it should be fine.
The first one implies the other. Otherwise, people wouldn't go out of their way to prove that a realm is universe-sized.
 
So it has to be minimal like the observable universe? or infinitely expanding universe? or both are low 2-C?
A regular universe is fine, infinite is also fine. Both would be Low 2-C.
 
Back
Top