• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

İs this mountain level?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Since the question has been answered, should I close this thread?
 
can't I use this calc?
I always thought AP calcs like this are inaccurate, if the character has destroyed a mountain, like, vaporaizing it, or slicing it on half, then it should be mountain level, becouse the energy output of the character was enough to destroy a 7-A structure.
Puting It at 7-B or any other tier is pure speculation. Becouse AP calcs are not even taking into account by the creators, and sometimes It creates contradictions or antifeats as where the character after few episodies, volumes or whatever, is stated to be the same level as his feat.
This is like puting someone who can crush a continent on tiny peaces at only 6-C.
 
Shall I get the mountain volume at the minimum? Because in the anime, after cutting the small mountain, it cuts another mountain but big one, I mean, the minimum volume did not seem healthy to me. (For example "4.181e11 m^3" should I take this?)
 
Last edited:
Shall I get the mountain volume at the minimum? Because in the anime, after cutting the small mountain, it cuts another mountain but big one, I mean, the minimum volume did not seem healthy to me. (For example "4.181e11 m^3" should I take this?)
I think it is okay to take 2 times the volume of the small mountain, because it looks 2 times the size, by measuring pixels, you can find the difference between them and make the larger one
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top