Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you mean by this part, possibly for what?I only see 2-A, although the Millenial Tree Cookie could possibly just possibly, I'm just saying "possibly."
since it does not demonstrate temporality and only perceives those infinite four-dimensional temporalities, although on closer examination, it most likely does not (most likely I see that there are not 1 hypertimeline).What do you mean by this part, possibly for what?
Not really. I can see 2-A from the scan where one of them says "there's an endless amount of tasks to record" given the context.
The events of the Time Manipulator branched out to all possibilities/timelines. That's one moment in time alone.Not really. I can see 2-A from the scan where one of them says "there's an endless amount of tasks to record" given the context.
Although, you might get something if you have more context on the "Ever-changing threads of time", that term means "constantly" changing, and possibly suggesting that the timelines branch at every instance of time [or in simple terms, "constantly"], however, a single scan is not going to cut it at all.
The scans for that said that timelines branched every time the time manipulator time travelled. However, that does not mean possibilities were branching at every instance of time, its more like those possibilities branched at the same time the moment the time manipulator time travelled.The events of the Time Manipulator branched out to all possibilities/timelines. That's one moment in time alone.
I don't think hypertimelines are possible here. What about the erased timeline embedded within the other timelines? Best statement for Tier 1 is Timekeeper Cookie saying "The future is changing at this moment." and "How convenient it would be if there was only one future"? and "Your future depends on your actions."The scans for that said that timelines branched every time the time manipulator time travelled. However, that does not mean possibilities were branching at every instance of time, its more like those possibilities branched at the same time the moment the time manipulator time travelled.
To get tier 1, you need something like "Timelines branch at every passing second" or "Every moment of time has its own possibilities which then branch into timelines" kind of context.
I did say that I didn't "really" see any Hypertimeline here. However, I assumed that you were going for tier 1 with these kinds of statements, that's why I elaborated on another way to get tier 1; that is, for cases where timelines branch at every instance of time of a Low 2-C space-time.I don't think hypertimelines are possible here.
This is really just branching timelines, not really indicating any sort of "Hyper" time. Although, regarding the "erased timelines embedded within other timelines", if you can prove that some character, via time travel, could go to an erased timeline, or go from a point where the timeline was branched or erased to a point where it wasn't branched or erased[as an entire space-time] yet, then that indeed warrants the existence of a hyper-timeline.What about the erased timeline embedded within the other timelines? Best statement for Tier 1 is Timekeeper Cookie saying "The future is changing at this moment." and "How convenient it would be if there was only one future"? and "Your future depends on your actions."
Characters usually call branching timelines futures, just a note. is this enough?
String Gummy went to Director Croissant Cookies timeline when it was erased. (Context: String Gummy Cookie was ordered by Director Croissant Cookie to go back to the past of the erased timeline. You can see scans of the Director in the scans I uploaded in this thread.)I did say that I didn't "really" see any Hypertimeline here. However, I assumed that you were going for tier 1 with these kinds of statements, that's why I elaborated on another way to get tier 1; that is, for cases where timelines branch at every instance of time of a Low 2-C space-time.
This is really just branching timelines, not really indicating any sort of "Hyper" time. Although, regarding the "erased timelines embedded within other timelines", if you can prove that some character, via time travel, could go to an erased timeline, or go from a point where the timeline was branched or erased to a point where it wasn't branched or erased[as an entire space-time] yet, then that indeed warrants the existence of a hyper-timeline.
A very simple example would be something I was planning for a future CRT; Space-time is destroyed, character travels to a point where it wasn't destroyed.
Would the justification I sent with String Gummy Cookie and the Director be enough for an hyper-timeline? (check the scans, updated them)I did say that I didn't "really" see any Hypertimeline here. However, I assumed that you were going for tier 1 with these kinds of statements, that's why I elaborated on another way to get tier 1; that is, for cases where timelines branch at every instance of time of a Low 2-C space-time.
This is really just branching timelines, not really indicating any sort of "Hyper" time. Although, regarding the "erased timelines embedded within other timelines", if you can prove that some character, via time travel, could go to an erased timeline, or go from a point where the timeline was branched or erased to a point where it wasn't branched or erased[as an entire space-time] yet, then that indeed warrants the existence of a hyper-timeline.
A very simple example would be something I was planning for a future CRT; Space-time is destroyed, character travels to a point where it wasn't destroyed.
None of those qualify for Low 1-C. In fact since its only branching because of personal action, you'd struggle to get more than 2-B.Scans are here.
No hypertimelines? Weird. He traveled to before the timeline was erased and could travel to the timeline when it was erased? Is that not enough?None of those qualify for Low 1-C. In fact since its only branching because of personal action, you'd struggle to get more than 2-B.
Not without seeing the full scene, no. Since time travelling before the timeline already creates a branch that you can always go back to which would spawn a new future.. He traveled to before the timeline was erased and could travel to the timeline when it was erased? Is that not enough?
The 2-A stuff for Cookie Run includes scans that weren't in your album that mention infinite numbers.Thats way off, Timelines in Cookie Run are already accepted as 2-A. The timelines cover every single outcome, every possible timeline, admidst the ever-changing threads of time.
No past means no future. The timeline disappeared and everyone within it. If you wish to see the full scene, it's here.Not without seeing the full scene, no. Since time travelling before the timeline already creates a branch that you can always go back to which would spawn a new future.
Yeah that's not a hypertime line example. They altered the past, destroyed the future, and then went back to before the divergent point.String Gummy Cookie and Croissant Cookie fixed the timeline, then String Gummy went back to the future. Croissant Cookie of the future tells him that since he fixed the future that timeline is gonna disappear as its past was changed, and then Croissant Cookie disappears.