• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

How Strong is This (Part 5)

12,273
11,254
How strong is 583,871,451,609,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 J?
 
Why such a specific question? Is there a feat someone or a story you're writing involving something like this? Or just curious.

Anyways this would be well into 3-A.
 
@Weekly What? High 3-A is for infinite 3rd dimensional power. The fact that this is a finite amount of joules, even if absurdly high, still makes it regular 3-A.

Also unrelated but I sent you a PM.
 
Indeed. It's like Amitabha levels of insane.
 
It's not quite High 3-A but it's certainly a very high 3-A
 
The capital H makes all the difference ovo
 
Ryukama said:
Why such a specific question? Is there a feat someone or a story you're writing involving something like this? Or just curious
Are there profiles for characters people on this site have created themselves?
 
That is so stupidly above baseline 3-A. It is so stupid that Google's calculator just straight up breaks.

Boy that ain't right. Why you lyin', Google? (Language)

Edit: Also it looks like the calculator breaks at a bit more than 10^300. Understandable considering that is already an unfathomable amount higher than the number of atoms in the universe.
 
I have some questions as well.

What if someone was stated to have the strength of a universe sized black hole?

What if someone did something like a Planet or Star level feat using literally 0% of their power?

ovo
 
I see the ovo, but I am coming in here anyway.

Universe sized black hole:

With a radius of 46.6 billion light years, or 4.66x10^10 light years, that black hole would have the mass of 2.969055x10^50 metric tons, as per this calculator. This would indicate that it has 1.493x10^23 solar masses. Knowing the Sun's GBE as 6.87x10^41 joules, we multiply the two and find that such a black hole would take 1.025x10^65 joules to break.

4-A, Multi-Solar System level+.

Well that just goes to show that such a method doesn't work on black holes of impossible scales, since that ain't right.

Literally 0%:

Well literally 0% would be zero. So infinite. High 3-A.
 
@Assalt Thank you very much. Appreciated the smart answers on the stupid questions lol

The former was a lot less impressive than I had thought.
 
This is approx 583,871,451,609,600,000,000,000 Centillion joules, which is 8.2119754094177215189873417721518987341772151898734177 * 10^233 times above the baseline for Universe level.

Had to rock Wolfram Alpha just to get a result that didn't glitch out

Edit: This is for the OP, not Ryu's question.
 
@Ryu

I mean we pretty much just broke the calculator. Obviously a universe sized black hole wouldn't be less durable than our galaxy, which is held together by Sagittarius A, a black hole with 4 billion solar masses.
 
Ryukama said:
Why such a specific question? Is there a feat someone or a story you're writing involving something like this? Or just curious.

Anyways this would be well into 3-A.
Yeah, it's for a webcomic I plan on making. Just did it here, again. Next time I'll take it to the FC/OC wiki.
 
You're more than free to ask the questions here. Just make the profiles at FC/OC.
 
Just saying, I would be careful about actually using this. This is just so stupid strong than I couldn't take it seriously. That is just my opinion though.
 
Well technically, it was the work High in bold that was supposed to be the difference, but the capital H also does I guess.
 
Yeah I agree with Assalt. When you add ridiculously high and ultra specific numbers to create OP feats it always comes off super Suggsy. Maybe some more flowery, vague phrasing like "the power of countless universes", "so high it'd take an eternity to count", "infinite worlds", "an uncountable number of", etc. Of course just my personal opinion you do whatever you think works best.
 
I guess it could work if woven into the narrative properly. Maybe like a computer calculating the joule output of an attack and it gets to that level? If done badly, then you get stuff like this wonderful, wonderful exert.

Afterwards, the two flew over to Eden's Garden.
Eden's Gardon was 100,000 billion light-years away from Heaven's Nest. It is an entire grass covered planet. It was only one tree and that tree resembles the Sephriot that stretches above the atmosphere. The planet itself is an infinite dimensional space. It only took Tenerezza and Waltz 0.7 picoseconds to get there through mere traveling speed.
 
Basically. If you want to have a super high number, just say "billions of universes/countless universes" or something. Sounds outrageous as is, but it is better than "My attacks have the energy of five point eight three nine times ten to the three hundred twenty-sixth power joules!"
 
@Dark If such a really high and specific number comes from a super advanced computer or some science nerd according to his calculations yeah that could work. I don't think the narrator or any normal character should be making statements like that though. Just seems too unnatural and will confuse/alienate regular readers. Like the example you gave.
 
Back
Top