This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
It is said that a character did not succeed in killing the other in a flash back, in spite of all his capacity (Hax) it wants to tell you that his opponent has a resistance to the hax of the first character?
The only problem here is was the flashback shown?. Just because someone possesses a lot of Hax and couldn't kill someone doesn't mean they have resistance to said persons Hax. Many things can be assumed, such as he was to fast to get hit by his Hax or he had one ability like time stop so he stopped time and moved before the Hax hit him or he could have resistance but it's all speculation unless shown.
Yep, In the context, neither the character (A) and the Character (B) can get killed in the Future So it would be better to put the resistance to the main hax of his opponent or so: Possible Resistance to blablabla ...