• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Deleted Jack Frost Page

So I was gonna create a profile for Jack Frost (The killer snowman) and noticed that it said I was recreating a page that was deleted. Was a profile for the Jack Frost from the two horror movies deleted? If so then why was it deleted? If i had to guess i would say because of the bathtub scene from the first movie.
 
It wouldn't be from a lude scene. We have characters who are very sexual here and they aren't a problem. If I had to guess the reason it is probably because the profile was low quality. Unjustified stats, no stats, etc.
 
Assaltwaffle said:
It wouldn't be from a lude scene. We have characters who are very sexual here and they aren't a problem. If I had to guess the reason it is probably because the profile was low quality. Unjustified stats, no stats, etc.
Jack frost did freeze an island in the second movie so that eliminates no stats.
 
If he has a feat that can probably be calced and used I don't know why he was deleted. Deletion history is viewable to admins, I believe, not Discusiion mods. I can only check existing pages' histories.
 
Still might be the bathtub scene though. He literally... Certain word the begins with R and ends with E's a girl to death.
 
Well, that is not good. That said just because the character is an evil piece of garbage doesn't mean he can't have a profile. We literally have versions of Hitler here.

That said if it was that explicit of such a deplorable act I am not sure if he should be used. Was the movie snuff-like or was that kind of scene a standalone? If the former he is absolutely not usable.
 
Assaltwaffle said:
Well, that is not good. That said just because the character is an evil piece of garbage doesn't mean he can't have a profile. We literally have versions of Hitler here.
That said if it was that explicit of such a deplorable act I am not sure if he should be used. Was the movie snuff-like or was that kind of scene a standalone? If the former he is absolutely not usable.
Jack does sort of molest a girl by becoming the ice that she puts in her bra in the second movie but he doesn't full on (i'm not gonna say the word) a girl again.
 
No. I've watched the movie before, he is just your tipical horror movie character. You can go ahead and create the profile.
 
Kepekley23 said:
No. I've watched the movie before, he is just your tipical horror movie character. You can go ahead and create the profile.
There is still the possibility that if it was him then he might have been deleted for some other reaso
 
Eh, idk if this is clear-cut. I mean we have Molag Bal, the literal king of r***, but what he does isn't a focal point of the media he is in, nor is it done on-screen.

I am not sure what to say about this.
 
What Jack does isn't his main thing, either. Really, he is just a horror movie character.
 
As long as it is a legitimate horror, not some weird fettish film, then I think that scene probably wouldn't prevent him from getting a profile.
 
Depends on the reason. What reason does he give? If it is anything but that scene we can remedy it.
 
Not to be an asshole at all, but the page didn't match our format, and some of the reasonings were off. Freezing an island is not automatically Island level, it is just possibly so, until a calculation is made. Also, him being snow doesn't make him "hard to harm". Someone with fire-based powers can legit melt him if they are powerful enough. I suggest using the Standard Format for Profiles page as a reference next time.
 
Kepekley23 said:
Not to be an asshole at all, but the page didn't match our format, and some of the reasonings were off. Freezing an island is not automatically Island level, it is just possibly so, until a calculation is made. Also, him being snow doesn't make him "hard to harm". Someone with fire-based powers can legit melt him if they are powerful enough. I suggest using the Standard Format for Profiles page as a reference next time.
Sorry. I guess i could have worded the durability better. ill recreate the page with the standard format


Edit: Nvm. Someone did put it in the standard format.
 
Can you please stop adding that he would be hard to hurt because he is snow? I can get a bat and destroy a snowman easier than I can wood or another material. If anything being made of snow is an anti-durability feat.
 
Assaltwaffle said:
Can you please stop adding that he would be hard to hurt because he is snow? I can get a bat and destroy a snowman easier than I can wood or another material. If anything being made of snow is an anti-durability feat.
Didn't he casually tank being stabbed and reform after an explosion?
 
Jack can likely regenerate from a small piece of himself considering he is made of snow.
 
Unknown seems far more reasonable if we do not know the size of the island, and it was not a strictly destructive feat to start with.
 
Back
Top