• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Conceptual Destruction

15,478
10,278
I have some questions about it, pls, answer all the questions pls

Question 1: if someone destroy the concept of water, does all living beings who has water in their body would die because they lack water?

Question 2: if someone destroy the concept of ''Cat'', everyone will forget that Cat existed? or people will still remember that Cat existed?
 
For question 1: it depends on the verse. What you suggested is one way it could be handled. It might also remove any and all association that people have with water, including the necessity of water to function. It could also make it so organisms never developed a dependency on water, but on something else instead.
For question 2: Theoretically it should work. People’s understanding of cats (the type 4 concept) should be a part of the greater concept of cats (type 3 or 2 concept). But not all fiction will treat it this way, sometimes stuff will disappear but memories won’t. If the memories do remain, sometimes people won’t be able to understand what the cats in them are.
 
For question 1: it depends on the verse. What you suggested is one way it could be handled. It might also remove any and all association that people have with water, including the necessity of water to function. It could also make it so organisms never developed a dependency on water, but on something else instead.
For question 2: Theoretically it should work. People’s understanding of cats (the type 4 concept) should be a part of the greater concept of cats (type 3 or 2 concept). But not all fiction will treat it this way, sometimes stuff will disappear but memories won’t. If the memories do remain, sometimes people won’t be able to understand what the cats in them are.
Thanks
 
Back
Top