• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

calestial towers rating

@Saikou You can message some calc gorup members about it if you wish.
 
Well my re-calc used Relativistic Mass, which may not be accurate considering that the verse likely has MFTL travel.
 
Well, it is not good to modify the method of an accepted calculation that is linked to within the profiles. You should preferably write a new blog post instead.
 
Yeah, admittedly that wasn't a smart move on my part. Though Radical is supposedly going to re-calc it anyway, so I'll leave it to him.
 
I need a link to a video of the feat, the timeframe and to know if all 4 towers did it together or not.
 
Perhaps you could copy the current calculation to another blog post, and revert the one linked to within the profiles to its accepted value?
 
Since LordXcano accepted the new calculation, the results can be applied.
 
Nah, Relativistic is only attack speed for the Celestial Towers. I tried to scale the Terrarian to it but it didn't work.
 
Just to make sure that I understand properly, Radical re-calculated the feat that you revised previously, correct? So all that is necessary is to update the pages that link to your old version?
 
Yes, but these are not different feats, so you do not need to revert your calculation to the previously accepted value, correct?
 
Okay. Then there does not seem to be a problem.
 
Back
Top