This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
That's what I have been saying for the game. The main criticism I can understand is how telegraphed all areas are, but to me it feels nice. Some more exploration would be good though.
I haven't found any good novels to read. The closest was 300 years in a wuxia world but i have stopped at the halfpoint. My favorite may have been library of heavens path. Anyone knows of stuff like that?
Daima is gonna be hype! Also makes sense for him to know his general condition wasn't the best. Sad for the artists burdening their bodies with the hope of making it big and even after.
I have no problem with that becoming the case. Multipliers are stated and don't need to make sense with our logic so ssj2 is a perfectly okay number. Even SSJ1 would have been a 10x, but Tori used 20x kaioken and messed up the scaling.
B real with me. It would be like 3x. Why do you make such crazy guesses when the biggest multi was 50x and that was because Tori messed up when he planned to go for 10x with ssj2 being 2x and 3 being 4x.
Yeah and for all intents and purposes the word infinite is never mentioned in canon so it doesn't exist. We use it for own tiering purposes, but that's only for us and thus isn't objective. The only objective multiplier is one inferred or stated in the work itself.
Exactly which would make it be derived from actual multipliers and so still make sense in verse as opposed to creating a multiplier just based on the wiki...