This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Though it wasn't my intended outcome, it appears the author for Journey through the Afterlife has chosen to delete the article in part due to the controversy surrounding it. From what I understand, they intend to rewrite the article at a later point to have higher-quality writing.
I feel that it's worth acknowledging what the (self-proclaimed, at least) author for Journey through the Afterlife had to say. Ever since I read the page I believed it was written with the intent of powerscaling, though I believe that it was centered more towards CSAP's tiering system than VSBW...
Yeah I genuinely don't care to argue it, if people are bothered by what I said that's more their problem than mine. I wasn't even arguing SCP should be deleted, just that the particular argument being made there wasn't particularly convincing.
That's a pretty bad argument, considering that the main distinction between 1-A transduality and tier 0 transduality is literally "things scale above this character", and SCP obviously has transdual characters. It also seems pretty common for SCPs to be tiered the way they are exclusively...
He was certainly justifiably pissed about everything, but he said himself that he didn't actually hate her. Getting closer to his heart helped him remember how much he cared about her, and he said that he knew the Bat and Mellori would be the key to bringing him to where he was at that point (in...
Thank you for the compliment.
I'm not fully against the idea, but I don't particularly enjoy the CRT process. The only CRTs I had planned were for after the tiering system revisions, partly to see about 1-A and partly to complete the Nothing's profile. If you feel that it's worth doing, you're...
The quote was about whether or not he was willing to risk his plan to destroy the Spiral by waiting long enough for them to catch up to him "just for the opportunity to rub their noses in it" per Mellori, to which he responds with the funny.
But it's kind of lost on context anyway since his...
Possibly, depending on things like how I'm feeling on a certain day, what abilities need to be elaborated on, etc. because I don't enjoy the CRT process.
The characters that need it the most right now are the Player, the Nothing, and Bartleby, at the moment.
I would really rather wait on committing to debating Wizard101 matches until after the tiering revisions, because I feel there is a very real chance that the characters (especially the god-tiers like Spider) can get to 1-A, based on talks with Ultima and a plethora of other scans. But for now...
I haven't really gone through the effort to completely confirm one way or the other, but judging from the responses I've gotten from threads on the topic, that seems to be the case, yes.
Arc 1 isn't really that different from Arc 2. You just wouldn't get that idea from current profiles, but we're at the point where wizards are implied to have concept manipulation for their school of magic just because they're wizards, and not because they're especially powerful wizards or...
The tiering system considers High Hyperversal to be equivalent to aleph-0 dimensions (countably infinite). Setting aside the vagueries involved with "transcending" and no further context, the successor to aleph-0 is aleph-1 (technically c but the wiki assumes GCH so yeah), which is the number of...
I assume you mean class of all sets because nobody likes Russel's Paradox.
The class of all sets is not "the biggest number". It's not a number at all... and there is no such thing as a "biggest number" in Set Theory.
It seems weirdly off-topic to be asking Ultima these questions in the first place, but yeah, 2/3 of those questions don't have any meaning to them. There is no division in Set Theory and log(empty set)x is just asking "To what power does the empty set need to be raised to get X" when the empty...
Not much to brag about, but it's ironic that you bring about the lack of change like it's a bad thing when VSB is literally in the process of reverting back closer to what it was in 2018.
What do you even mean by irrelevant here? More or less 1-As doesn't matter. If there are 12 characters that...
Unironically it feels like they probably saw
A.) Lag from an online match that looked awkward enough to be confused for teleporting
B.) The game over-compensating for an auto-target mechanic that looked awkward enough to be confused for teleporting.
The game has actual teleportation in it. Sly...
Statements like this make me wonder how much of the game they actually played before making these profiles. This is what Draw Attack does. What part of this even looks like teleportation?
It doesn't correlate to 1-A either, proof of that is in the assumption that you don't need explicit infinite-dimensional (or higher-dimensional) statements in order to have things that reach the tier. I can understand not wanting to take the position of assuming something is literally omnipotent...
Type IV Multiverses are pretty much the cosmological equivalent to the Class of all Sets, I guess, so without further elaboration it'd probably be Low 1-A.
It's not really the same, and it's technically not in the game, but he has an unused bit of dialogue where he says "The energies of this universe are mine to manipulate". Beyond that, there's not much. Most of his dialogue is him just hyping himself up either way.
You don't consider those things as part of the character's "raw power"? Is there some kind of site-specific definition of raw power that separates these things that I'm not aware of? I don't see how you could have 2-C environmental destruction without 2-C attack potency either way, unless it's...