This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
But that isn't them saying saitama is low complex multiversal, it's just a faulty speculation that he might be stronger than his current feats show so there's potential he could beat anos (which isn't even wrong if I'm being honest). I wouldn't call this wank since they are treating this claim...
Power creep wouldn't affect the series unless this power creep would apply to other characters. Like there's a 100% chance if saitama appears the enemy is gonna get negged, his tier wouldn't affect that at all lol.
I dont understand...you'd be bored because they're making a character more OP? I mean opm nowadays doesn't seem to focus on saitama that much but more so the other heroes. He's a flat character at this point so him getting a random universal feat wouldn't affect the narrative that much.
Yea but all those claims come from a normies perspective who has no rudimentary knowledge about fallacies or the tiering system hence why I said in the vs debating community.
The only place you'd see saitama stomping goku are in non research shows or guys who think the title of a show means the...
I was thinking the same thing @Phoenks
It would fit his character as well. Like I really couldn't imagine saitama using something like concept manipulation, it'd make more sense if he was resistant to that stuff while having a high AP
I think it's fairly accepted that he isn't passing tier 5 at this point or even tier 6 by people with atleast some rudimentary knowledge on tiering system lol.
We have stuff like rewind rumble constantly putting saitama in spite matches and in the G+ days putting him in stomp matches just to...
Saitama at this point is basically a punching bag in the vs debating community despite the fact that the entire point of his character is to be overpowered lol. But what would your reaction be if he actually does a universal feat later in the series?
Anyways I will say this however.
Monika's thought based EE sounds like more of an assumption since its based on manually going to the characters files themselves and deleting them. I haven't seen any explicit indication that it's actually thought based.
Not to mention the fact that this...
Having non existent physiology means u cant interact with something that doesn't exist. I agree with yukari winning for diff reasons cause the profile is missing alot of abilities which is why I cant bother to debate it here but just wanted to clarify
In agreement with inverted. Alongside the fact that he does make a good point about matt. Passing it off as "calling spade a spade" is just extremely rude and disrespectful in general, this isn't the first occasion he's done this as well. But irregardless, this'll be a pointless derail. I'll...
You're composed of organs and physical attributes, if you were to die right now, the concept of you will still exist via people remembering who you were. Removing someone's heart equates to taking everything from them.
We've already went over the hearts being made of lightness and darkness which are conceptual in nature as proven above, please read through the thread and if you have any qualms then, bring up relevant arguments. All of what you said have been refuted @TPI
Alright lets drop the whole "conceptual attack" topic for now. Speedster brought up an interesting point about keyblade wielders being able to destroy darkness. If darkness has already been accepted as conceptual wouldn't that count for the conceptual destruction ability?
I'm still indifferent towards the semantics of it, but this thread would drag on too much if I get into deeper detail about it, I'll accept the standards for NPI and conceptual manipulation for now.
Can we get a count for the individuals who agree with abstract existence though
I wont carry on with this discussion for long since abstract existence is going through. Even if I disagree with the answer I'd still like someone's perspective on it
I understand the standard for attacking souls =/= soul manipulation even though I'm sorta indifferent to it But what actually makes it a similar case to destroying conceptual beings?. If they are an abstract idea and they get destroyed or erased completely by someone why cant we assume that...
The issue is that "metaphorical reasoning" isn't an applicable debunk here. We understood what matt meant with those analogies, there just not good considering those two examples he gave have an actual context behind them to refute them actually referring to concepts, he didn't provide any for...
yes but how does it mean it relates to that context in this case when both it being a soul and body is out of the equation. Three people explained this to you