This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Discussions with Ultima have led to the conclusion that 1-A is better labeled as a "possibly" rating, for now, as further examination on the scans shows the relationship between the cosmic characters and 'the Wheel' is somewhat dubious, specifically with regards to whether they should be...
Yeah, I know about the Personal Daemon, I made a profile for it at CSAP. Hard to say whether or not it should scale to 1-A though, in my opinion, because they didn't really get any sort of portrayal as being innately separate from existence and "immortal" in the same sense that the god-tiers are...
I can see where I implied otherwise, but I didn't really mean to register for the tournament myself when I linked the Wizard. I should've been more specific, I was trying to remind people that they were an option. I don't think I have a lot of time and energy to dedicate to any sort of...
An object that exists in two out of three dimensions can still be coordinated in a 3-dimensional space, and I feel like that should just be obvious. It's also something the wiki acknowledges as possible.
👌
"From outside a mortal perspective, existence is considered an illusion and all things are but one thing" followed by character-specific explanations like (Raven, Spider, and Bartleby exist as immortals and are responsible for the creation of and continued sustainability of existence).
I genuinely don't even know what you're trying to say with this other than maybe "seeing something as illusory isn't R>F" which is blatantly false given the premise of 1-A, of Reality-Fiction Transcendence, and the word of the guy who literally wrote up the current definition of the tier and who...
Rattlebones and Ambrose need to be updated - the former only in his Shadowbones key and the latter only in the "Shadow Ambrose" key (why is it even called that, it should be Dream Ambrose). Both keys involve directly fighting against and stalling the Wizard in Arc 3. Shadowbones is given a...
That is not an antifeat - Ultima went out of his way to dispel that idea during his initial tier 1 threads. 1-A is about separation and ontological superiority. The player having limited influence over the game world does nothing to suggest they aren't 1-A, it just suggests that they have...
The collective unconscious stuff is excessively cringe and is not reflective of the real-life concept involved if you're arguing it has some kind of cosmological basis but the stuff about there being an infinite series of Dexters living in a higher reality is kind of funny. I wouldn't assume it...
Low 1-C would be replaced by 1-A, effectively.
Edit: Any of the currently-accepted Tier 2 stuff (like Malistaire, Young Morganthe and a few potential future profiles) would still be in Tier 2 range.
The Dreamer isn't necessarily a "greater" true self of Bartleby, but it's probably worth giving them a new key or profile. I don't agree with Dasein being on the same level, though. There isn't really anything that makes him come off as similar to the Dreamer aside from them both being described...
The primary selling point for it being the "impressive" kind of essence was in the fact that it's also referred to as the blueprint for physical substance, which seems to be inline with how "essence" is used in the more "metaphysical" definition of the word, to me - but your opinion is noted...
This isn't "composing" in a physical sense, though, as I and the scans have reiterated. This isn't a case of them being made up of atoms or something similar thus forming whatever structure is involved, it's the essence of physical substance altogether, it defines what it means for physical...
Low Outerversal, specifically (I'm sure you know that, but I wanted to reiterate because it's the lesser of the two tiers, and in my opinion the less important argument in the OP, as well). And the reason for it is what you just responded to. The reasoning is also posted in the TLDR; it's based...
If a character is acausal, there should be no cause and effect to work from, especially if you're going with the vague description of "transcends cause and effect". Any sort of action being taken is inherently contradictory because cause and effect are intrinsic to every action. It's almost like...
Even discarding that, the hax and the characters they scale to are still being revised, including some of what Eseseso interprets as Information Manipulation Type 2.
Generally speaking, the topics you mentioned (Death and hope, in this instance) are concepts on their own, so choosing to specify "the concept of Death" is a bit redundant unless it's choosing to separate the mental idea of death with the general process of death (things dying). Things can...
...it's on a Staff Only thread so I can't reply to it directly.
This isn't true. Assuming by infinity you mean aleph-0, the cardinality of aleph-0 * aleph-0 is still aleph-0. Assuming the Continuum Hypothesis is true and that aleph-1 = c or R or "the set of all Real numbers", then aleph-1 is...
It's not a matter of "Transduality can be 1-A", it literally is 1-A, as the transduality page already shows, and as such any mentionings of transduality should either be interpreted as 1-A or assumed to be equal to nonduality which is not unreasonable, as the page itself specifies that the only...
If you're discussing what's currently on the profile then transduality just straight up is 1-A, it directly invokes qualitative superiority. Also, no disrespect to DT, but I kinda don't care about what was said by him on it if it's not on the page for Nonduality. On that matter:
Meanwhile, the...
Right, except a good portion of other characters on the list already have AE Type 1, and Transduality is meaningless as it is, given the reasons that have already been highlighted on this thread. Either you're trying to assume "qualitative superiority" over concepts thus describing something...
"Time, time, time... see what's become of me..."
It was only a matter of time until Wizard101 hopped on the 1-A waiting train. I'd initially planned to wait for @Eseseso to finish his hax CRTs, but he's been met with some other stuff, so here we go.
This CRT will focus on what I believe are two...
The old difference still invoked qualitative superiority. The only difference is that qualitative superiority went from N+1 to 1-A. In the former case, this suggests that all N-Dimensional characters are transdual to N-1-Dimensional concepts, in which case they're either 6D or the concepts are...
Why is transduality being treated as different from nonduality on this thread? The nonduality page literally says that the only distinction involves qualitative superiority which is 1-A, so either the characters should be treated as 1-A or they should be treated as having nonduality type 2. To...
ATM the only distinction between transduality and nonduality on the page is the implementation of qualitative superiority. If there's qualitative superiority, they'd be 1-A, if not, then their "transduality" is effectively nonduality type 2, which wouldn't exactly put them above Wizard101's...