This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I'm fine with it myself. Not SUPER excited that it coule come down to that, but at LEAST it gives those who prefer the low 2-C scaling the option to use it, and could end this back and forth arguing.
We have Heimdallr's video and god bio.
He also has forseight, able to predict attacks, and can sense when harmful presences are nearing. His forseight, similar to a certain Marvel character named Taskmaster, has difficulties with only the most unpredictable or skilled of foes, explaining his...
I'd say likely low 2-C, not possibly. Though at this do I really need to stress the point of them FAR more than likely scaling to low 2-C than not? "At least high 4-C, likely Low 2-C" sounds like a fair compromise. And no. 7-A is gonna be freaking stupid, especially when the monsters eventually...
I just hope its soon cause I'm actually starting to get very frustrated with having to keep going on and on and on and about the same damn feats, lore, and scaling that I've given more of for said scaling than everyone who has been arguing against it....I just wanna get this over with at this...
Arthur greatly wounded him and Merlin has spells capable of halting and hindering the damned thing who slaughtered countless pantheons across many cycles of creation and made the blade capable of harming him through energy manipulation. Both clearly have abilities on that level. But nah....just...
What?...Arthur literally almsot KILLED Jormungandr with Excalibur! And Jormungandr is the thing that's murdered numerous gods across countless cycles with even pantheon heads like Odin and Ra not meaning much to him! And Merlin is literally the one who was capable of binding the damn thing and...
Ok, if Arthur with Excalibur is somehow ONLY 7-A that will be absolutely stupid, no offence to him given he was able to keep up with gods and carve a gaping wound into Jormungandr. And likely Achilles to, who in his god lore was basically implied to be capable of taking on gods if he fought...
At this point, I'd just be happy to have the option to still use my scaling even if its just as a "likely" or "possibly". I'm getting worn down on this topic and as much as I'd PREFER to see low 2-C given to all those who scale, this needs to be settled eventually.
I'd be fine with all the characters being labeled as "likely low 2-C". That at least gives those of us, like me, who STRONGLY view low 2-C as the more consistent scale the option to use them as such. At least that gives the consistent scaling from within the series' fights, story, and lore some...
As for a consensus, I've beaten my points, their logical backing from combat, lore, and scaling from them with basic logic to the point I'm frustrated. We've been at this for what, a MONTH now? On two threads? And we've gone NOWHERE. As much as I wanna see this verse get it's proper treatment...
But there have been NUMEROUS others who scale to Zeus, Odin, and other pantheon heads! And clearly he isn't THAT vastly stronger if events in the underworld are anything to go by. And omfg....even in her lore it's stated ahe wove the universe itself into existence. And if you wanna go with the...
Ummmm first off: There are SEVERAL low -C feats. chronos, Neith, and Olorun are all capable of shaping universes.
Also many charachters have been shown and stated to scale around Neith and Olorun. Power scaling shows that a lot of the gods are on a similar basic level of power. Need I make the...
I said the MAGAZINE. Not the comics. The comics made hy Dark Horse are canon. The "official magazine" isn't canon. Sorry for that confusion.
And I'm fine with that compromise as long as the low 2-C feats and scaling is given attention to rather than ignored. If they get a "at most low 2-C" bit...
As much?...I've seen LESS against it than for it. The gods literally all come from the same place, fuel themselves with the same source, and have repeatedly shown through combat, lore, and logical scaling that most if not all the gods can be placed in a similar tier. Yes, pantheon heads are...
My point, was saying that they are on a SIMILAR tier even if weaker. Which was why I was using FF7 as a COMPARISON make a point with how thisnwiki scales things. The gods do very in power, but have CONSISTENTLY shown to be in a similar tiering of power and arbitrarily AVOIDING that tier feels...
This isn't gameplay scaling though. And we have SO MANY verses of characters in the same tier, despite some in that tier outclassing the others to some varying degree. Or others where, say Cloud Strife, beats Zephiroth who launches a SUPER NOVA at Cloud, which can be survived, and this wiki...
And literally, ALL THE GODS, including the hindus, come from literally the SAME place, coalescing from the thoughts and desires of mortals into divine beings, but also draw power from and fuel their immortality with the worship of said mortals. Every pantheon is affected in this same way...
How is it NOT consistent when MANY gods have already been shown to be able to contend with the likes of Odin, Ra, Olorun, and Zeus to varying degrees with others scaling of those characters as well? Tier 4 would be arbitrarily downplaying the characters when much of the lore, story, and basic...
Let's just hope we can ACTUALLY get this thing done. You know my vote and my reasons for said vote. So I don't have much more to add other than characters I'd like to see get pages.
It came from a period before the smite storyline really took off and consistent scaling was shown. It also references the HIGHLY noncanon magazine short stories, and god lore. But SINCE then the magazine has fallen to the wayside, the storyline is going strong with consistent scaling, and the...
I'm in the camp I'm in cause its had the more CONSISTENT scaling and arguments for it. Low 2-C has had fsr more scaling FOR it than against it in the story, lore, and with basic scaling logic that I see it as the obvious choice.
I'm still in the 2-C camp. It has the most consistent scaling and arguments for it, at least for the ones that have directly active in the story, or scale through god lores, combat, or basic logic.
Skins should be focused on later until we decide which scaling we go with.
And while true...
Basically. Maybe trying to figure out any potential keys for other skins after the MAIN cast is sorted out once we decide on which tiering system to go with. Skins are sort of low priority tbh. Also MAYBE smite keys for the RWBY gang cause of the crossover.