• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Search results for query: *

  1. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Why do other more inconsiderate members get that drastically affected by how the sentence is structured, especially when it's worded ever so poorly? We usually list further readings at the end of the sentence anyways, basic site design 101, since it doesn't break the flow of the ideas presented :v
  2. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    The for further info part being up first makes sentence structure look wonk as shit imo
  3. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Actually word it without hiding behind vague terms so I can address you properly, Jason. I still think Ant's version is just superior.
  4. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    It's almost as if this CRT is dependent on gauging if trans people are offended by certain aspects of the proposal. Fam we can't even lock verse discussions to staff fully if it's relevant for non-staff supporters to input, see the DC thread. This is literally gatekeeping in favour of staff...
  5. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Fandom seems to prioritise using current chosen gender, as Viktor Hargreeves' page was edited to uninclude his season 1 or 2 gender identity being referenced.
  6. The_Impress

    New Staff Promotions

    Congrats y'all!
  7. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    I'll suggest a minor additon that That makes the intent abit more apparent I feel, so certain vague or grey area cases aren't penalized
  8. The_Impress

    Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

    But it's an improper report beyond staff issue tho, I don't see why I can't address aspects of it :V
  9. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    We aren't discussing personal standards, trust me I no longer have casual discussions with you anymore, so you should be operating by general standards given I am obligated to talk to you on the thread, so instead of doubling down you should respect my basic ass boundaries given it's easily...
  10. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    ...there is no version to be drafted by Jasonsith as said version is rejected yet Jasonsith is too stubborn to comprehend it was, and in fact Jason's other proposal is a really dumb way to list it.
  11. The_Impress

    Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

    @AKM sama No I think the report needs to be addressed because it is an improper report beyond just the HR issue.
  12. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Jason ngl I am shocked you aren't prefacing every sentence in your messages with "TRANS ALERT" like your last thread on the matter. We already discussed how to address it without offense, you're just immensely dissatisfied it isn't in the hyperspecific way you want it. At this point you've...
  13. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Silence should speak volumes here, so I'll drop it. It's irrelevant to the thread topic anyways, this was me addressing accusations that I was just "being aggressive" over "Damage and AKM's completely ideal behavior", I can demonstrate otherwise through various channels if I so wish why this is...
  14. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Or instead you do acknowledge there is insensitivity present, so much so that if I were to address on an official degree there will be consequences, thus my report has weight and so do my arguments which overpower yours. Like it's a very easy thing to demonstrate now that I think about it.
  15. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    If you genuinely do insist there is not a fraction of insensitivity in this debate despite me repeatedly saying it is, then me making the report should only serve to verify it, AKM. I'm perfectly civil, I am just demonstrating your assertions, since you're so confident on them you're nulling my...
  16. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Feeling abit better now. Yet you can't prove it because your retort genuinely is just "no im not" and "but you're totally doing it tho", your claimed "strawmanning" is me contextualizing your inane proposals in a light that happens to make you look unflattering, which, is completely on you...
  17. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    famous school topic of knowing what's inside bridget's pants. libs got to the education system too darn it.
  18. The_Impress

    Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

    The ******* humanity.
  19. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    You're nitpicking every other message, it's not even about offensiveness there you're actually just making strawmen and mountains out of molehills. Demonstrate me the exact ******* wording where I said it's about being accurate. You believing in a way that discounts my experiences as trivial...
  20. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Doesn't become apparent exactly. In. Specific. Necessary. Contexts. That. The. Vs. Debate. Wiki. Doesn't. Meet. The sheer fact every single trans person that did input on the thread went against AKM and especially Damage's proposal can show shit. Comprehend it is offensive, the 90...
  21. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    When I am discussing what is offensive to prominent parts of the trans community and you say otherwise you're giving your opinions on what trans community is offended about. If you're gonna null context for every other message of mine, Damage, you should try to address your colossal fuckups...
  22. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Unnecessary directions. Thank you for your judgement on what my community should instead feel like, outsider. This is getting really blunt as to what it's meant to be, so I'll suggest improve on what you're typing out.
  23. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    If you see a world where a person's dysphoria is worth invalidating because of the irrelevant field in a debate site is more important to contain irrelevant information, you need to get your eyes checked. This is basically admission, Damage.
  24. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Not to be the person but like, again, that's ignorance if they're being persistent in their beliefs yet still.
  25. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    It's still implied to be encouraged. It shouldn't be encouraged. No need to unnaturally attempt to address it on the file.
  26. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    ...mate it should just be case-by-case and discussed on the thread itself.
  27. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Damage attempting to now lecture me for my minor ass exasperations. Literally calls something I said dumb when I said beforehand it was a minor terminology error. But besides that if my method of speaking causes someone offense when I don't even levy insults at them then I think the debate...
  28. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    I don't think the actual message is hard to comprehend, if it is I can repeat it for you.
  29. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Are you aware of slippery slope fallacy, Elixir?
  30. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Wow Damage congrats on nitpicking my terminology and voiding my entire response's context. It's annoying to do that, to be blunt, especially when I'm arguing two different users at once right now with barely any support.
  31. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Gender specific powers barely get used in a Vs. Debate sphere, I'm active on the wiki forum, it's irrelevant, so no I disagree with unnaturally forcing trans characters to be outed somewhere on the file. If a user want to do that it's fine, but it isn't something to be ******* mandated lol
  32. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Just discuss it on the thread.
  33. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Having minor colored responses isn't hostilities, in that way alot of things I can paint as hostilities. I haven't insulted either of their capabilities, and have addressed their points, but if their logic is ridiculous then I cannot help if me pointing it out makes them look worse.
  34. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    A bajillion different things can be a factor in a match, my Alliance section addition could've been a factor in a match, a character's greatest fear can be a factor in a match, their relatives can be a factor im a match, their mental conditions can be factor in a match, their species can be a...
  35. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Yeah sure :V
  36. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Yet my method still has the least offense since it isn't requiring to list irrelevant information on a page someone has offense for. There isn't one, colored language isn't the basis to act like I'm being confrontational. Demonstrate, because I can find and even produce a variety of trans...
  37. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    I cannot strawman you when your actual retort to it, is "but I'm not tho" and genuinely you can't expand further. I'm not saying their is hatred or ill-will but you're genuinely being ignorant with this line of reasoning that just voids basic things like dysphoria and the gender/sex...
  38. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Like, FANDOM standards are for REGULAR WIKIS, we are NOT regular wikis, we specifically AIM TO LIST ONLY VERSUS DEBATE RELEVANT TOPICS, how the absolute hell is a character's biological sex relevant to HOW THEY FIGHT? Except chance reasons it's not. We don't have nationality categories, we...
  39. The_Impress

    A possible new rule for gender sections in our character profile pages

    Why are you attempting to override the few that have then, Damage? ...you cannot judge someone's offenses. Biological sex is not equatable to gender. You're enforcing otherwise, this is grounds to cause offense. Unnecessary context, may as well get a trivia section going. Then why does...
  40. The_Impress

    Avengers: Secret Wars preview (MCU Avengers vs Dr. Doom)

    Tier 1 absorption of the entire being too. I'll close this.
Back
Top