This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
For some reason I didn't got the notification. I just agreed with the draft that Planck gave. But I didn't agreed with his conclusion of the NEP being Type 2 as there's just one type of nonexistence here which is your regular type and that would be type 1 with the limited rating.
You don't seem to know anything about the new changes to ND and NEP, right now even if you have ND it can interacted by if someone has a higher dimensionality than you, this can be avoided if you are somehow ND to the dimensionality itself which is not the case with Arceus and NEP just nuking...
I do agree with everything here except Type 2 NEP.
What does the dao of destruction have to do with Ning being non-existent or anything related to physiology? There is no proof that the dao of destruction has any relation to non-existence and your argument that Ning is non-existent to his dao...
And why should I retract? Objectively inciting someone to kill themselves is worse than using slurs/insulting someone and even more so in these times where anyone can be offended by anything, as I said I don't know what garrixian said to him so I have no knowledge.
Huh? What does my position...
Yes.
Let it be clear that I never dismissed one for the other, I refer to the evidence presented and that is why I told him that if he wanted to report Garri then he may do so in HR and I even gave him the instructions, unfortunately I will not be able to see the evidence as that is a matter of...
I would say they count, but tbh screenshots of the messages would work better. Since a group of people can agree to give a testimony that is not the true one for the sake of screwing someone else. I am not saying that this is the case here but better safe than sorry. Try to get as much evidence...