This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
You posted an example of string dimensions, which aren't spatial dimensions, which are strings that angle themselves in infinite higher dimensional angels. That's not a qualifier for High 1-C since they're not large enough to qualify for that rating.
The Dark Dimension is just beyond humanities...
You didn't. You're quoted thing is about compacted string dimensions which do not qualify for higher tier ratings since they're finite small volumes.
I'm not confused about the tiering, Dormammu just doesn't qualify for High 1-C.
But you did. Like right before you said "Before the stones" meaning base Wanda.
I get you mean now, you were talking about just powers she'd get. In that case she'd get what she's shown to do, dunno if she'd qualify for the Watcher's physical traits like being Acasual 4 as an example. But she...
Basically everything you're saying is unsubstituted for reasons ByArrow already mentioned:
Being 11th Dimensional isn't a feat. You have prove those dimensions extend in a universal capacity, not that I see Dormammu as being 11 Dimensional in the first place.
That wouldn't make her Low 1-C. You'd need to show her changing Loki's tree under her own power or something along those lines to get Low 1-C.
I disagreed with them scaling a base Wanda to Low 1-C.
It does since Watcher is > Dormammu in power and the OP would still have to prove that Dormammu can effect an 11th Dimensional structure of significant size.
I'm not seeing that.
As I said before I'm against the upgrades proposed in this thread. So list me as disagree.
More or less everything ByArrow mentioned I agree with. The Watcher's statement directly contradicts those two and KEVIN has to much against it for the 1-A version of R>F.
Ultron without the stones isn't Low 1-C. He needed all six to be a threat to the Watcher and once he got them all back he was going to kill everyone with his full power. Additionally a beefed up Strange Supreme got decked by an Infinity Gauntlet and the Stones have always been the strongest...
It was but then it was suggested that KEVIN be upgraded to 1-A and Dormammu/everyone be moved to High 1-C and 1-B. Neither of which I find to qualify.
Yeah I'm good with that.
Creating the transinfinite number of multiverses is Low 1-C. Not a single timeline or multiverse in of itself.
For the thread I said she wouldn't get Low 1-C without the stones, since she required them per your opening for her plan and was depowered with just five of them. Meaning her power <...
It contradicts main-canon. Since the Watcher, who's only 5D, is infinitely more powerful than Dormammu. There's no High 1-C upgrade to be had.
You're wrong. This has been brought up and rejected for the exact reasons I've mentioned. K.E.V.I.N. doesn't meet the unrealness and lack of interaction...
That's an automatic disqualifier Dark. End of story. Its also not fiction from KEVIN, since he's manipulating data, which is how he fixes it in the end.
For the thread I watched the video and Wanda is easily overpowered and then depowered by five of the six stones. Meaning she doesn't scale to...
She-Hulk interacting with K.E.V.I.N. is an automatic disqualifier for R>F on its own. In addition the MCU is "data" to KEVIN, which also disqualifies him from R>F since data isn't an unreal in comparison, just smaller.
Its not
For the thread the most SW would be is Low 1-C if she scales to the...
Yeah neither argument makes any sense. Loki is already Low 1-C from the show so downgrading him to Tier 2 doesn't make sense and Wanda destroying the Darkhold is a EE feat rather than a AP feat as decided in other threads.
Considering she can be held off and damaged by other Tier 6 characters...
Just math isn't enough. I said that higher dimensional calculus involves coordinate dimensions to explain how rate change works. The issue being that just having 5th Dimensional Calculus isn't enough for Low 1-C, since that doesn't mean the fifth dimension is of notable size, just that it is...
Tier Low 1-C to High 1-B works like Tier 2 but not as defined. Same with how Tier Low 2-C has two ends, one with a universe and one with an infinite universe.
So a multiversal Low 1-C construct is superior to an infinite sized Low 1-C construct which is in turn superior to a finite universe...
Low 2-C has two different ends. A universe sized 4D area and a infinite 4D area. With 2-C and upwards being other infinite/universal sized spaces. The statement is only Low 2-C.
The point there is that machine used to make portals into the realm requires knowledge on 5th Dimensional Calculus, which would be finding the rate of continuous change while in a 5th Dimensional space (which in turn relies on a coordinate point method to work). The statement is fifth...
I mean, there really doesn't need to be any context for the math. In order for the sentence to make logical sense it has to deal with higher coordinate spaces, which is what that branch of math was created to mathematically define.
The only thing it doesn't tell you is if the realm is...
1-A requires a discussion and unrealness for R>F. Them being lower dimensional would automatically exclude it from 1-A, since they're a foundation for the higher dimension rather than a separate thing entirely.
You're missing the difference. GL has every dimension be a Brane membrane/bulk space. Which means that each of them are embedded in that larger space. A standard bulk space under M-theory is a 4th Dimensional construct with string dimensional of finite size that loops around them at higher...
No, TTGL is High 1-C because all 10 to 11 Dimensions are considered bulk spaces. Not just using standard M-Theory cosmology. If they operated under the standard model they would also only be 2-A or Low 1-C because only the 4th Dimension would be infinite and the others would be compressed...
You can exist within string dimensions since they're threaded in higher dimensional shapes, they're just not significant enough to warrant higher tier scaling. So like I said it can be a standard 4D+7D bulk space without any of them having 11-Coordinate Dimensions or the total cosmology being...
Calculus in higher dimensions are about change rates in complex coordinate spaces. Afaik it would have to be geometric in principle for that sentence to make logical sense.
It actually does not. In M-Theory with Bulk Space it's a 4th Dimensional Space with 7-Dimensional strings that make it 11th Dimensional.
So something being bulk Space does not make every dimension higher bulk spaces. They can also be singular string dimensions. For the thread Low 1-C looks...
The steam doesn't expand outwards and destroy more of the tunnel.
Anything moving in a confined space at the calced values would be. In addition just rewatching the scene the assumption is also just wrong, you can see steam and vapor pore out from the hole around the beam, meaning its not being...
That's probably accurate. You can look up ocean depth maps (Bathymetric Maps) and you'll see similar numbers. Most port cities are built on those water depths because they're good for shipping and ship building iirc.