This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The original post points out some interesting ideas that can be true in many cases, and there are hints of a good sense of humor within the careful explanation. Great job. 👍
I have no problem with Chuck's upgrade being phrased as something like "up to Immeasurable via zooming through time" instead of the way I phrased it. 👍
There is unfortunately such a thing as what I presented. I know it can feel counter-intuitive to those who are attentive of the implications of faster than light travel, but when a character's speed is ranked as faster than light on the VS Battles Wiki, it isn't supposed to imply time travel...
I had read this thread's original post and then gave my take on the matter. I wrote it without directly clarifying every detail about your explanation, so I'll elaborate now.
Laser Bird's most incredible speed being described as a "sometimes" event that he "reaches", which earns him the title...
This is "up to Immeasurable via FTL travel". The time travel is a product of faster than light movement being more scientifically accurate in Angry Birds than in fictions that most speed scalers are familiar with, which the VS Battles Wiki's wording doesn't account for in a convenient way. The...
Sure, and then the Intelligence section will be inconsistent with the format in most of the other sections, just for the sake of being able to put a period at the end of the last sentence, which might still get deleted anyway. The pet peeve in essence is the waste of effort. I just wish it were...
A pet peeve I have is the general lack of literary properness in the standard format. For example, it's considered as correct to not add punctuation to the final sentence of an Intelligence section justification, even if previous sentences have punctuation. I see this as doing absolutely nothing...
The VS Battles Wiki currently sets Blocky as fodderizing a starry sky, whereas Lance possibly has such starry sky power by being comparable to a different character who created a black hole that has a starry sky. Block would have the strength advantage in this scenario. However, Blocky is weak...
I haven't played this game, so I don't know what's going on overall. Is it about Pac-Man discovering what kind of food people make in different countries, and traveling to those locations himself? If so, then I suppose the speed upgrade is fine. Otherwise, it seems like Pac-Man can move at...
Hmm, this is a good question. Well, let's re-frame the circumstances into something familiar...
In a series that's a show, a character is listed as having scissors as optional equipment, because there was one scene where there were scissors on the table of their home. However, in a flashback to...
I find that this feature is odd in general. I never include any of them when making profiles. When the abilities are properly listed in the Powers and Abilities section and they're described in a way that suggests they circumvent the need for a stat, then it's redundant to write that again in...
That depends on what "essence" means. It's vague, even in real life. What is the "essence" of a human? Some people would answer that it's their consciousness or their "spirit", and some people would simply answer that it's something not metaphysical that they feel is most important about them...
That name reminds me of something...
It appears that the image you wanted to post failed to embed. Do you see it like that too? I see an image file icon followed by "20240203_004848.jpg", instead of the image itself.
Keep in mind that Standard Battle Assumptions make the match so that the combatants would consider each other as opponents, so much like how Creepers perceive Minecraft player characters as targets, they would perceive Composite Tree as an opponent, even though they don't normally attack trees.
I never looked at that match-up, but my guess is that Sans' karma effect got amplified by the average Undertale fandom discussion effect. That is an extremely powerful combination.
I feel like this kind of match-up would be most enjoyable by actually running a simulation of it. 😃
I vote for Composite Tree winning. Creepers exploding would not only destroy themselves, but their teammates around them, yet those explosions don't have enough area of effect to destroy...
If only the Tiering System made more sense. I think the ones in TV Tropes are interesting even though there are a lot less tiers than the one on the VS Battles Wiki, and even though they aren't made for battleboarding.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/JustForFun/SuperWeight...
The VS Battles Wiki is primarily an information indexing website, whereas the battleboarding of versus threads in this forum website is bonus content. I don't care whether or not people can use social influencing to argue in favor of Gojo in a versus thread, and I don't have to care. What I care...
I agree that the ability addition would be more clear-cut using your recommendation. My tone was meant to be like "he doesn't even need his reputation to be attention grabbing", but of course, I should include his high reputation in the justification to solidify it. I remember discovering that...
Thanks. I thought the revision was straightforward enough for only one administrator to be sufficient, but now I'll check if anyone else is available to evaluate the thread.
The reason I presented the evidence of Flower using a hammer against a bug was to demonstrate that she does take action against a target she knows is there. In the example you're referencing, the bugs unexpectedly came from eggs, so Flower wasn't as aware about them compared to the time she used...
I don't know, but there's no reason to believe that Flower would stand still doing nothing against an opponent she would expect to approach her, just because that opponent is a bug. Flower would take action in one way or another.
Based on what I bothered to read, your points look well thought out to me, but keep in mind that, if a character qualifies as an unrealistic genius in multiple scientific fields separately from each other, as in the character qualifies for the "Genius" rank multiple times per different...
If you want to be safe, you could clarify in the battle conditions that the combatants don't lose prior knowledge that they may already canonically have.
It's an odd case considering how Composite Human's opponent is Composite Tree. I think it'd take Composite Human out of character if they suddenly not know what trees are anymore just because the opponent is all trees combined. I think Standard Battle Assumptions don't account for if an opponent...