The only assumption in the calculation would be Frisk weight. But that's why there is a low end and a high ball.
The surface area, distances, sizes, etc are all calculated from Frisk accepted height.
Bone density, bone compressive strength, etc have scientific sources and are not made up crap.
Is there anything else that should be improved/fixed?
The surface area, distances, sizes, etc are all calculated from Frisk accepted height.
Bone density, bone compressive strength, etc have scientific sources and are not made up crap.
Is there anything else that should be improved/fixed?
Don't really agree with this.