VS Battles Wiki Forum

What requirements are you referencing for something to lack dimensionality?

Being independent and beyond physics on any level [as there are infinite universes , each has counterintuitive physics to each other, infinite different counterintuitive physics and space beyond is above them all]
Dimensionality is a concept of physics [so indepence to dimensionality by the same logic]
"In physics and mathematics, the dimension of a mathematical space (or object) is informally defined as the minimum number of coordinates needed to specify any point within it.[1][2] Thus, a line has a dimension of one (1D) because only one coordinate is needed to specify a point on it – "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimen...ordinate is needed to specify a point on it –

Are these claims of yours using direct statements or inferences from the show?

Please refer to our site pages when preparing a future proposal for the site.

My scale is based on these scans





So I have both screenplay evidence and author confirmation
Here's supporting scan from faq page [answer to question 11]
Please tell that do you agree with this scale

I can't say I follow how "counterintuitive" physics and a "non-parallel sky" relate to dimensional tiering.

What quotes from the FAQ are you referencing?

Infinite different type of laws of physics [like having different time flow and even confusing a being who has absolute knowledge of structure of universe as he has studied it for millions of years] and then each universe has Counterintuitive laws of physics and then infinite universes [so all types of possible and impossible laws of physics are applicable, this is also backed up by author scan] means that space beyond transcends them all via transcending all universes . Dimensionality is also a concept of laws of physics [I provided two links in previous message] so transcending all possible and impossible laws of physics leads to transcending all possible and Impossible dimensionalities making it independent of all of dimensionality and it is automatically superior to coordinate system at any level

I quoted answer of question 11 from Faq page

You are using the following?

"What tier is transcending space and time?"
or
"How can a character be 1-A and above without an infinite-dimensional/infinitely-layered cosmology, then?"

How can a character be 1-A and above without an infinite-dimensional/infinitely-layered cosmology, then?"

Also since argument is based on "beyond physics'' point , so can I use old teiring's outerversal defination?

"A good way to accomplish this would be to show that whatever state of being in which they exist is completely independent of the number of layers/dimensions present on the setting. For example, if they are unaffected by dimensions being arbitrarily added or removed from physical space by virtue of transcending it entirely, or if they exist as a "background" or canvas of sorts in which any amount of them can be inserted. This argument generalizes to tiers higher than 1-A as well.

Note that, in order to jump to 1-A this way, it does not suffice that adding one or several layers/dimensions makes no difference to the character in question. That much could be true even if the character only has one level of qualitative superiority to the constructs, as then they would all appear to have zero / infinitely small size to them. It has to be clear in some fashion that even if an infinite or unlimited number of dimensions/layers are added or removed it would make no difference to the character. The same applies to similarly large jumps in other tiers, like from 1-A to 1-A+ etc."

I don't see how what you provided earlier pertains to the bolded requirements.