Yeah, though strictly speaking it would be the average of half of both them I believe. If you get the average height of the center of mass, then it can be used with the average hollowness.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
VS Battles Wiki Forum
Damage3245
Therefir
If we are trying to find the center of mass, isn't it the right choice to use half the height of the structure? The structure looks like an inverted cone, which means most of the rocks are closer to the top.
Damage3245
If you're using just the 0.048% figure, then yes. But not if we're talking about the average across the two different panels.
Therefir
The 0.26% value was calculated after the structure was fully formed, when they were already fighting high into the sky.
The 0.048% was at the beginning, before they actually take off.
They got the average between the two values, but honestly, the 0.26% should have more precedent, as it was taken after the structure was made.
The 0.048% was at the beginning, before they actually take off.
They got the average between the two values, but honestly, the 0.26% should have more precedent, as it was taken after the structure was made.
Therefir
I think I'm going to add a high-end with the 0.26% value.
But aside from that, I'm kind of confused by what do you want me to do, the rocks start 216 meters from the ground, and then they extend an unknown distance higher into the sky.
The second volume comes from a panel where can't even see how high they are, we just know the structure is fully made.
But aside from that, I'm kind of confused by what do you want me to do, the rocks start 216 meters from the ground, and then they extend an unknown distance higher into the sky.
The second volume comes from a panel where can't even see how high they are, we just know the structure is fully made.
Damage3245
I think I got a little confused with it. Forget what I've said for the moment.
Damage3245
I need to think about it a bit more. Let me get back to you tomorrow.