VS Battles Wiki Forum

With just the scan and with no further context its not a universal or geometric dimensional statement. Since its used with worlds. It just means the monster brings agony to people.

@Qawsedf234 Well, what if I were to say these dimensions applied to a multiverse? I'm making a cosmology blog here.

Yeah, that's not nearly enough evidence to back the idea they're talking about actual geometric dimensions. They're using dimension and universe are interchangeable terms. In fact even the scan that might be the closest to actual geometric dimensions is rendered less trustworthy because dimensions are used as universes in so many other scans.

Also even if the above were true, there's no justification for a High 1-B rating. Just 1-B. Billions of dimensions are still countable dimensions and not a true infinite number.

@Qawsedf234 Okay, so what do you think the most accurate tiering would be for each section I wrote in there?

A higher level of 2-A from what I can see. Maybe Low 1-C if you can prove transcendent scaling.

@Qawsedf234 So, would you say something along the lines like "At least 2-A, possibly Low 1-C" if I were to use what I currently have?

Yeah.

@Qawsedf234 Got it, thanks! I'll let you know when I have more information.

"Since its used with worlds. It just means the monster brings agony to people." Wait so, it doesn't mean actual worlds but uses it in a flowery way? Or wdym. (based off of that alone like you said)

The phrase with worlds doesn't work if they're talking about coordinate dimensions. You can't bring agony to the X-axis, but you can bring agony to universes or planets.

@Qawsedf234 So then, what tiering would it be based on that context? Antvasima told me it was 2-B, but i wanted to run it by you first.

2A was based on the author WoG. With just comic scans it would be 2-B.